Literature DB >> 22933726

Signal-to-noise ratio in the membrane potential of the owl's auditory coincidence detectors.

Go Ashida1, Kazuo Funabiki, Paula T Kuokkanen, Richard Kempter, Catherine E Carr.   

Abstract

Owls use interaural time differences (ITDs) to locate a sound source. They compute ITD in a specialized neural circuit that consists of axonal delay lines from the cochlear nucleus magnocellularis (NM) and coincidence detectors in the nucleus laminaris (NL). Recent physiological recordings have shown that tonal stimuli induce oscillatory membrane potentials in NL neurons (Funabiki K, Ashida G, Konishi M. J Neurosci 31: 15245-15256, 2011). The amplitude of these oscillations varies with ITD and is strongly correlated to the firing rate. The oscillation, termed the sound analog potential, has the same frequency as the stimulus tone and is presumed to originate from phase-locked synaptic inputs from NM fibers. To investigate how these oscillatory membrane potentials are generated, we applied recently developed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis techniques (Kuokkanen PT, Wagner H, Ashida G, Carr CE, Kempter R. J Neurophysiol 104: 2274-2290, 2010) to the intracellular waveforms obtained in vivo. Our theoretical prediction of the band-limited SNRs agreed with experimental data for mid- to high-frequency (>2 kHz) NL neurons. For low-frequency (≤2 kHz) NL neurons, however, measured SNRs were lower than theoretical predictions. These results suggest that the number of independent NM fibers converging onto each NL neuron and/or the population-averaged degree of phase-locking of the NM fibers could be significantly smaller in the low-frequency NL region than estimated for higher best-frequency NL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22933726      PMCID: PMC3545117          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00366.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  58 in total

1.  Passive soma facilitates submillisecond coincidence detection in the owl's auditory system.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Kousuke Abe; Kazuo Funabiki; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Subthreshold K+ channel dynamics interact with stimulus spectrum to influence temporal coding in an auditory brain stem model.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Brent Doiron; John Rinzel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A place theory of sound localization.

Authors:  L A JEFFRESS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1948-02

4.  Noise-gated encoding of slow inputs by auditory brain stem neurons with a low-threshold K+ current.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Brent Doiron; Vibhakar Kotak; John Rinzel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Tonotopic tuning in a sound localization circuit.

Authors:  Sean J Slee; Matthew H Higgs; Adrienne L Fairhall; William J Spain
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Control of submillisecond synaptic timing in binaural coincidence detectors by K(v)1 channels.

Authors:  Paul J Mathews; Pablo E Jercog; John Rinzel; Luisa L Scott; Nace L Golding
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-04       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Asymmetric excitatory synaptic dynamics underlie interaural time difference processing in the auditory system.

Authors:  Pablo E Jercog; Gytis Svirskis; Vibhakar C Kotak; Dan H Sanes; John Rinzel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Cross-correlation in the auditory coincidence detectors of owls.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; G Björn Christianson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Heterogeneous kinetics and pharmacology of synaptic inhibition in the chick auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Sidney P Kuo; Laura A Bradley; Laurence O Trussell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Reliability of synaptic transmission at the synapses of Held in vivo under acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Bernhard Englitz; Sandra Tolnai; Marei Typlt; Jürgen Jost; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Linear summation in the barn owl's brainstem underlies responses to interaural time differences.

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Go Ashida; Catherine E Carr; Hermann Wagner; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Sarah L Hodgson; Mary Ellen Scherer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-28

4.  Contribution of action potentials to the extracellular field potential in the nucleus laminaris of barn owl.

Authors:  Paula T Kuokkanen; Go Ashida; Anna Kraemer; Thomas McColgan; Kazuo Funabiki; Hermann Wagner; Christine Köppl; Catherine E Carr; Richard Kempter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Coincidence detection in the medial superior olive: mechanistic implications of an analysis of input spiking patterns.

Authors:  Tom P Franken; Peter Bremen; Philip X Joris
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.