Literature DB >> 18243623

Power Doppler sonography: anything to add to BI-RADS US in solid breast masses?

Gokhan Gokalp1, Ugur Topal, Esref Kizilkaya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) to breast imaging reporting and data system ultrasonography (BI-RADS US) categorization of solid breast masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally 94 solid lesions with histopathological results in 49 patients were included in the study. US features of the lesions were classified according to American College of Radiologists (ACR) BI-RADS US lexicon. Lesions were evaluated qualitatively according to their PDUS properties and quantitatively with spectral analysis. Hypervascularity, penetration of vessels into the mass or branching-disordered course and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 were accepted as probable malignant criteria.
RESULTS: Fifty-five of 94 lesions were benign (58.5%), while 39 (41.5%) were malignant histopathologically. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of US and PDUS in the diagnosis of malignant lesions were 100%, 58.2%, 62.9%, 100% and 71.8%, 81.8%, 73.7%, 80.4%, respectively. Criteria used for the distinction of malignant and benign lesions like number of vessels (p<0.05), distribution of tumoral vessels, morphology of vessels and resistivity index values higher than 0.85 showed statistically significant difference (p<0.001). When sonographic findings were combined with PDUS and spectral analysis findings, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 100%, 52.7%, 60% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: PDUS and spectral analysis have no contribution to BI-RADS US. For the spectral analysis, when RI value is one or greater, malignancy risk significantly increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18243623     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  10 in total

1.  Ultrasensitive Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging for Characterizing Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors.

Authors:  Ping Gong; Pengfei Song; Chengwu Huang; U-Wai Lok; Shanshan Tang; Yue Yu; Duane D Meixner; Kathryn J Ruddy; Karthik Ghosh; Robert T Fazzio; Wenwu Ling; Shigao Chen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler: value of penetrating vessels as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  Rositaa Ibrahim; Kartini Rahmat; Farhana Fadzli; Faizatul Izza Rozalli; Caroline Judy Westerhout; Kasumawati Alli; Anushya Vijayananthan; Fatimah Moosa
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Diagnosis of solid breast tumors using vessel analysis in three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound images.

Authors:  Yan-Hao Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Yeun-Chung Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Woo Kyung Moon; Wen-Jia Kuo; Kuan-Ju Lai; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Superb microvascular imaging in diagnosis of breast lesions: a comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic microvascular imaging.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Xiao; Xin Chen; Xiao-Feng Guan; Huan Wu; Wei Qin; Bao-Ming Luo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Appearance of breast masses on sonoelastography with special focus on the diagnosis of fibroadenomas.

Authors:  Eduardo F C Fleury; Jose F Rinaldi; Sebastiao Piato; Jose Carlos V Fleury; Decio Roveda Junior
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Evaluation of different aspects of power Doppler sonography in differentiating and prognostication of breast masses.

Authors:  Mehri Sirous; Reza Sirous; Farnaz Khalighi Nejad; Elham Rabeie; Marzieh Mansouri
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Novel approach in the evaluation of ultrasound BI-RADS 3 & 4 breast masses with a combination method of elastography & Doppler.

Authors:  Anjuna Reghunath; Mahesh Kumar Mittal; Chintamani Chintamani; Rajni Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

8.  Can Doppler or contrast-enhanced ultrasound analysis add diagnostically important information about the nature of breast lesions?

Authors:  Daniela Stanzani; Luciano F Chala; Nestor de Barros; Giovanni G Cerri; Maria Cristina Chammas
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Cystic breast lesions by conventional ultrasonography: sonographic subtype-pathologic correlation and BI-RADS Assessment.

Authors:  Man Chen; Wei Wei Zhan; Wen Ping Wang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  A Simple Ultrasound Based Classification Algorithm Allows Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions by Using Only Quantitative Parameters.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kapetas; Ramona Woitek; Paola Clauser; Maria Bernathova; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.488

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.