Literature DB >> 31365323

Sustained envelope periodicity representations are associated with speech-in-noise performance in difficult listening conditions for younger and older adults.

Carolyn M McClaskey1, James W Dias1, Kelly C Harris1.   

Abstract

Temporal modulations are an important part of speech signals. An accurate perception of these time-varying qualities of sound is necessary for successful communication. The current study investigates the relationship between sustained envelope encoding and speech-in-noise perception in a cohort of normal-hearing younger (ages 18-30 yr, n = 22) and older adults (ages 55-90+ yr, n = 35) using the subcortical auditory steady-state response (ASSR). ASSRs were measured in response to the envelope of 400-ms amplitude-modulated (AM) tones with 3,000-Hz carrier frequencies and 80-Hz modulation frequencies. AM tones had modulation depths of 0, -4, and -8 dB relative to m = 1 (m = 1, 0.631, and 0.398, respectively). The robustness, strength at modulation frequency, and synchrony of subcortical envelope encoding were quantified via time-domain correlations, spectral amplitude, and phase-locking value, respectively. Speech-in-noise ability was quantified via the QuickSIN test in the 0- and 5-dB signal-to-noise (SNR) conditions. All ASSR metrics increased with increasing modulation depth and there were no effects of age group. ASSR metrics in response to shallow modulation depths predicted 0-dB speech scores. Results demonstrate that sustained amplitude envelope processing in the brainstem relates to speech-in-noise abilities, but primarily in difficult listening conditions at low SNRs. These findings furthermore highlight the utility of shallow modulation depths for studying temporal processing. The absence of age effects in these data demonstrate that individual differences in the robustness, strength, and specificity of subcortical envelope processing, and not age, predict speech-in-noise performance in the most difficult listening conditions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Failure to correctly understand speech in the presence of background noise is a significant problem for many normal-hearing adults and may impede healthy communication. The relationship between sustained envelope encoding in the brainstem and speech-in-noise perception remains to be clarified. The present study demonstrates that the strength, specificity, and robustness of the brainstem's representations of sustained stimulus periodicity relates to speech-in-noise perception in older and younger normal-hearing adults, but only in highly challenging listening environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; auditory steady-state response; envelope following response; speech perception; temporal processing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31365323      PMCID: PMC6843096          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00845.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  56 in total

1.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Mead C Killion; Patricia A Niquette; Gail I Gudmundsen; Lawrence J Revit; Shilpi Banerjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Han-Gyol Yi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone.

Authors:  T W Picton; C R Skinner; S C Champagne; A J Kellett; A C Maiste
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Sasha M John; Bruce A Schneider; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Human Envelope Following Responses to Amplitude Modulation: Effects of Aging and Modulation Depth.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Jamal Alsamri; M Sasha John; David Purcell; Sahara George; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Sarah Verhulst; Luke Shaheen; M Charles Liberman; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21

10.  The Role of Age-Related Declines in Subcortical Auditory Processing in Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Tim Schoof; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-23
View more
  5 in total

1.  Neural Presbyacusis in Humans Inferred from Age-Related Differences in Auditory Nerve Function and Structure.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Jayne B Ahlstrom; James W Dias; Lilyana B Kerouac; Carolyn M McClaskey; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 2.  Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Peripheral deficits and phase-locking declines in aging adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Rebecca Bieber; Alanna Schloss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Intra- and interhemispheric white matter tract associations with auditory spatial processing: Distinct normative and aging effects.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Mark A Eckert; Jens H Jensen; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Objective Detection of the Speech Frequency Following Response (sFFR): A Comparison of Two Methods.

Authors:  Fan-Yin Cheng; Spencer Smith
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-01-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.