Literature DB >> 30393751

Developing Predictive or Prognostic Biomarkers for Charged Particle Radiotherapy.

Michael D Story1, Jing Wang1.   

Abstract

The response to radiotherapy can vary greatly among individuals, even though advances in technology allow for the highly localized placement of therapeutic doses of radiation to a tumor. This variability in patient response to radiation is biologically driven, but the individuality of tumor and healthy tissue biology are not used to create individual treatment plans. Biomarkers of radiosensitivity, whether intrinsic or from hypoxia, would move radiation oncology from precision medicine to precise, personalized medicine. Charged particle radiotherapy allows for even greater dose conformity, but the biological advantages of charged particle radiotherapy have not yet been cultivated. The development of biomarkers that would drive biologically based clinical trials, identify patients for whom charged particles are most appropriate, or aid in particle-selection strategies could be envisioned with appropriate biomarkers. Initially, biomarkers for low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation responses should be tested against charged particles. Biomarkers of tumor radioresistance to low-LET radiations could be used to identify patients for whom the enhanced relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of charged particles would be more effective compared with low-LET radiations and those for whom specific DNA-repair inhibitors, in combination with charged particles, may also be appropriate. Furthermore, heavy charged particles can overcome the radioresistance of hypoxic tumors when used at the appropriate LET. Biomarkers for hypoxia could identify hypoxic tumors and, in combination with imaging, define hypoxic regions of a tumor for specific ion selection. Moreover, because of the enhanced RBE for charged particles, the risk for adverse healthy tissue effects may be greater, even though charged particles have greater tumor conformality. There are many validated healthy-tissue biomarkers available to test against charged particle exposures. Lastly, newer biological techniques, as well as newer bioinformatic and computational methods, are rapidly changing the landscape for biomarker identification, validation, and clinical trial design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; charged particles; hypoxia; radioresistance; radiotherapy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30393751      PMCID: PMC6214484          DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-18-00027.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Part Ther        ISSN: 2331-5180


  68 in total

Review 1.  Assessing gene-gene interactions in pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Hsien-Yuan Lane; Guochuan E Tsai; Eugene Lin
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Establishment of a Radiogenomics Consortium.

Authors:  Catharine West; Barry S Rosenstein; Jan Alsner; David Azria; Gillian Barnett; Adrian Begg; Søren Bentzen; Neil Burnet; Jenny Chang-Claude; Eric Chuang; Charlotte Coles; Kim De Ruyck; Dirk De Ruysscher; Alison Dunning; Rebecca Elliott; Laura Fachal; Janet Hall; Karin Haustermans; Carsten Herskind; Tobias Hoelscher; Takashi Imai; Mayumi Iwakawa; Don Jones; Cecilia Kulich; Jan-Hans Langendijk; Peter O'Neils; Mahmut Ozsahin; Matthew Parliament; Andrzej Polanski; Barry Rosenstein; Daniela Seminara; Paul Symonds; Chris Talbot; Hubert Thierens; Ana Vega; Catherine West; John Yarnold
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  The Quest for Evidence for Proton Therapy: Model-Based Approach and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Joachim Widder; Arjen van der Schaaf; Philippe Lambin; Corrie A M Marijnen; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Coen R Rasch; Ben J Slotman; Marcel Verheij; Johannes A Langendijk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Near Real-Time Processing of Proteomics Data Using Hadoop.

Authors:  Chris Hillman; Yasmeen Ahmad; Mark Whitehorn; Andy Cobley
Journal:  Big Data       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.128

5.  Vision 20/20: Automation and advanced computing in clinical radiation oncology.

Authors:  Kevin L Moore; George C Kagadis; Todd R McNutt; Vitali Moiseenko; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Pablo Botas; Drosoula Giantsoudi; Bram L Gorissen; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Modeling pathologic response of esophageal cancer to chemoradiation therapy using spatial-temporal 18F-FDG PET features, clinical parameters, and demographics.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Shan Tan; Wengen Chen; Seth Kligerman; Grace Kim; Warren D D'Souza; Mohan Suntharalingam; Wei Lu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The REQUITE project: validating predictive models and biomarkers of radiotherapy toxicity to reduce side-effects and improve quality of life in cancer survivors.

Authors:  C West; D Azria; J Chang-Claude; S Davidson; P Lambin; B Rosenstein; D De Ruysscher; C Talbot; H Thierens; R Valdagni; A Vega; M Yuille
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Development of novel breast cancer recurrence prediction model using support vector machine.

Authors:  Woojae Kim; Ku Sang Kim; Jeong Eon Lee; Dong-Young Noh; Sung-Won Kim; Yong Sik Jung; Man Young Park; Rae Woong Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Female erectile tissues and sexual dysfunction after pelvic radiotherapy: A scoping review.

Authors:  Deborah C Marshall; Elizabeth S Tarras; Ayesha Ali; Julie Bloom; Mylin A Torres; Jenna M Kahn
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 286.130

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.