Literature DB >> 27888709

Correlations Between DCE MRI and Histopathological Parameters in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Alexey Surov1, Hans Jonas Meyer2, Matthias Gawlitza3, Anne-Kathrin Höhn4, Andreas Boehm5, Thomas Kahn3, Patrick Stumpp3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) can characterize perfusion and vascularization of tissues. DCE MRI parameters can differentiate between malignant and benign lesions and predict tumor grading. The purpose of this study was to correlate DCE MRI findings and various histopathological parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with histologically proven HNSCC (11 cases primary tumors and in 5 patients with local tumor recurrence) were included in the study. DCE imaging was performed in all cases and the following parameters were estimated: Ktrans, Ve, Kep, and iAUC. The tumor proliferation index was estimated on Ki 67 antigen stained specimens. Microvessel density parameters (stained vessel area, total vessel area, number of vessels, and mean vessel diameter) were estimated on CD31 antigen stained specimens. Spearman's non-parametric rank sum correlation coefficients were calculated between DCE and different histopathological parameters.
RESULTS: The mean values of DCE perfusion parameters were as follows: Ktrans 0.189 ± 0.056 min-1, Kep 0.390 ± 0.160 min-1, Ve 0.548 ± 0.119%, and iAUC 22.40 ± 12.57. Significant correlations were observed between Kep and stained vessel areas (r = 0.51, P = .041) and total vessel areas (r = 0.5118, P = .043); between Ve and mean vessel diameter (r = -0.59, P = .017). Cell count had a tendency to correlate with Ve (r = -0.48, P = .058). In an analysis of the primary HNSCC only, a significant inverse correlation between Ktrans and KI 67 was identified (r = -0.62, P = .041). Our analysis showed significant correlations between DCE parameters and histopathological findings in HNSCC.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27888709      PMCID: PMC5124350          DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1936-5233            Impact factor:   4.243


Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) has been reported as a technique which is able to characterize perfusion and vascularization of tissues [1], [2]. It has been shown that DCE MRI can be helpful to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions [1]. For example, Yuan et al. reported that lung cancer had a larger volume transfer constant (Ktrans) and a lower volume of the extravascular extracellular leakage space (V) in comparison to benign lesions [3]. Similar results were reported by Li et al. for breast lesions [4]. Furthermore, according to Cho et al., DCE MRI parameters can be used to distinguish prostatic cancer from benign changes [5]. Moreover, DCE MRI parameters can also predict tumor grading. As reported previously, Ktrans correlated well with Gleason score in prostatic cancer [5], [6]. According to other reports, Ktrans and V correlated with glioma grade [7], [8]. DCE MRI parameters were also associated with prognosis in several malignancies [9], [10]. Koo et al. showed that breast cancers with higher Ktrans or lower V had poor prognostic factors and were often of the triple-negative subtype [10]. According to the literature, DCE MRI parameters can predict response to therapy in different tumors. For instance, some authors mentioned that low pretreatment Ktrans in regional lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer was associated with a poor response to concurrent chemoradiation therapy [11]. Furthermore, Andersen et al. showed that DCE MR parameters obtained prior to chemoradiotherapy predicted survival of patients with cervical cancer [12]. Presumably, DCE MRI parameters may be based on tissue composition, such as cellularity and vascular density. However, in this regard there are contradictory data in the literature. While some studies identified significant correlations between DCE MRI and histopathological parameters, others did not [13], [14], [15], [16]. The purpose of this study was to correlate DCE MRI findings and various histopathological parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Material and Methods

This study was IRB-approved and all patients gave their written informed consent.

Patients

Sixteen patients (2 women and 14 men, mean age 57.0 ± 7.5 years, median age 57 years) with histologically proven HNSCC were included in the study. In 11 cases primary HNSCC and in 5 patients local tumor recurrence was diagnosed.

Perfusion Measure

In all cases, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging was performed using T1w DCE sequences according to a protocol reported previously [17]. T1w DCE included 40 subsequent scans à 6 seconds. Imaging parameters were as follows: TR/TE 2.47/0.97 ms, slice thickness 5 mm, flip angle 8°, voxel size 1.2 × 1.0 × 5.0 mm. The contrast application (0.1 mmol Gadobutrol per kg of bodyweight (Gadovist®, Bayer Healthcare, Leverkusen, Germany)) was started after the fifth scan at a rate of 3 ml per second and flushing with 10 ml of normal saline using a power injector (Spectris Solaris, Medrad, Bayer Healthcare, Leverkusen, Germany). The acquired images were transferred to a software module for tissue perfusion estimation (Tissue 4D, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) as described previously [17], [18]. The software offers a population based approach for the arterial input function (AIF) and the best of three available AIF-options was chosen according to the result of the chi2-parameter, which serves as an error measure for the model fit [17]. The AIF was scaled in relation to the gadolinium dose and modeled according to the bi-exponential model of Tofts and Kermode [19]. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated (for exemplary parameter images see Figure 1, A-E) [17], [18]:
Figure 1

Imaging and histopathological findings in primary hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. (A) Postcontrast, fat-saturatedT1w image showing a large left-sided cervical mass. (B-E). DCE imaging findings. Estimated DCE parameters are as follows: Ktrans = 0.302 min−1 (B), Kep = 0.470 min−1 (C), Ve = 0.659% (D), IAUC = 41.77% (E). (F) Immunohistochemical stain (MIB-1 monoclonal antibody). Ki 67 index is 75% and cell count is 789. (G) Immunohistochemical stain (CD 31 monoclonal antibody). Estimated microvessel parameters are as follows: stained vessel area = 0.85%, total vessel area = 1.67%, mean vessel diameter = 15.17 μm, and number of vessels = 28.

Ktrans: volume transfer constant which estimates the diffusion of contrast medium from the plasma through the vessel wall into the interstitial space, representing vessel permeability; Ve; volume of the extravascular extracellular leakage space (EES); Kep: parameter for diffusion of contrast medium from the EES back to the plasma. It is in close relation with Ktrans and ve and is calculated by the formula kep = Ktrans × Ve−1; iAUC: model-free measurement of the amount of contrast medium delivered to a VOI within a given time period. In every case, the four parameter maps were projected onto the additionally performed T2 weighted fat-suppressed TSE sequences and the tumor was delineated manually on each slice. This resulted in mean values of Ktrans, Kep, Ve and iAUC averaged over the complete tumor. Areas of gross necrosis or large feeding vessels were avoided.

Histopathological Analysis

In every case, sections from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue were cut at 5 mm and stained with various antigens. The tumor proliferation index was estimated on Ki 67 antigen stained specimens by using MIB-1 monoclonal antibody (DakoCytomation, Denmark) as reported previously [20]. The area with the highest number of positive tumor nuclei was selected for the analysis (Figure 1F). Furthermore, microvessel density was estimated on CD31 antigen stained specimens (DakoCytomation, Denmark) according to the previous description (Figure 1G) [21]. All stained samples were digitalized by using a research microscope Jenalumar (Zeiss, Jena, Germany), with camera Diagnostic instruments 4.2., magnification ×400. The digital histopathological images were transferred as uncompressed TIFF images to ImageJ software 1.48v (National Institutes of Health Image program) with a Windows operating system [22], [23]. The following histopathological parameters were estimated using the software: proliferation index (KI 67) as percentage of stained nuclei; cell count as a number of all nuclei; stained vessel area (%) calculated as CD 31 positive area divided by the total area of the analyzed histological specimens; total vessel area (%), i.e. percentage of vessel area including stained vessel area (CD 31+) and vessel lumen. number of vessels; mean vessel diameter, i.e. a sum of all stained vessel diameters divided by the number of vessels; In every case, all histopathological parameters were estimated per two high power fields a 0.16 mm2.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis and graphics creation was performed with SPSS 20 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA). Values are presented as mean ± SD. Mean value comparison was carried out using the Mann–Whitney U test. Spearman's non-parametric rank correlation coefficients were calculated between DCE and different histopathological parameters. Significance level was set at P ≤ .05.

Results

A complete overview of the results including median values and ranges is shown in Table 1. The mean values of DCE perfusion parameters were as follows: Ktrans 0.189 ± 0.056 min−1, Kep 0.390 ± 0.160 min−1, Ve 0.548 ± 0.119%, and iAUC 22.40 ± 12.57.
Table 1

Analyzed Perfusion and Histopathological Parameters of the Tumors

ParameterM ± SDMedianRange
DCE MR parameter
Ktrans0.189 ± 0.0560.17850.079–0.302
Kep0.390 ± 0.1600.36050.136–0.636
Ve0.548 ± 0.1190.52450.372–0.743
IAUC22.40 ± 12.5725.973.028–41.77



Histopathological parameter
Cell count, n1033 ± 3621003313–1657
Ki 67, %46.25 ± 23.9835.0020–90
Stained vessel area,%6.259 ± 7.8312.0750.77–27.20
Total vessel area, %7.476 ± 85063.6871.208–30.35
Mean vessel diameter, μm19.94 ± 7.11318.3411.49–35.38
Mean number of vessels, n53.50 ± 69.4134.0015–301
Histopathological analysis yielded the following results: mean cell count was 1033.19 ± 361.67 and the mean level of the proliferation index was 46.25% ± 23.98%. In addition, mean values of tissue vessels were as follows: stained vessel area 6.259% ± 7.831%, total vessel area 7.476% ± 8.506%, mean vessel diameter 19.94% ± 7.113 μm, and mean number of vessels 53.50 ± 69.41 (Table 1). The results of correlation analysis are shown in Table 2. Significant correlations were observed between Kep and stained vessel areas (r = 0.51, P = .041) and total vessel areas (r = 0.5118, P = .043); between Ve and mean vessel diameter (r = −0.59, P = .017). Cell count had a tendency to correlate with Ve (r = −0.48, P = .058).
Table 2

Identified Correlations Between DCE Perfusion and Histopathological Parameters in HNSCC

ParametersKtrans, min−1Kep, min−1Ve, %IAUC
Cell count, nr = −0.12 (P = .65)r = 0.17 (P = .53)r = −0.48 (P = .058)r = −0.24 (P = .38)
Ki 67, %r = −0.16 (P = .56)r = −0,13 (P = .63)r = −0,061 (P = .82)r = −0,15 (P = .58)
Stained vessel area, %r = 0.21 (P = .42)r = 0.51 (P = .041)r = −0.38 (P = .14)r = 0,4147 (P = .11)
Total vessel area, %r = 0.24 (P = .38)r = 0.51 (P = .043)r = −0.39 (P = .13)r = 0.32 (P = .22)
Mean vessel diameter, μmr = 0.021 (P = .94)r = 0.39 (P = .13)r = −0,59 (P = .017)r = −0.026 (P = .92)
Mean number of vessels, nr = 0.23 (P = .39)r = 0.14 (P = .61)r = 0.031 (P = .91)r = 0.22 (P = .42)
There were no significant correlations between other analyzed parameters (Table 2). In an analysis of the primary HNSCC only, a significant inverse correlation between Ktrans and KI 67 was identified (r = −0.62, P = .041). Furthermore, stronger significant correlations were found between Kep and stained vessel areas, total vessel areas, and between Ve and mean vessel diameter (Table 3).
Table 3

Identified Correlations Between DCE Perfusion and Histopathological Parameters in Primary HNSCC (n = 11)

ParametersKtrans, min−1Kep, min−1Ve, %IAUC
Cell count, nr = −0.25 (P = .47)r = 0.0001 (P = .99)r = −0.37 (P = .27)r = −0.29 (P = .37)
Ki 67, %r = −0.62 (P = .041)r = −0.45 (P = .16)r = −0.16 (P = .64)r = −0.49 (P = .129)
Stained vessel area, %r = 0.21 (P = .53)r = 0.67 (P = .02)r = −0.53 (P = .096)r = 0.31 (P = .34)
Total vessel area, %r = 0.07 (P = .83)r = 0.62 (P = .04)r = −0.65 (P = .03)r = 0.29 (P = .38)
Mean vessel diameter, μmr = −0.17 (P = .62)r = 0.43 (P = .18)r = −0.69 (P = .017)r = 0.06 (P = .85)
Mean number of vessels, nr = 0.24 (P = .49)r = 0.23 (P = .49)r = −0.048 (P = .88)r = 0.32 (P = .32)

Discussion

The present study documents significant correlations between different DCE MRI and histopathological parameters in HNSCC. Previously, some studies also analyzed relationships between histological and perfusion parameters in several malignancies. For instance, Li et al. showed that the mean Ktrans and Kep values significantly correlated with microvessel density in breast cancer [4]. According to Oto et al. Kep positively correlated with the mean blood vessel count and mean vessel area fraction parameters calculated by CD31 staining in prostate cancer [13]. Additionally, the mean blood vessel count and mean vessel area fraction parameters showed a moderate negative correlation with Ve [13]. However, according to the literature several tumors had different associations between DCE and histopathological parameters. For example, Jia et al. found that Ktrans and Ve were both positively correlated with microvessel density in high grade glioma, but not in low grade tumors [14]. Our results confirmed these findings. We also found statistically significant positive correlations between Kep and vessel areas in our cases. Furthermore, Ve correlated inversely with mean vessel diameter. Moreover, these correlations were stronger in primary tumors. As reported previously, DCE parameters correlated not only with vessel density, but also with other tumor markers in different malignancies. For instance, Aryal et al. reported that Ve significantly correlated with tumor cellularity in glioma [15]. Jansen et al. identified a significant correlation between Kep and expression level of vascular endothelial growth factor in cervical lymph node metastases from HNSCC [16]. The authors also found that KI 67 inversely correlated with Ktrans and Ve [16]. In the present study, we found no significant correlations between cell count or KI 67 and DCE MRI parameters. Only Ve tended to correlate with cell count. However, in the cases with primary tumors Ktrans correlated significantly inversely with KI 67. This fact suggests different associations between DCE parameters and histopathology in primary versus recurrent tumors. Similar relationships were reported previously in other malignancies. For instance, perfusions parameters correlated well with KI 67 in glioma, when the data from high and low grade tumors were combined [24]. However, no significant correlation was observed in high or low grade tumors, when they were analyzed separately [24]. The associations between DCE MRI and histopathological parameters identified in the present analysis may be helpful to differentiate HNSCC with low and high proliferation potential. Similarly, the use of DCE MRI can also distinguish tumors with high angiogenesis from lesions with low microvessel density. Therefore, DCE MRI parameters can be used as a noninvasive tool for tumor angiogenesis. In fact, according to Song et al., Ktrans and Ve values decreased statistically significantly after anti-angiogenic treatment in an orthotopic mouse model of human hepatocellular carcinoma [25]. Other authors confirmed these results [26]. This leads to the assumption that DCE MRI may predict response to anti-angiogenic therapy. Presumably, tumors with high microvessel density have a better response to anti-angiogenic drugs. Clearly, further works with more cases are needed to confirm our results and to search for other relevant relationships between DCE and histopathology in different malignancies. In conclusion, our analysis showed significant correlations between Kep, Ve and microvessel density in HNSCC. Ve also tended to correlate with cell count. In primary tumors, the correlations between Kep, Ve and vessel parameters were stronger. Furthermore, in primary tumors, Ktrans correlated significantly with KI 67.
  26 in total

1.  Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts.

Authors:  P S Tofts; A G Kermode
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The assessment of immature microvascular density in brain gliomas with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Zhong Zheng Jia; Hong Mei Gu; Xue Jun Zhou; Jin Long Shi; Min Da Li; Guo Feng Zhou; Xian Hua Wu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Evaluation of tumor microvascular response to brivanib by dynamic contrast-enhanced 7-T MRI in an orthotopic xenograft model of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kyoung Doo Song; Dongil Choi; Jung Hee Lee; Geun Ho Im; Jehoon Yang; Jae-Hun Kim; Won Jae Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in head and neck cancer: potential to guide treatment? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bernstein; Jarrod J Homer; Catharine M West
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 5.337

5.  Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Aytekin Oto; Cheng Yang; Arda Kayhan; Maria Tretiakova; Tatjana Antic; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Scott Eggener; Gregory S Karczmar; Walter M Stadler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Philippe Puech; Eric Potiron; Laurent Lemaitre; Xavier Leroy; Georges-Pascal Haber; Sebastien Crouzet; Kazumi Kamoi; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Correlation Between Different ADC Fractions, Cell Count, Ki-67, Total Nucleic Areas and Average Nucleic Areas in Meningothelial Meningiomas.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Henrike Caysa; Andreas Wienke; Rolf Peter Spielmann; Eckhard Fiedler
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  Glioma grading by microvascular permeability parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intratumoral susceptibility signal on susceptibility weighted imaging.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Li; Yongshan Zhu; Houyi Kang; Yulong Zhang; Huaping Liang; Sumei Wang; Weiguo Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  In Vivo Correlation of Glucose Metabolism, Cell Density and Microcirculatory Parameters in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Results Using Simultaneous PET/MRI.

Authors:  Matthias Gawlitza; Sandra Purz; Klaus Kubiessa; Andreas Boehm; Henryk Barthel; Regine Kluge; Thomas Kahn; Osama Sabri; Patrick Stumpp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging predicts local control in oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Shu-Hang Ng; Chien-Yu Lin; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Tzu-Chen Yen; Chun-Ta Liao; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Sheung-Fat Ko; Hung-Ming Wang; Shiang-Fu Huang; Yu-Chun Lin; Jiun-Jie Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Soft tissue sarcoma: DWI and DCE-MRI parameters correlate with Ki-67 labeling index.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Young Cheol Yoon; Sung Wook Seo; Yoon-La Choi; Hyun Su Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Associations Between Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinically Relevant Histopathological Features in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Jin You Kim; Marco Aiello; Wei Huang; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andreas Wienke; Maciej Pech
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Quantitative parameters derived from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging can accurately estimate the histologic grade of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma preoperatively.

Authors:  Zhaoting Meng; Lingyu Zhang; Caiyun Huang; Yingshi Piao; Xiaohong Chen; Junfang Xian
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 2.995

4.  Histogram Analysis Parameters Derived from Conventional T1- and T2-Weighted Images Can Predict Different Histopathological Features Including Expression of Ki67, EGFR, VEGF, HIF-1α, and p53 and Cell Count in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hans Jonas Meyer; Leonard Leifels; Gordian Hamerla; Anne Kathrin Höhn; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  The effects of intravoxel contrast agent diffusion on the analysis of DCE-MRI data in realistic tissue domains.

Authors:  Ryan T Woodall; Stephanie L Barnes; David A Hormuth; Anna G Sorace; C Chad Quarles; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Application of integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the prognostic factors of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with positron emission tomography, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhancement and combined model.

Authors:  Haodan Dang; Yu Chen; Zhuhua Zhang; Xiaohua Shi; Xingming Chen; Xiaoli Zhu; Bo Hou; Haiqun Xing; Huadan Xue; Zhengyu Jin
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Can Imaging Parameters Provide Information Regarding Histopathology in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Hans Jonas Meyer; Andreas Wienke
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Histogram analysis parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient reflect tumor cellularity and proliferation activity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Hans Jonas Meyer; Karsten Winter; Cindy Richter; Anna-Kathrin Hoehn
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-04

9.  Comparison of Two Mathematical Models of Cellularity Calculation.

Authors:  Hans Jonas Meyer; Nikita Garnov; Alexey Surov
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Histogram analysis parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can predict histopathological findings including proliferation potential, cellularity, and nucleic areas in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Hans Jonas Meyer; Leonard Leifels; Anne-Kathrin Höhn; Cindy Richter; Karsten Winter
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.