Literature DB >> 27872938

Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler: value of penetrating vessels as a predictor of malignancy.

Rositaa Ibrahim1, Kartini Rahmat1, Farhana Fadzli1, Faizatul Izza Rozalli1, Caroline Judy Westerhout1, Kasumawati Alli1, Anushya Vijayananthan1, Fatimah Moosa1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the vascular pattern of solid breast lesions using power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) and assess whether the presence of intratumoural penetrating vessels can predict breast cancer malignancy.
METHODS: Greyscale ultrasonography (US) and PDUS were prospectively performed on 91 women in Malaysia with histopathologically proven breast lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of greyscale US, PDUS, and both greyscale US and PDUS was calculated and compared.
RESULTS: The 91 women had 102 breast lesions (55 benign, 47 malignant). Of the 47 malignant lesions, 36 demonstrated intratumoural penetrating vessels. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of greyscale US findings in diagnosing malignancy were 100.0%, 71.4%, 74.1% and 100.0%, respectively. The presence of calcification in the breast lesion and the margin, shape and posterior acoustic features of the lesion were significant parameters in predicting malignancy (p < 0.01). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the presence of intratumoural penetrating vessels in predicting malignancy were 76.5%, 80.0%, 76.5% and 80.0%, respectively. When both greyscale US and PDUS were used, there was a significant correlation in predicting malignancy (p < 0.05). The specificity and PPV values of the combined greyscale US and PDUS method (89.0% and 85.7%, respectively) were higher than those of greyscale US or PDUS alone.
CONCLUSION: Flow patterns revealed by PDUS can be useful for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. The visualisation of penetrating vessels in solid breast lesions can be used to complement greyscale US findings in predicting malignancy. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; penetrating vessel; power Doppler; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27872938      PMCID: PMC5331140          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  23 in total

1.  Palpable breast lesions: utility of Doppler sonography for diagnosis of malignancy.

Authors:  A Piñero; M Reus; J Illana; I Durán; E Martínez-Barba; M Canteras; P Parrilla
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.

Authors:  Andrea S Hong; Eric L Rosen; Mary S Soo; Jay A Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.

Authors:  Sharifah Majedah Idrus Alhabshi; Kartini Rahmat; Nurazidawati Abdul Halim; Suraya Aziz; Sridharan Radhika; Gek Choo Gan; Anushya Vijayananthan; Caroline Judy Westerhout; Mohammad Nazri Mohd-Shah; Saladina Jaszle; Nani Harlina Mohd Latar; Rohaizak Muhammad
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler sonography.

Authors:  S H Kook; H W Park; Y R Lee; Y U Lee; W K Pae; Y L Park
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.910

Review 6.  Use of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  T S Mehta; S Raza; J K Baum
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.875

7.  Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent-initial experience.

Authors:  W K Moon; J G Im; D Y Noh; M C Han
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Power Doppler sonography: evaluation of solid breast lesions and correlation with lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Jin Young Kwak; Eun-Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Seon Hyeong Choi; Eunju Son; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.605

9.  Color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses.

Authors:  M M McNicholas; P M Mercer; J C Miller; E W McDermott; N J O'Higgins; D P MacErlean
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Power Doppler sonography: anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?

Authors:  Gokhan Gokalp; Ugur Topal; Esref Kizilkaya
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiopathological characteristics and outcomes of phyllodes tumor of the breast in Malaysian women.

Authors:  Shamsiah Abdul Hamid; Kartini Rahmat; Marlina Tanty Ramli; Farhana Fadzli; Suniza Jamaris; Mee Hoong See; Kean Hooi Teoh; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.