| Literature DB >> 23951300 |
Shu-Hang Ng1, Chien-Yu Lin, Sheng-Chieh Chan, Tzu-Chen Yen, Chun-Ta Liao, Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang, Sheung-Fat Ko, Hung-Ming Wang, Shiang-Fu Huang, Yu-Chun Lin, Jiun-Jie Wang.
Abstract
The role of pretreatment dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging (DCE-PWI) and diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in predicting the treatment response of oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OHSCC) to chemoradiation remains unclear. We prospectively investigated the ability of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from pretreatment DCE-PWI and DWI to predict the local control of OHSCC patients treated with chemoradiation. Between August, 2010 and March, 2012, patients with untreated OHSCC scheduled for chemoradiation were eligible for this prospective study. DCE-PWI and DWI were performed in addition to conventional MRI. The relationship of local control with the following clinical and imaging variables was analyzed: the hemoglobin level, T-stage, tumor location, gross tumor volume, maximum standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on FDG PET/CT, transfer constant (K (trans) ), volume of blood plasma and volume of extracellular extravascular space on DCE-PWI, and apparent diffusion coefficient on DWI of the primary tumor. The patients were also divided into a local control group and a local failure group, and their clinical and imaging parameters were compared. There were 58 patients (29 with oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma [SCC] and 29 with hypopharynx SCC) with successful pretreatment DCE-PWI and DWI available for analysis. After a median follow-up of 18.2 months, 17 (29.3%) participants had local failure, whereas the remaining 41 patients achieved local control. Univariate analysis revealed that only the K (trans) value was significantly associated with local control (P = 0.03). When the local control and local failure groups were compared, significant differences were observed in K (trans) and the tumor location (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively). In the multivariable analysis, only K (trans) was statistically significant (P = 0.04). Our results suggest that pretreatment K (trans) may help predict the local control in OHSCC patients treated with chemoradiation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23951300 PMCID: PMC3737151 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of OHSCC patients (n = 58).
|
| |
|---|---|
|
| |
| median | 48.5 |
| range | 34-78 |
|
| |
| Male | 54 (93.1) |
| Female | 4 (6.9) |
|
| |
| median | 14.4 |
| range | 6.1-18.3 |
|
| |
| Hypopharynx | 29 (50) |
| Oropharynx | 29 (50) |
|
| |
| mean | 35.84 |
| range | 1.9-144 |
|
| |
| 1 | 4 (6.9) |
| 2 | 11 (19) |
| 3 | 6 (10.3) |
| 4 | 37 (63.8) |
|
| |
| 0 | 10 (17.2) |
| 1 | 4 (6.9) |
| 2 | 33 (56.9) |
| 3 | 11 (19) |
|
| |
| II | 3 (5.2) |
| III | 3 (5.2) |
| IVA | 38 (65.5) |
| IVB | 14 (24.1) |
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier analysis of local control rate stratified according to the median value of K .
Relationship between local failure and the variables.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| <12 | 12 | 50.0% | 0.71 | |
| > = 12 | 46 | 66.0% | ||
|
| ||||
| Hypopharynx | 29 | 53.5% | 0.07 | |
| Oropharynx | 29 | 81.8% | ||
|
| ||||
| T1-T2 | 15 | 75.0% | 0.28 | |
| T3-T4 | 43 | 59.5% | ||
|
| ||||
| <24.9 | 29 | 72.7% | 0.25 | |
| > = 24.9 | 29 | 51.5% | ||
|
| ||||
| <15.31 | 28 | 78.2% | 0.06 | |
| > = 15.31 | 29 | 49.0% | ||
|
| ||||
| <23.28 | 28 | 74.9% | 0.20 | |
| > = 23.28 | 29 | 54.9% | ||
|
| ||||
| <121.86 | 28 | 75.4% | 0.18 | |
| > = 121.86 | 29 | 51.5% | ||
|
| ||||
| <0.62 | 29 | 57.9% | 0.03 | 0.34 |
| > = 0.62 | 29 | 70.3% | ||
|
| ||||
| <0.01 | 33 | 66.1% | 0.47 | |
| > = 0.01 | 25 | 59.7% | ||
|
| ||||
| <0.2 | 29 | 60.9% | 0.14 | |
| > = 0.2 | 29 | 68.2% | ||
|
| ||||
| <2.63 | 29 | 61.1% | 0.29 | |
| > = 2.63 | 29 | 65.4% | ||
|
| ||||
| <0.96 | 27 | 64.8% | 0.51 | |
| > = 0.96 | 31 | 63.8% |
Abbreviations: GTV = Gross tumor volume; SUV = Standardized uptake value; MTV = Metabolic tumor volume; TLG = Total lesion glycolysis; ADC = Apparent diffusion coefficient*Log Rank test
Figure 4Scatterplots of K in the local control (LC, n= 41) and local failure (LR, n=17) groups.
Figure 5Scatterplots of SUVmax in the local control (LC, n= 41) and local failure (LR, n=17) groups.
Comparison of variables between the local control and local failure groups.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 14±2.1 | 13.7±2.8 | 0.69* | |
|
| ||||
| Hypopharynx | 17 | 12 | 0.04† | 0.30 |
| Oropharynx | 24 | 5 | ||
|
| ||||
| T1-T2 | 12 | 3 | 0.51† | |
| T3-T4 | 29 | 14 | ||
|
| 36±31.9 | 35.5±23.5 | 0.96* | |
|
| 14.2±6 | 15.5±4.7 | 0.45* | |
|
| 27.2±24.6 | 27.2±16.2 | 0.99* | |
|
| 168.4±173.8 | 171.3±116 | 0.95* | |
|
| 0.7±0.3 | 0.5±0.3 | 0.01* | 0.06 |
|
| 0.04±0.1 | 0.13±0.3 | 0.20* | |
|
| 0.3±0.2 | 0.2±0.1 | 0.10* | |
|
| 4.2±3.4 | 3.2±2.2 | 0.30* | |
|
| 1±0.2 | 1±0.1 | 0.77* |
Abbreviations: GTV = gross tumor volume; SUV = standardized uptake value; MTV = metabolic tumor volume; TLG = total lesion glycolysis; ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient*Independent Student’s t-test †Pearson’s chi-square test
Figure 6Scatterplots of the incidence of local failure with respect to the relationship between K and SUVmax.
The entire area of interest was divided into subsections (lines) using a cut-off of 0.45 min-1 for K and a cut-off of 13.76 g/mL for SUV max.
Figure 7Subgroup analysis of local control rates according to different combinations of K trans (cut-off = 0.45 min-1) and SUVmax (cut-off = 13.76 g/mL).