Literature DB >> 26108955

Transspinal constant-current long-lasting stimulation: a new method to induce cortical and corticospinal plasticity.

Maria Knikou1, Luke Dixon2, Danielle Santora2, Mohamed M Ibrahim2.   

Abstract

Functional neuroplasticity in response to stimulation and motor training is a well-established phenomenon. Transcutaneous stimulation of the spine is used mostly to alleviate pain, but it may also induce functional neuroplasticity, because the spinal cord serves as an integration center for descending and ascending neuronal signals. In this work, we examined whether long-lasting noninvasive cathodal (c-tsCCS) and anodal (a-tsCCS) transspinal constant-current stimulation over the thoracolumbar enlargement can induce cortical, corticospinal, and spinal neuroplasticity. Twelve healthy human subjects, blind to the stimulation protocol, were randomly assigned to 40 min of c-tsCCS or a-tsCCS. Before and after transspinal stimulation, we established the afferent-mediated motor evoked potential (MEP) facilitation and the subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-mediated flexor reflex facilitation. Recruitment input-output curves of MEPs and transspinal evoked potentials (TEPs) and postactivation depression of the soleus H reflex and TEPs was also established. We demonstrate that both c-tsCCS and a-tsCCS decrease the afferent-mediated MEP facilitation and alter the subthreshold TMS-mediated flexor reflex facilitation in a polarity-dependent manner. Both c-tsCCS and a-tsCCS increased the tibialis anterior MEPs recorded at 1.2 MEP resting threshold, intermediate, and maximal intensities and altered the recruitment input-output curve of TEPs in a muscle- and polarity-dependent manner. Soleus H-reflex postactivation depression was reduced after a-tsCCS and remained unaltered after c-tsCCS. No changes were found in the postactivation depression of TEPs after c-tsCCS or a-tsCCS. Our findings reveal that c-tsCCS and a-tsCCS have distinct effects on cortical and corticospinal excitability. This method can be utilized to induce targeted neuroplasticity in humans.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain stimulation; motor evoked potential; neuroplasticity; spinal cord stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; transspinal evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26108955      PMCID: PMC4556848          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00449.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  83 in total

1.  Cutaneomotor integration in human hand motor areas: somatotopic effect and interaction of afferents.

Authors:  S Tamburin; P Manganotti; G Zanette; A Fiaschi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX.

Authors:  D P PURPURA; J G MCMURTRY
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity.

Authors:  O D CREUTZFELDT; G H FROMM; H KAPP
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Mobilization of transmitter by hyperpolarization.

Authors:  J I HUBBARD; W D WILLIS
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Electrical stimulation over the human vertebral column: which neural elements are excited?

Authors:  K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-06

6.  Changes in intracortical excitability induced by stimulation of wrist afferents in man.

Authors:  J M Aimonetti; J B Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Effects of spinal cord stimulation on cortical excitability in patients with chronic neuropathic pain: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jürgen R Schlaier; Peter Eichhammer; Berthold Langguth; Christian Doenitz; Harald Binder; Göran Hajak; Alexander Brawanski
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Wolters; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Antje Schlottmann; Erwin Kunesch; Katja Stefan; Leonardo G Cohen; Reiner Benecke; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Increase in tibialis anterior motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve.

Authors:  Svetlana Khaslavskaia; Michel Ladouceur; Thomas Sinkjaer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  The H-reflex as a probe: pathways and pitfalls.

Authors:  Maria Knikou
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  21 in total

1.  Repeated cathodal transspinal pulse and direct current stimulation modulate cortical and corticospinal excitability differently in healthy humans.

Authors:  Lynda M Murray; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Does trans-spinal and local DC polarization affect presynaptic inhibition and post-activation depression?

Authors:  D Kaczmarek; J Ristikankare; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The effect of cathodal transspinal direct current stimulation on tibialis anterior stretch reflex components in humans.

Authors:  Eva Rudjord Therkildsen; Jens Bo Nielsen; Mikkel Malling Beck; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Jakob Lorentzen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Paired associative transspinal and transcortical stimulation produces plasticity in human cortical and spinal neuronal circuits.

Authors:  Luke Dixon; Mohamed M Ibrahim; Danielle Santora; Maria Knikou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Self-Assisted Standing Enabled by Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Dimitry G Sayenko; Mrinal Rath; Adam R Ferguson; Joel W Burdick; Leif A Havton; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Anodal Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) Selectively Inhibits the Synaptic Efficacy of Nociceptive Transmission at Spinal Cord Level.

Authors:  Cédric Lenoir; Aleksandar Jankovski; André Mouraux
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Transspinal stimulation and step training alter function of spinal networks in complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Morad Zaaya; Timothy S Pulverenti; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2021-07-03

Review 9.  Paired Stimulation to Promote Lasting Augmentation of Corticospinal Circuits.

Authors:  Noam Y Harel; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-10-09       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Neurophysiological Changes After Paired Brain and Spinal Cord Stimulation Coupled With Locomotor Training in Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Timothy S Pulverenti; Morad Zaaya; Monika Grabowski; Ewelina Grabowski; Md Anamul Islam; Jeffrey Li; Lynda M Murray; Maria Knikou
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.