Literature DB >> 27876348

Characterization of an immobilized enzyme reactor for on-line protein digestion.

Stephanie Moore1, Stephanie Hess1, James Jorgenson2.   

Abstract

Despite the developments for faster liquid chromatographic and mass spectral detection techniques, the standard in-solution protein digestion for proteomic analyses has remained relatively unchanged. The typical in-solution trypsin protein digestion is usually the slowest part of the workflow, albeit one of the most important. The development of a highly efficient immobilized enzyme reactor (IMER) with rapid performance for on-line protein digestion would greatly decrease the analysis time involved in a proteomic workflow. Presented here is the development of a silica based IMER for on-line protein digestion, which produced rapid digestions in the presence of organic mobile phase for both model proteins and a complex sample consisting of the insoluble portion of a yeast cell lysate. Protein sequence coverage and identifications evaluated between the IMER and in-solution digestions were comparable. Overall, for a yeast cell lysate with only a 10s volumetric residence time on-column, the IMER identified 507 proteins while the in-solution digestion identified 490. There were no significant differences observed based on identified protein's molecular weight or isoelectric point between the two digestion methods. Implementation of the IMER into the proteomic workflow provided similar protein identification results, automation for sample analysis, and reduced the analysis time by 15h. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digestion; IMER; Immobilized enzyme; Membrane proteins; Trypsin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27876348      PMCID: PMC5136339          DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  39 in total

Review 1.  Top-down mass spectrometry of integral membrane proteins.

Authors:  Julian Whitelegge; Frederic Halgand; Puneet Souda; Vlad Zabrouskov
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Integrated sample preparation methodology for proteomics: analysis of native proteins.

Authors:  Jin-Hee Kim; Dorota Inerowicz; Vicki Hedrick; Fred Regnier
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  A capillary monolithic trypsin reactor for efficient protein digestion in online and offline coupling to ESI and MALDI mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jens Spross; Andrea Sinz
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  Overview on modern approaches to speed up protein identification workflows relying on enzymatic cleavage and mass spectrometry-based techniques.

Authors:  J L Capelo; R Carreira; M Diniz; L Fernandes; M Galesio; C Lodeiro; H M Santos; G Vale
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 6.558

5.  Integrated platform for proteome analysis with combination of protein and peptide separation via online digestion.

Authors:  Huiming Yuan; Lihua Zhang; Chunyan Hou; Guijie Zhu; Dingyin Tao; Zhen Liang; Yukui Zhang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Proteome and proteomics: new technologies, new concepts, and new words.

Authors:  N L Anderson; N G Anderson
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Comparison of protein and peptide prefractionation methods for the shotgun proteomic analysis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.

Authors:  Chee Sian Gan; Kenneth F Reardon; Phillip C Wright
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.984

8.  The detection, correlation, and comparison of peptide precursor and product ions from data independent LC-MS with data dependant LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Scott J Geromanos; Johannes P C Vissers; Jeffrey C Silva; Craig A Dorschel; Guo-Zhong Li; Marc V Gorenstein; Robert H Bateman; James I Langridge
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.984

9.  Prefractionation of intact proteins by reversed-phase and anion-exchange chromatography for the differential proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jordan T Stobaugh; Kaitlin M Fague; James W Jorgenson
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Open tubular lab-on-column/mass spectrometry for targeted proteomics of nanogram sample amounts.

Authors:  Hanne Kolsrud Hustoft; Tore Vehus; Ole Kristian Brandtzaeg; Stefan Krauss; Tyge Greibrokk; Steven Ray Wilson; Elsa Lundanes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Performance comparison of three trypsin columns used in liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Tereza Šlechtová; Martin Gilar; Květa Kalíková; Stephanie M Moore; James W Jorgenson; Eva Tesařová
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Systematic Evaluation of Immobilized Trypsin-Based Fast Protein Digestion for Deep and High-Throughput Bottom-Up Proteomics.

Authors:  Xiaojing Shen; Liangliang Sun
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Development of a multidimensional online method for the characterization and quantification of monoclonal antibodies using immobilized flow-through enzyme reactors.

Authors:  Lars M H Reinders; Martin D Klassen; Thorsten Teutenberg; Martin Jaeger; Torsten C Schmidt
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  3D-Printed High-Pressure-Resistant Immobilized Enzyme Microreactor (μIMER) for Protein Analysis.

Authors:  Tobias Rainer; Anna-Sophia Egger; Ricarda Zeindl; Martin Tollinger; Marcel Kwiatkowski; Thomas Müller
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.008

5.  Investigating Monoliths (Vinyl Azlactone-co-Ethylene Dimethacrylate) as a Support for Enzymes and Drugs, for Proteomics and Drug-Target Studies.

Authors:  Christine Olsen; Frøydis Sved Skottvoll; Ole Kristian Brandtzaeg; Christian Schnaars; Pål Rongved; Elsa Lundanes; Steven Ray Wilson
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.221

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.