Literature DB >> 31922918

Prospective Feasibility Trial of a Novel Strategy of Facilitated Cascade Genetic Testing Using Telephone Counseling.

Melissa K Frey1, Ryan M Kahn1, Eloise Chapman-Davis1, Francesca Tubito1, Maira Pires1, Paul Christos1, Samantha Anderson1, Semanti Mukherjee2, Bailey Jordan1, Stephanie V Blank2, Thomas A Caputo1, Ravi N Sharaf1, Kenneth Offit2, Kevin Holcomb1, Steven Lipkin1.   

Abstract

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Probands with newly diagnosed cancer-associated pathogenic variants were offered facilitated cascade testing whereby the genetics team identified and contacted ARRs by telephone to disclose the familial pathogenic variant and offer telephone counseling and mailed saliva testing. Results and guideline-based recommendations were reviewed by telephone and shared with the primary care physician.
RESULTS: Thirty probands were enrolled, and 114 ARRs were identified. Twelve ARRs were excluded (lived outside of the United States, n = 5; proband did not approve of contact, n = 7). Among 102 ARRs telephoned, contact was established with 95 (93%). Among 114 identified ARRs, 66 (58%) completed genetic testing. Among those completing testing, 27 (41%) carried the familial pathogenic variant. Surveys of ARRs at the time of genetic testing and 6 months later demonstrated low levels of anxiety, depression, distress, and uncertainty and high levels of satisfaction with testing. At 6 months, 7 ARRs with pathogenic variants had undergone cancer surveillance interventions and 4 had undergone cancer risk-reducing surgery.
CONCLUSION: Facilitated cascade testing with telephone genetic counseling and mailed saliva kits resulted in high testing uptake among ARRs. Positive genetic testing resulted in utilization of genetically targeted primary disease prevention at short-term follow-up. Facilitated cascade testing is a straightforward, low-cost, easily implemented strategy with significant potential to promote early detection for affected ARRs and reduce cancer mortality and should be evaluated in larger scale clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31922918      PMCID: PMC7193751          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  27 in total

1.  Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Amy P M Finch; Jan Lubinski; Pål Møller; Christian F Singer; Beth Karlan; Leigha Senter; Barry Rosen; Lovise Maehle; Parviz Ghadirian; Cezary Cybulski; Tomasz Huzarski; Andrea Eisen; William D Foulkes; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Nadine Tung; Henry T Lynch; Susan Neuhausen; Kelly A Metcalfe; Islay Thompson; Joan Murphy; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Beth N Peshkin; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Rachel Nusbaum; An-Tsun Huang; Yaojen Chang; Kristi Graves; Claudine Isaacs; Marie Wood; Wendy McKinnon; Judy Garber; Shelley McCormick; Anita Y Kinney; George Luta; Sarah Kelleher; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Patti Vegella; Angie Tong; Lesley King
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Cascade testing in familial hypercholesterolaemia: how should family members be contacted?

Authors:  Ainsley J Newson; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women With a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Kimberly K Childers; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; James Macinko
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale.

Authors:  M Holmes-Rovner; J Kroll; N Schmitt; D R Rovner; M L Breer; M L Rothert; G Padonu; G Talarczyk
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Ethical obligations and counseling challenges in cancer genetics.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Nancy Press
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 7.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 727: Cascade Testing: Testing Women for Known Hereditary Genetic Mutations Associated With Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

Authors:  A S Zigmond; R P Snaith
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 6.392

9.  Cascade Genetic Testing of Relatives for Hereditary Cancer Risk: Results of an Online Initiative.

Authors:  Jennifer L Caswell-Jin; Anjali D Zimmer; Will Stedden; Kerry E Kingham; Alicia Y Zhou; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  The impact of an interventional counselling procedure in families with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation: efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Erica Sermijn; Liesbeth Delesie; Ellen Deschepper; Ingrid Pauwels; Maryse Bonduelle; Erik Teugels; Jacques De Grève
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  11 in total

1.  Novel Models of Genetic Education and Testing for Pancreatic Cancer Interception: Preliminary Results from the GENERATE Study.

Authors:  C Sloane Furniss; Matthew B Yurgelun; Chinedu Ukaegbu; Pamela E Constantinou; Catherine C Lafferty; Eliana R Talcove-Berko; Alison N Schwartz; Jill E Stopfer; Meghan Underhill-Blazey; Barbara Kenner; Scott H Nelson; Sydney Okumura; Sherman Law; Alicia Y Zhou; Tara B Coffin; Nicolette J Rodriguez; Hajime Uno; Allyson J Ocean; Florencia McAllister; Andrew M Lowy; Scott M Lippman; Alison P Klein; Lisa Madlensky; Gloria M Petersen; Judy E Garber; Michael G Goggins; Anirban Maitra; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-10-08

2.  Facilitated cascade testing (FaCT): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Haley A Moss; Catherine H Watson; Diana L Urbauer; Alexander Melamed; Karen H Lu; Steven M Lipkin; Kenneth Offit; Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Melissa K Frey
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Implementing Systematic Genetic Counseling and Multigene Germline Testing for Individuals With Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Anu Chittenden; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Chinedu Ukaegbu; Meghan Underhill-Blazey; Shraddha Gaonkar; Hajime Uno; Lauren K Brais; Kimberly Perez; Brian M Wolpin; Sapna Syngal; Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-01-13

4.  Achieving universal genetic assessment for women with ovarian cancer: Are we there yet? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jenny Lin; Ravi N Sharaf; Rachel Saganty; Danyal Ahsan; Julia Feit; Andrea Khoury; Hannah Bergeron; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Evelyn Cantillo; Kevin Holcomb; Stephanie V Blank; Ying Liu; Charlene Thomas; Paul J Christos; Drew N Wright; Steven Lipkin; Kenneth Offit; Melissa K Frey
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening.

Authors:  Kenneth Offit; Kaitlyn A Tkachuk; Zsofia K Stadler; Michael F Walsh; Hector Diaz-Zabala; Jeffrey D Levin; Zoe Steinsnyder; Vignesh Ravichandran; Ravi N Sharaf; Melissa K Frey; Steven M Lipkin; Mark E Robson; Jada G Hamilton; Joseph Vijai; Semanti Mukherjee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 50.717

6.  Healthcare professionals' responsibility for informing relatives at risk of hereditary disease.

Authors:  Kalle Grill; Anna Rosén
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Residential Locale Is Associated with Disparities in Genetic Testing-Related Outcomes Among BRCA1/2-Positive Women.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  Uptake of cancer risk management strategies among women who undergo cascade genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Grace Tran; Brooke Levin; Kristin D Mattie; Brian Dreyer; Robert J Volk; Generosa Grana; Banu K Arun; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Usefulness of mobile apps for communication of genetic test results to at-risk family members in a U.S. integrated health system: a qualitative approach from user-testing.

Authors:  Cameron B Haas; Aaron Scrol; Chethan Jujjavarapu; Gail P Jarvik; Nora B Henrikson
Journal:  Health Policy Technol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Leveraging Health Information Technology to Collect Family Cancer History: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Ryan M Kahn; Noelani Wing; Zhen Ni Zhou; Andreas Ian Lackner; Hannah Krinsky; Nora Badiner; Rhea Fogla; Isabel Wolfe; Hannah Bergeron; Becky Baltich Nelson; Charlene Thomas; Paul J Christos; Ravi N Sharaf; Evelyn Cantillo; Kevin Holcomb; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Melissa K Frey
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.