Literature DB >> 30692095

A Pragmatic Testing-Eligibility Framework for Population Mutation Screening: The Example of BRCA1/2.

Ana F Best1, Margaret A Tucker1, Megan N Frone1, Mark H Greene1, June A Peters1, Hormuzd A Katki2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Eligibility guidelines for genetic testing may be revisited, given technological advances, plummeting costs, and proposals for population mutation screening. A key property of eligibility criteria is the tradeoff between the number of mutation carriers identified versus population members tested. We assess the fractions of mutation carriers identified, versus women undergoing mutation testing, for BRCA1/2 founder mutation screening in U.S. Ashkenazi-Jewish women.
METHODS: BRCA1/2 carrier probabilities, based on personal/family history, were calculated using the risk-prediction tool BRCAPRO for 4,589 volunteers (102 mutation carriers) in the population-based Washington Ashkenazi Study. For each carrier-probability threshold between 0% and 10%, we compared the percentage of founder mutations detected versus the percentage of women requiring mutation testing. PCR mutation testing was conducted at the NIH for the 3 Ashkenazi-Jewish founder mutations (5382insC and 185delAG in BRCA1, and 6174delT in BRCA2).
RESULTS: Identifying 90% of BRCA1/2 founder mutations required testing the 60% of Ashkenazi-Jewish women with carrier probabilities exceeding 0.56%, potentially avoiding mutation testing for approximately 0.7 to 1.1 million U.S. Ashkenazi-Jewish women. Alternatively, testing the 44% whose carrier probability exceeded 0.78% identified 80% of mutation carriers, increasing to 89% of mutation carriers when accounting for cascade testing triggered after mutation-positive daughters were identified by screening. We present data on all carrier-probability thresholds, e.g., a 5% threshold identified 46% of mutation carriers while testing 10% of women.
CONCLUSIONS: Different carrier-probability thresholds offered diverse tradeoffs between numbers of identified mutation carriers versus women tested. Low carrier-probability thresholds identified 90% of BRCA1/2 founder mutation carriers, without testing approximately 1 million U.S. Ashkenazi-Jewish women with lowest carrier probabilities. IMPACT: In general, this risk-based framework could provide useful new options to consider during eligibility-criteria development for population mutation screening. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30692095      PMCID: PMC7451358          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  39 in total

1.  Is it time to offer BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing to all Jewish women?

Authors:  K A Metcalfe; A Eisen; J Lerner-Ellis; S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation predictions using the BRCAPRO and Myriad models in Korean ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Eoh; Ji Soo Park; Hyung Seok Park; Seung-Tae Lee; Jeongwoo Han; Jung-Yun Lee; Sang Wun Kim; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim; Eun Ji Nam
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Bias Correction Methods Explain Much of the Variation Seen in Breast Cancer Risks of BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Janet R Vos; Li Hsu; Richard M Brohet; Marian J E Mourits; Jakob de Vries; Kathleen E Malone; Jan C Oosterwijk; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Precision medicine meets public health: population screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Amnon Lahad; Mary-Claire King
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Distribution and clinical impact of functional variants in 50,726 whole-exome sequences from the DiscovEHR study.

Authors:  Frederick E Dewey; Michael F Murray; John D Overton; Lukas Habegger; Joseph B Leader; Samantha N Fetterolf; Colm O'Dushlaine; Cristopher V Van Hout; Jeffrey Staples; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Raghu Metpally; Sarah A Pendergrass; Monica A Giovanni; H Lester Kirchner; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Noura S Abul-Husn; Dustin N Hartzel; Daniel R Lavage; Korey A Kost; Jonathan S Packer; Alexander E Lopez; John Penn; Semanti Mukherjee; Nehal Gosalia; Manoj Kanagaraj; Alexander H Li; Lyndon J Mitnaul; Lance J Adams; Thomas N Person; Kavita Praveen; Anthony Marcketta; Matthew S Lebo; Christina A Austin-Tse; Heather M Mason-Suares; Shannon Bruse; Scott Mellis; Robert Phillips; Neil Stahl; Andrew Murphy; Aris Economides; Kimberly A Skelding; Christopher D Still; James R Elmore; Ingrid B Borecki; George D Yancopoulos; F Daniel Davis; William A Faucett; Omri Gottesman; Marylyn D Ritchie; Alan R Shuldiner; Jeffrey G Reid; David H Ledbetter; Aris Baras; David J Carey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Higher-than-expected population prevalence of potentially pathogenic germline TP53 variants in individuals unselected for cancer history.

Authors:  Kelvin César de Andrade; Lisa Mirabello; Douglas R Stewart; Eric Karlins; Roelof Koster; Mingyi Wang; Susan M Gapstur; Mia M Gaudet; Neal D Freedman; Maria Teresa Landi; Nathanaël Lemonnier; Pierre Hainaut; Sharon A Savage; Maria Isabel Achatz
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations.

Authors:  James D Fackenthal; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.

Authors:  Ranjit Manchanda; Rosa Legood; Matthew Burnell; Alistair McGuire; Maria Raikou; Kelly Loggenberg; Jane Wardle; Saskia Sanderson; Sue Gessler; Lucy Side; Nyala Balogun; Rakshit Desai; Ajith Kumar; Huw Dorkins; Yvonne Wallis; Cyril Chapman; Rohan Taylor; Chris Jacobs; Ian Tomlinson; Uziel Beller; Usha Menon; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantifying risk stratification provided by diagnostic tests and risk predictions: Comparison to AUC and decision curve analysis.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A simple framework to identify optimal cost-effective risk thresholds for a single screen: Comparison to Decision Curve Analysis.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Ionut Bebu
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.175

3.  Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening.

Authors:  Kenneth Offit; Kaitlyn A Tkachuk; Zsofia K Stadler; Michael F Walsh; Hector Diaz-Zabala; Jeffrey D Levin; Zoe Steinsnyder; Vignesh Ravichandran; Ravi N Sharaf; Melissa K Frey; Steven M Lipkin; Mark E Robson; Jada G Hamilton; Joseph Vijai; Semanti Mukherjee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 50.717

4.  Multigene Panel Germline Testing of 1333 Czech Patients with Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Klara Lhotova; Lenka Stolarova; Petra Zemankova; Michal Vocka; Marketa Janatova; Marianna Borecka; Marta Cerna; Sandra Jelinkova; Jan Kral; Zuzana Volkova; Marketa Urbanova; Petra Kleiblova; Eva Machackova; Lenka Foretova; Jana Hazova; Petra Vasickova; Filip Lhota; Monika Koudova; Leona Cerna; Spiros Tavandzis; Jana Indrakova; Lucie Hruskova; Marcela Kosarova; Radek Vrtel; Viktor Stranecky; Stanislav Kmoch; Michal Zikan; Libor Macurek; Zdenek Kleibl; Jana Soukupova
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.