Literature DB >> 10355886

Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler sonography.

S H Kook1, H W Park, Y R Lee, Y U Lee, W K Pae, Y L Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the abilities of power and conventional color Doppler sonography to depict the vascularity of solid breast lesions and evaluated the usefulness of power Doppler sonography in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions.
METHODS: One hundred two solid breast lesions (59 benign and 43 malignant lesions) were studied with power and color Doppler sonography. Power and color Doppler sonograms were retrospectively compared for the depiction of blood flow signals. Power Doppler images were also reviewed for the amount of Doppler signals, pattern of vascularity, and morphology of vessels. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 2 techniques were calculated.
RESULTS: Compared with color Doppler sonography, power Doppler sonography depicted flow superiorly in 61 cases (60%) and equally in 41 cases (40%). On power Doppler sonography, the incidence of marked blood flow in malignant lesions (65%) was higher than that in benign lesions (39%). The pattern of vascularity was predominantly central (86%) and/or penetrating (65%) more often in malignant lesions than in benign lesions (51% and 34%, respectively). Branching (56%) and disordered vessels (42%) were seen more often in malignant lesions than in benign lesions (22% and 8%, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing malignancy were 64%, 76%, and 71%, respectively, for power Doppler sonography and 77%, 76%, and 76% for color Doppler sonography.
CONCLUSIONS: Power Doppler sonography was more sensitive than color Doppler sonography in the detection of flow in solid breast lesions. Although power Doppler sonography was not more effective in diagnosing malignant lesions, central and penetrating vascularity patterns and branching and disordered vessels seem to be helpful findings in predicting malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10355886     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199906)27:5<231::aid-jcu2>3.0.co;2-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  9 in total

1.  Breast imaging: A survey.

Authors:  Subbhuraam Vinitha Sree; Eddie Yin-Kwee Ng; Rajendra U Acharya; Oliver Faust
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-10

2.  Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler: value of penetrating vessels as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  Rositaa Ibrahim; Kartini Rahmat; Farhana Fadzli; Faizatul Izza Rozalli; Caroline Judy Westerhout; Kasumawati Alli; Anushya Vijayananthan; Fatimah Moosa
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Combined Use of Shear Wave Elastography, Microvascular Doppler Ultrasound Technique, and BI-RADS for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Yu-Yuan Chen; Si Yang; Zhen-Wen Chen; Jia Luo; Xin-Wu Cui; Christoph F Dietrich; Ai-Jiao Yi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Superb microvascular imaging in diagnosis of breast lesions: a comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic microvascular imaging.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Xiao; Xin Chen; Xiao-Feng Guan; Huan Wu; Wei Qin; Bao-Ming Luo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Value of power Doppler and gray-scale US in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: contribution of cross-sectional area just before the tunnel inlet as compared with the cross-sectional area at the tunnel.

Authors:  Nevbahar Akcar; Serhat Ozkan; Ozlem Mehmetoglu; Cuneyt Calisir; Baki Adapinar
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Evaluation of different aspects of power Doppler sonography in differentiating and prognostication of breast masses.

Authors:  Mehri Sirous; Reza Sirous; Farnaz Khalighi Nejad; Elham Rabeie; Marzieh Mansouri
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities.

Authors:  Ah Young Park; Myoungae Kwon; Ok Hee Woo; Kyu Ran Cho; Eun Kyung Park; Sang Hoon Cha; Sung Eun Song; Ju Han Lee; JaeHyung Cha; Gil Soo Son; Bo Kyoung Seo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  An Innovative Ultrasound Technique for Evaluation of Tumor Vascularity in Breast Cancers: Superb Micro-Vascular Imaging.

Authors:  Ah Young Park; Bo Kyoung Seo; Sang Hoon Cha; Suk Keu Yeom; Seung Wha Lee; Hwan Hoon Chung
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.588

Review 9.  Up-to-date Doppler techniques for breast tumor vascularity: superb microvascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Ah Young Park; Bo Kyoung Seo
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-08-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.