Literature DB >> 19720186

Overview on modern approaches to speed up protein identification workflows relying on enzymatic cleavage and mass spectrometry-based techniques.

J L Capelo1, R Carreira, M Diniz, L Fernandes, M Galesio, C Lodeiro, H M Santos, G Vale.   

Abstract

Recent tools addressed to accelerate the different steps of the sample treatment for protein identification in modern workflows are reviewed and critically commented in this manuscript. Heating, microspin columns, ultrasonic energy, high pressure, infrared energy, microwave energy, alternating electric fields and microreactors are outlined as useful tools that can be used to accelerate all or some of the following steps for in-gel or in-liquid based approaches for protein identification: (i) protein dissolution/denaturation, (ii) protein reduction, (iii) protein alkylation and (iv) protein digestion. The advantages and drawbacks, along with the main differences among the different tools are also commented. Future prospects for hyphenation of methods are also discussed. Researchers are informed also in this work regarding the main problems to be found when implementing any of the above mentioned methods.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19720186     DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.07.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.558


  13 in total

1.  Proteolytic Digestion and TiO2 Phosphopeptide Enrichment Microreactor for Fast MS Identification of Proteins.

Authors:  Jingren Deng; Iulia M Lazar
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Processed Meat Protein and Heat-Stable Peptide Marker Identification Using Microwave-Assisted Tryptic Digestion.

Authors:  Magdalena Montowska; Edward Pospiech
Journal:  Food Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.918

3.  Click-Engineered, Bioresponsive, and Versatile Particle-Protein-Dye System.

Authors:  Mary K Burdette; Ragini Jenkins; Yuriy P Bandera; Haley Jones; Isabell K Foulger; Ashley Dickey; Anna-Liisa Nieminen; Stephen H Foulger
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2019-07-01

4.  Characterization of an immobilized enzyme reactor for on-line protein digestion.

Authors:  Stephanie Moore; Stephanie Hess; James Jorgenson
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.759

5.  Single-Step Affinity Purification (ssAP) and Mass Spectrometry of Macromolecular Complexes in the Yeast S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Christian Trahan; Marlene Oeffinger
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  A one-step preparation method of monolithic enzyme reactor for highly efficient sample preparation coupled to mass spectrometry-based proteomics studies.

Authors:  Shan Jiang; Zichuan Zhang; Lingjun Li
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Evaluation and optimization of mass spectrometric settings during data-dependent acquisition mode: focus on LTQ-Orbitrap mass analyzers.

Authors:  Anastasia Kalli; Geoffrey T Smith; Michael J Sweredoski; Sonja Hess
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Genomics and proteomics in liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Rebekka A Hannivoort; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Scott L Friedman
Journal:  Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair       Date:  2012-01-03

9.  Identification of GPCR-interacting cytosolic proteins using HDL particles and mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach.

Authors:  Ka Young Chung; Peter W Day; Gisselle Vélez-Ruiz; Roger K Sunahara; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can electromagnetic fields influence the structure and enzymatic digest of proteins? A critical evaluation of microwave-assisted proteomics protocols.

Authors:  Markus Damm; Christoph Nusshold; David Cantillo; Gerald N Rechberger; Karl Gruber; Wolfgang Sattler; C Oliver Kappe
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.