Literature DB >> 11012451

Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent-initial experience.

W K Moon1, J G Im, D Y Noh, M C Han.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate power Doppler ultrasonography (US) performed with a microbubble US contrast agent in the differentiation of nonpalpable breast lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty nonpalpable breast lesions in 50 patients were prospectively evaluated with power Doppler US before and after injection of the contrast agent SH U 508A. Lesion vascularity and the morphology of vessels on US scans were analyzed and were correlated with histologic results.
RESULTS: Surgical excision revealed 22 cancers and 28 benign lesions. At nonenhanced power Doppler US, eight (36%) of 22 cancers and four (14%) of 28 benign lesions were vascular. At contrast agent-enhanced power Doppler US, 21 (95%) cancers and six (21%) benign lesions were vascular (P <.001). Irregular vessels were seen in three cancers and one benign lesion at nonenhanced power Doppler US and in 11 cancers and one benign lesion at contrast-enhanced power Doppler US. By using the presence of vascularity in the mass as the diagnostic criterion for malignancy, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of power Doppler US changed from 36%, 86%, 67%, and 63%, respectively, to 95%, 79%, 78%, and 96% after contrast agent injection.
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced power Doppler US was superior to nonenhanced power Doppler US in the demonstration and characterization of tumor vascularity in nonpalpable breast lesions. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler US may be useful for the differentiation between nonpalpable breast cancers and benign tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11012451     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc03240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

1.  US-guided diffuse optical tomography for breast lesions: the reliability of clinical experience.

Authors:  Min Jung Kim; Ji Youn Kim; Jung Hyun Youn; Myung Hyun Kim; Hye Ryoung Koo; Soo Jin Kim; Yu-Mee Sohn; Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Imaging of molecular structures of breasts with new sonography techniques].

Authors:  M Reisegger; G Schueller; R Gruber; K Pinker; C Riedl; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Diagnosis of sub-centimetre breast lesions: combining BI-RADS-US with strain elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-a preliminary study in China.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Xiao; Qiongchao Jiang; Huan Wu; Xiaofeng Guan; Wei Qin; Baoming Luo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Papillary breast lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: morphological enhancement patterns and diagnostic strategy.

Authors:  Han-Sheng Xia; Xi Wang; Hong Ding; Jie-Xian Wen; Pei-Li Fan; Wen-Ping Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler: value of penetrating vessels as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  Rositaa Ibrahim; Kartini Rahmat; Farhana Fadzli; Faizatul Izza Rozalli; Caroline Judy Westerhout; Kasumawati Alli; Anushya Vijayananthan; Fatimah Moosa
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound: Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kapetas; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Georg J Wengert; Mathias Lazar; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.

Authors:  Adam B Nover; Shami Jagtap; Waqas Anjum; Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-12-28

9.  Breast imaging in the new era.

Authors:  K Planche; S Vinnicombe
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Optical imaging for breast cancer prescreening.

Authors:  Anuradha Godavarty; Suset Rodriguez; Young-Jin Jung; Stephanie Gonzalez
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2015-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.