Literature DB >> 28826292

Radiobiological issues in proton therapy.

Radhe Mohan1, Christopher R Peeler1, Fada Guan1, Lawrence Bronk1, Wenhua Cao1, David R Grosshans1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for particle therapy is a complex function of particle type, radiation dose, linear energy transfer (LET), cell type, endpoint, etc. In the clinical practice of proton therapy, the RBE is assumed to have a fixed value of 1.1. This assumption, along with the effects of physical uncertainties, may mean that the biologically effective dose distributions received by the patient may be significantly different from what is seen on treatment plans. This may contribute to unforeseen toxicities and/or failure to control the disease. Variability of Proton RBE: It has been shown experimentally that proton RBE varies significantly along the beam path, especially near the end of the particle range. While there is now an increasing acceptance that proton RBE is variable, there is an ongoing debate about whether to change the current clinical practice. Clinical Evidence: A rationale against the change is the uncertainty in the models of variable RBE. Secondly, so far there is no clear clinical evidence of the harm of assuming proton RBE to be 1.1. It is conceivable, however, that the evidence is masked partially by physical uncertainties. It is, therefore, plausible that reduction in uncertainties and their incorporation in the estimation of dose actually delivered may isolate and reveal the variability of RBE in clinical practice. Nevertheless, clinical evidence of RBE variability is slowly emerging as more patients are treated with protons and their response data are analyzed. Modelling and Incorporation of RBE in the Optimization of Proton Therapy: The improvement in the knowledge of RBE could lead to better understanding of outcomes of proton therapy and in the improvement of models to predict RBE. Prospectively, the incorporation of such models in the optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy could lead to improvements in the therapeutic ratio of proton therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28826292      PMCID: PMC5842809          DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1348621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  31 in total

1.  A phenomenological model for the relative biological effectiveness in therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  J J Wilkens; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Imaging Changes in Pediatric Intracranial Ependymoma Patients Treated With Proton Beam Radiation Therapy Compared to Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Jillian R Gunther; Mariko Sato; Murali Chintagumpala; Leena Ketonen; Jeremy Y Jones; Pamela K Allen; Arnold C Paulino; M Fatih Okcu; Jack M Su; Jeffrey Weinberg; Nicholas S Boehling; Soumen Khatua; Adekunle Adesina; Robert Dauser; William E Whitehead; Anita Mahajan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Optimization of radiobiological effects in intensity modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Jan J Wilkens; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Combined use of Monte Carlo DNA damage simulations and deterministic repair models to examine putative mechanisms of cell killing.

Authors:  David J Carlson; Robert D Stewart; Vladimir A Semenenko; George A Sandison
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  A microdosimetric-kinetic model of cell death from exposure to ionizing radiation of any LET, with experimental and clinical applications.

Authors:  R B Hawkins
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 6.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Long term outcomes of patients with skull-base low-grade chondrosarcoma and chordoma patients treated with pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Damien C Weber; Robert Malyapa; Francesca Albertini; Alessandra Bolsi; Ulrike Kliebsch; Marc Walser; Alessia Pica; Christophe Combescure; Antony J Lomax; Ralf Schneider
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Incidence and dosimetric parameters of pediatric brainstem toxicity following proton therapy.

Authors:  Daniel J Indelicato; Stella Flampouri; Ronny L Rotondo; Julie A Bradley; Christopher G Morris; Philipp R Aldana; Eric Sandler; Nancy P Mendenhall
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Reoptimization of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans Based on Linear Energy Transfer.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Pablo Botas; Drosoula Giantsoudi; Bram L Gorissen; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Towards Achieving the Full Clinical Potential of Proton Therapy by Inclusion of LET and RBE Models.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years?

Authors:  Hakan Nystrom; Maria Fuglsang Jensen; Petra Witt Nystrom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  The relative biological effectiveness of proton irradiation in dependence of DNA damage repair.

Authors:  Simon Deycmar; Erica Faccin; Tamara Kazimova; Philip A Knobel; Irma Telarovic; Fabienne Tschanz; Verena Waller; Rona Winkler; Carmen Yong; Dario Zingariello; Martin Pruschy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Proton Therapy for Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer: Initial Clinical Experience at the University of Washington.

Authors:  Saif Aljabab; Andrew Liu; Tony Wong; Jay J Liao; George E Laramore; Upendra Parvathaneni
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2019-12-19

4.  Linear energy transfer weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Dan Ruan; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Proton Therapy for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancers of the Head and Neck: a De-Intensification Strategy.

Authors:  Nicolette Taku; Li Wang; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; William H Morrison; C David Fuller; Jack Phan; Jay P Reddy; Amy C Moreno; Michael T Spiotto; Gregory Chronowski; Shalin J Shah; Lauren L Mayo; Neil D Gross; Renata Ferrarotto; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang; Steven J Frank
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 6.  Relative biological effectiveness in proton beam therapy - Current knowledge and future challenges.

Authors:  Armin Lühr; Cläre von Neubeck; Mechthild Krause; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 7.  The Radiobiological Effects of Proton Beam Therapy: Impact on DNA Damage and Repair.

Authors:  Eirini Terpsi Vitti; Jason L Parsons
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  RBE Model-Based Biological Dose Optimization for Proton Radiobiology Studies.

Authors:  Fada Guan; Changran Geng; Duo Ma; Lawrence Bronk; Matthew Kerr; Yuting Li; Drake Gates; Benjamin Kroger; Narayan Sahoo; Uwe Titt; David Grosshans; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 9.  Future Perspectives of Proton Therapy in Minimizing the Toxicity of Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marika Musielak; Wiktoria M Suchorska; Magdalena Fundowicz; Piotr Milecki; Julian Malicki
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-13

10.  Clinical outcomes of image-guided proton therapy for histologically confirmed stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Koichiro Nakajima; Hiromitsu Iwata; Hiroyuki Ogino; Yukiko Hattori; Shingo Hashimoto; Toshiyuki Toshito; Kensuke Hayashi; Kenji Akita; Fumiya Baba; Katsumi Nakamae; Jun-Etsu Mizoe; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.