Literature DB >> 27857080

Survey of UK dentists regarding the use of CAD/CAM technology.

D Tran1, M Nesbit, H Petridis2.   

Abstract

Statement of the problem Digital workflows (CAD/CAM) have been introduced in dentistry during recent years. No published information exists on dentists' use and reporting of this technology.Purpose The purpose of this survey was to identify the infiltration of CAD/CAM technology in UK dental practices and to investigate the relationship of various demographic factors to the answers regarding use or non-use of this technology.Materials and methods One thousand and thirty-one online surveys were sent to a sample of UK dentists composing of both users and non-users of CAD/CAM. It aimed to reveal information regarding type of usage, materials, perceived benefits, barriers to access, and disadvantages of CAD/CAM dentistry. Statistical analysis was undertaken to test the influence of various demographic variables such as country of work, dentist experience, level of training and type of work (NHS or private).Results The number of completed responses totalled 385. Most of the respondents did not use any part of a digital workflow, and the main barriers to CAD/CAM use were initial costs and a lack of perceived benefit over conventional methods. Dentists delivering mostly private work were most likely to have adopted CAD/CAM technology (P <0.001). Further training also correlated with a greater likelihood of CAD/CAM usage (P <0.001). Most users felt that the technology had led to a change in the use of dental materials, leading to increased use of, for example, zirconia and lithium disilicate. Most users were trained either by companies or self-trained, and a third felt that their training was insufficient. The majority of respondents (89%) felt that CAD/CAM had a big role to play in the future.Conclusion Most of the respondents did not use any part of a digital workflow. However, the majority of surveyed dentists were interested in incorporating CAD/CAM into their workflow, while most believed that it will have a big role in the future. There are still some concerns from dentists about the quality of chairside CAD/CAM restorations while the costs are still in the main hugely prohibitive (especially for NHS dentistry).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27857080     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  26 in total

1.  Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.

Authors:  David P Sarment; Predrag Sukovic; Neal Clinthorne
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition.

Authors:  Juergen Manhart; Hongyan Chen; Gerald Hamm; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  The aesthetics of all-ceramic veneered and monolithic CAD/CAM crowns.

Authors:  M Herrguth; M Wichmann; S Reich
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 4.  Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations.

Authors:  Dennis J Fasbinder
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 5.  All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).

Authors:  Irena Sailer; Nikolay Alexandrovich Makarov; Daniel Stefan Thoma; Marcel Zwahlen; Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 6.  CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures.

Authors:  Theodoros Kapos; Christopher Evans
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: A review of the literature.

Authors:  A J Raigrodski; G J Chiche
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.

Authors:  Oguz Ozan; Ilser Turkyilmaz; Ahmet Ersan Ersoy; Edwin A McGlumphy; Stephen F Rosenstiel
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery and fabrication of an immediately loaded prosthesis for a partially edentulous patient.

Authors:  Christopher B Marchack
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Communication methods and production techniques in fixed prosthesis fabrication: a UK based survey. Part 1: communication methods.

Authors:  J Berry; M Nesbit; S Saberi; H Petridis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

View more
  9 in total

1.  Dental practice in the UK in 2015/2016. Part 3: aspects of indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics.

Authors:  A A Jum'ah; S Creanor; N H F Wilson; F J T Burke; P A Brunton
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Survey on the use of CAD-CAM technology by UK and Irish dental technicians.

Authors:  E Blackwell; M Nesbit; H Petridis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Dental professionals' opinions and knowledge of smoking cessation and electronic cigarettes: a cross-sectional survey in the north of England.

Authors:  Z Ahmed; P M Preshaw; L Bauld; R Holliday
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability.

Authors:  O Schubert; J Schweiger; M Stimmelmayr; E Nold; J-F Güth
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Repeatability of Intraoral Scanners for Complete Arch Scan of Partially Edentulous Dentitions: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Je-Hyeon Yun; Jung-Suk Han; In-Sung Luke Yeo; Hyung-In Yoon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  A Survey of Dentists' Perception of Chair-Side CAD/CAM Technology.

Authors:  Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Shukran Ibraheem; Enass Shamsy; Mahmoud Darwish; Asmaa Faden; Omar Kujan
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13

7.  The Use of Modern Technologies by Dentists in Poland: Questionnaire among Polish Dentists.

Authors:  Mateusz Świtała; Wojciech Zakrzewski; Zbigniew Rybak; Maria Szymonowicz; Maciej Dobrzyński
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25

8.  Bias Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Extraoral Scanners and an Intraoral Scanner Based on ADA Standards.

Authors:  Naiyu Cui; Jiayin Wang; Xingyu Hou; Shixun Sun; Qixuan Huang; Ho-Kyung Lim; HongXin Cai; Qi Jia; Eui-Seok Lee; Heng Bo Jiang
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.932

9.  Attitudes of the Students from the School of Dental Medicine in Zagreb towards CAD/CAM.

Authors:  Mia Maltar; Lucija Miloš; Slađana Milardović; Ines Kovačić; Sanja Peršić; Ivana Juroš; Josip Kranjčić
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2018-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.