Literature DB >> 23384468

Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.

Sharifah Majedah Idrus Alhabshi1, Kartini Rahmat, Nurazidawati Abdul Halim, Suraya Aziz, Sridharan Radhika, Gek Choo Gan, Anushya Vijayananthan, Caroline Judy Westerhout, Mohammad Nazri Mohd-Shah, Saladina Jaszle, Nani Harlina Mohd Latar, Rohaizak Muhammad.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of qualitative and semi-quantitative assessment of ultrasound elastography in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. This prospective study was conducted in two tertiary medical centers. Consecutive B-mode ultrasound and real-time elastographic images were obtained for 67 malignant and 101 benign breast lesions in 168 women. Four experienced radiologists analyzed B-mode ultrasound alone and B-mode ultrasound combined with elastography independently. Conventional ultrasound findings were classified according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification. The elastographic assessment was based on qualitative and semi-quantitative parameters (i.e., strain pattern, width ratio, strain ratio). The sensitivity and specificity of combined elastography and conventional ultrasound were significantly higher than that of conventional ultrasound alone. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value was 97%, 61.4%, 62.5% and 96.8%, respectively, for conventional ultrasound and 100%, 93%, 99% and 90%, respectively, for combined technique. The semi-quantitative assessment with strain ratio and width ratio in elastography were the most useful parameters in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. Cut-off point values for width ratio of more than 1.1 and strain ratio of more than 5.6 showed a high predictive value of malignancy with specificities of 84% and 76%, respectively (p < 0.001). This combined technique also had the best results in detecting carcinoma and could reduce the need of unnecessary biopsy for benign lesions with indeterminate or equivocal features.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23384468     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  17 in total

1.  Ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance examinations are effective for the accurate diagnosis of mammary duct ectasia.

Authors:  Feixue Zhang; Dexin Yu; Mingming Guo; Qing Wang; Zhigang Yu; Fei Zhou; Meng Zhao; Feng Xue; Guangrui Shao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 2.  JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: breast.

Authors:  Kazutaka Nakashima; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Masaru Sakurai; Katsutoshi Enokido; Tokiko Endo; Hiroko Tsunoda; Etsuo Takada; Takeshi Umemoto; Ei Ueno
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler: value of penetrating vessels as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  Rositaa Ibrahim; Kartini Rahmat; Farhana Fadzli; Faizatul Izza Rozalli; Caroline Judy Westerhout; Kasumawati Alli; Anushya Vijayananthan; Fatimah Moosa
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  David Rosen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Stiffness of the surrounding tissue of breast lesions evaluated by ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  JianQiao Zhou; WeiWei Zhan; YiJie Dong; ZhiFang Yang; Chun Zhou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Can strain US-elastography with strain ratio (SRE) improve the diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of breast lesions? Preliminary results.

Authors:  Daniela Elia; Daniele Fresilli; Patrizia Pacini; Sara Cardaccio; Giorgia Polti; Olga Guiban; Ilaria Celletti; Eriselda Kutrolli; Carlo De Felice; Rossella Occhiato; Corrado De Vito; Maria Ida Amabile; Alessandro De Luca; Vito D'Andrea; Massimo Vergine; Federica Pediconi; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio; Vito Cantisani
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-07-10

7.  Endorectal ultrasonography, strain elastography and MRI differentiation of rectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  J E R Waage; S Leh; C Røsler; F Pfeffer; S P Bach; R F Havre; I S Haldorsen; S Ødegaard; G Baatrup
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Shearwave Elastography Increases Diagnostic Accuracy in Characterization of Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Wei Lin Ng; Kartini Rahmat; Farhana Fadzli; Faizatul Izza Rozalli; Mohammad Nazri Mohd-Shah; Patricia Ann Chandran; Caroline Judy Westerhout; Anushya Vijayananthan; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Added value of strain elastography in the characterisation of breast lesions: A prospective study.

Authors:  Dimpi Sinha; Sukrity Sharma; Nischal G Kundaragi; Sudhir Kumar Kale
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-03-16

10.  Interobserver and intermethod variability in data interpretation of breast strain elastography in suspicious breast lesions

Authors:  Hale Turnaoğlu; Kemal Murat Haberal; Serdar Arslan; Meriç Yavuz Çolak; Funda Ulu Öztürk; Nihal Uslu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 0.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.