Literature DB >> 27899195

The future of clinical cancer genomics.

Kenneth Offit1.   

Abstract

The current and future applications of genomics to the practice of preventive oncology are being impacted by a number of challenges. These include rapid advances in genomic science and technology that allow massively parallel sequencing of both tumors and the germline, a diminishing of intellectual property restrictions on diagnostic genetic applications, rapid expansion of access to the internet which includes mobile access to both genomic data and tools to communicate and interpret genetic data in a medical context, the expansion of for-profit diagnostic companies seeking to monetize genetic information, and a simultaneous effort to depict medical professionals as barriers to rather than facilitators of understanding one's genome. Addressing each of these issues will be required to bring "personalized" germline genomics to cancer prevention and care. A profound future challenge will be whether clinical cancer genomics will be "de-medicalized" by commercial interests and their advocates, or whether the future course of this field can be modulated in a responsible way that protects the public health while implementing powerful new medical tools for cancer prevention and early detection. Copyright Â
© 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Genomics; Inherited

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27899195      PMCID: PMC5225752          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2016.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  72 in total

1.  Germline RECQL mutations are associated with breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Cezary Cybulski; Jian Carrot-Zhang; Wojciech Kluźniak; Barbara Rivera; Aniruddh Kashyap; Dominika Wokołorczyk; Sylvie Giroux; Javad Nadaf; Nancy Hamel; Shiyu Zhang; Tomasz Huzarski; Jacek Gronwald; Tomasz Byrski; Marek Szwiec; Anna Jakubowska; Helena Rudnicka; Marcin Lener; Bartłomiej Masojć; Patrica N Tonin; Francois Rousseau; Bohdan Górski; Tadeusz Dębniak; Jacek Majewski; Jan Lubiński; William D Foulkes; Steven A Narod; Mohammad R Akbari
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Mutations in BRIP1 confer high risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Thorunn Rafnar; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Patrick Sulem; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Adalbjorg Jonasdottir; Soren Besenbacher; Pär Lundin; Simon N Stacey; Julius Gudmundsson; Olafur T Magnusson; Louise le Roux; Gudbjorg Orlygsdottir; Hafdis T Helgadottir; Hrefna Johannsdottir; Arnaldur Gylfason; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Jon G Jonasson; Ana de Juan; Eugenia Ortega; Jose M Ramon-Cajal; Maria D García-Prats; Carlos Mayordomo; Angeles Panadero; Fernando Rivera; Katja K H Aben; Anne M van Altena; Leon F A G Massuger; Mervi Aavikko; Paula M Kujala; Synnöve Staff; Lauri A Aaltonen; Kristrun Olafsdottir; Johannes Bjornsson; Augustine Kong; Anna Salvarsdottir; Hafsteinn Saemundsson; Karl Olafsson; Kristrun R Benediktsdottir; Jeffrey Gulcher; Gisli Masson; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Jose I Mayordomo; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Genetics, genomics, and cancer risk assessment: State of the Art and Future Directions in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Precision oncology: origins, optimism, and potential.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Tito Fojo; Michael Brada
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Rare mutations in XRCC2 increase the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  D J Park; F Lesueur; T Nguyen-Dumont; M Pertesi; F Odefrey; F Hammet; S L Neuhausen; E M John; I L Andrulis; M B Terry; M Daly; S Buys; F Le Calvez-Kelm; A Lonie; B J Pope; H Tsimiklis; C Voegele; F M Hilbers; N Hoogerbrugge; A Barroso; A Osorio; G G Giles; P Devilee; J Benitez; J L Hopper; S V Tavtigian; D E Goldgar; M C Southey
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  The carrier frequency of the BRCA1 185delAG mutation is approximately 1 percent in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals.

Authors:  J P Struewing; D Abeliovich; T Peretz; N Avishai; M M Kaback; F S Collins; L C Brody
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Gene patents and personalized cancer care: impact of the Myriad case on clinical oncology.

Authors:  Kenneth Offit; Angela Bradbury; Courtney Storm; Jon F Merz; Kevin E Noonan; Rebecca Spence
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Germline Variants in Targeted Tumor Sequencing Using Matched Normal DNA.

Authors:  Kasmintan A Schrader; Donavan T Cheng; Vijai Joseph; Meera Prasad; Michael Walsh; Ahmet Zehir; Ai Ni; Tinu Thomas; Ryma Benayed; Asad Ashraf; Annie Lincoln; Maria Arcila; Zsofia Stadler; David Solit; David M Hyman; David Hyman; Liying Zhang; David Klimstra; Marc Ladanyi; Kenneth Offit; Michael Berger; Mark Robson
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk.

Authors:  Douglas F Easton; Paul D P Pharoah; Antonis C Antoniou; Marc Tischkowitz; Sean V Tavtigian; Katherine L Nathanson; Peter Devilee; Alfons Meindl; Fergus J Couch; Melissa Southey; David E Goldgar; D Gareth R Evans; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Nazneen Rahman; Mark Robson; Susan M Domchek; William D Foulkes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Germline BAP1 mutations predispose to malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  Joseph R Testa; Mitchell Cheung; Jianming Pei; Jennifer E Below; Yinfei Tan; Eleonora Sementino; Nancy J Cox; A Umran Dogan; Harvey I Pass; Sandra Trusa; Mary Hesdorffer; Masaki Nasu; Amy Powers; Zeyana Rivera; Sabahattin Comertpay; Mika Tanji; Giovanni Gaudino; Haining Yang; Michele Carbone
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Genomic approaches to accelerate cancer interception.

Authors:  Jennifer Beane; Joshua D Campbell; Julian Lel; Jessica Vick; Avrum Spira
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Prospective Feasibility Trial of a Novel Strategy of Facilitated Cascade Genetic Testing Using Telephone Counseling.

Authors:  Melissa K Frey; Ryan M Kahn; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Francesca Tubito; Maira Pires; Paul Christos; Samantha Anderson; Semanti Mukherjee; Bailey Jordan; Stephanie V Blank; Thomas A Caputo; Ravi N Sharaf; Kenneth Offit; Kevin Holcomb; Steven Lipkin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing.

Authors:  Diana Mandelker; Liying Zhang; Yelena Kemel; Zsofia K Stadler; Vijai Joseph; Ahmet Zehir; Nisha Pradhan; Angela Arnold; Michael F Walsh; Yirong Li; Anoop R Balakrishnan; Aijazuddin Syed; Meera Prasad; Khedoudja Nafa; Maria I Carlo; Karen A Cadoo; Meg Sheehan; Megan H Fleischut; Erin Salo-Mullen; Magan Trottier; Steven M Lipkin; Anne Lincoln; Semanti Mukherjee; Vignesh Ravichandran; Roy Cambria; Jesse Galle; Wassim Abida; Marcia E Arcila; Ryma Benayed; Ronak Shah; Kenneth Yu; Dean F Bajorin; Jonathan A Coleman; Steven D Leach; Maeve A Lowery; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Philip W Kantoff; Charles L Sawyers; Maura N Dickler; Leonard Saltz; Robert J Motzer; Eileen M O'Reilly; Howard I Scher; Jose Baselga; David S Klimstra; David B Solit; David M Hyman; Michael F Berger; Marc Ladanyi; Mark E Robson; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A Pragmatic Testing-Eligibility Framework for Population Mutation Screening: The Example of BRCA1/2.

Authors:  Ana F Best; Margaret A Tucker; Megan N Frone; Mark H Greene; June A Peters; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Outcomes of retesting in patients with previously uninformative cancer genetics evaluations.

Authors:  Shenin A Dettwyler; Erika S Koeppe; Michelle F Jacobs; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.446

6.  Facilitated cascade testing (FaCT): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Haley A Moss; Catherine H Watson; Diana L Urbauer; Alexander Melamed; Karen H Lu; Steven M Lipkin; Kenneth Offit; Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Melissa K Frey
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 7.  Comprehensive Analysis of Cancer-Proteogenome to Identify Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis and Prognosis of Cancer.

Authors:  Hem D Shukla
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2017-10-25

8.  Main implications related to the switch to BRCA1/2 tumor testing in ovarian cancer patients: a proposal of a consensus.

Authors:  Ettore Capoluongo; Giovanni Scambia; Jean-Marc Nabholtz
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-13

9.  Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening.

Authors:  Kenneth Offit; Kaitlyn A Tkachuk; Zsofia K Stadler; Michael F Walsh; Hector Diaz-Zabala; Jeffrey D Levin; Zoe Steinsnyder; Vignesh Ravichandran; Ravi N Sharaf; Melissa K Frey; Steven M Lipkin; Mark E Robson; Jada G Hamilton; Joseph Vijai; Semanti Mukherjee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 50.717

10.  Familial Cancer Variant Prioritization Pipeline version 2 (FCVPPv2) applied to a papillary thyroid cancer family.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Obul Reddy Bandapalli; Nagarajan Paramasivam; Sara Giangiobbe; Chiara Diquigiovanni; Elena Bonora; Roland Eils; Matthias Schlesner; Kari Hemminki; Asta Försti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.