| Literature DB >> 29577644 |
Xiaojing Shen1, Liangliang Sun1.
Abstract
Immobilized trypsin (IM) has been recognized as an alternative to free trypsin (FT) for accelerating protein digestion 30 years ago. However, some questions of IM still need to be answered. How does the solid matrix of IM influence its preference for protein cleavage and how well can IM perform for deep bottom-up proteomics compared to FT? By analyzing Escherichia coli proteome samples digested with amine or carboxyl functionalized magnetic bead-based IM (IM-N or IM-C) or FT, it is observed that IM-N with the nearly neutral solid matrix, IM-C with the negatively charged solid matrix, and FT have similar cleavage preference considering the microenvironment surrounding the cleavage sites. IM-N (15 min) and FT (12 h) both approach 9000 protein identifications (IDs) from a mouse brain proteome. Compared to FT, IM-N has no bias in the digestion of proteins that are involved in various biological processes, are located in different components of cells, have diverse functions, and are expressed in varying abundance. A high-throughput bottom-up proteomics workflow comprising IM-N-based rapid protein cleavage and fast CZE-MS/MS enables the completion of protein sample preparation, CZE-MS/MS analysis, and data analysis in only 3 h, resulting in 1000 protein IDs from the mouse brain proteome.Entities:
Keywords: amine functionalized magnetic bead-based immobilized trypsin; bottom-up proteomics; fast protein digestion; high-throughput proteomics; immobilized trypsin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29577644 PMCID: PMC5932237 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201700432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteomics ISSN: 1615-9853 Impact factor: 3.984