Literature DB >> 30679852

Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability.

O Schubert1, J Schweiger1, M Stimmelmayr1, E Nold1, J-F Güth1.   

Abstract

Modern oral implantology and implant prosthetics depend on comprehensive diagnostics and precise planning to ensure the desired outcome and meet the patient's and the dentist's expectations. In this context, digital implant planning and guided implant surgery based on three-dimensional radiographic data and the digitised intraoral surfaces can be of excellent service. They provide valuable information and permit stringent backward planning to optimise the implantological and prosthetic result, improving the safety and efficiency of the surgical procedure and rendering the restorative outcome more predictable in terms of function, biology and aesthetics. However, template-guided implant surgery carries its own specific risks in terms of manufacturing inaccuracies and application errors. These possible sources of error must be recognised and carefully considered in order to avoid adverse consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30679852     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  67 in total

1.  CBCT device dependency on the transfer accuracy from computer-aided implantology procedures.

Authors:  Timo Dreiseidler; Daniel Tandon; Matthias Kreppel; Jörg Neugebauer; Robert A Mischkowski; Max J Zinser; Joachim E Zöller
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery--a review.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Reto Josef Bale
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  A model study on flapless implant placement by clinicians with a different experience level in implant surgery.

Authors:  Tommie Van de Velde; Fadi Glor; Hugo De Bruyn
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 4.  Implant survival rates, marginal bone level changes, and complications in full-mouth rehabilitation with flapless computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Moraschini; G Velloso; D Luz; E Porto Barboza
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 5.  Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Fernando Bover-Ramos; José Viña-Almunia; Juan Cervera-Ballester; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; Berta García-Mira
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Survey of UK dentists regarding the use of CAD/CAM technology.

Authors:  D Tran; M Nesbit; H Petridis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 7.  Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review.

Authors:  Pekka Ahlholm; Kirsi Sipilä; Pekka Vallittu; Minna Jakonen; Ulla Kotiranta
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides.

Authors:  Nathaniel E Farley; Kelly Kennedy; Edwin A McGlumphy; Nancy L Clelland
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Analysis of the occlusal stress transmitted to the inferior alveolar nerve by an osseointegrated threaded fixture.

Authors:  G Sammartino; G Marenzi; R Citarella; R Ciccarelli; H-L Wang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 10.  Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Marco Colombo; Carlo Mangano; Eitan Mijiritsky; Mischa Krebs; Uli Hauschild; Thomas Fortin
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Time and costs related to computer-assisted versus non-computer-assisted implant planning and surgery. A systematic review.

Authors:  Tobias Graf; Christine Keul; Daniel Wismeijer; Jan Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.021

Review 2.  Digital implantology-a review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery. Part II: Prosthetic set-up and virtual implant planning.

Authors:  Tabea Flügge; Jaap Kramer; Katja Nelson; Susanne Nahles; Florian Kernen
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Efficiency of occlusal and interproximal adjustments in CAD-CAM manufactured single implant crowns - cast-free vs 3D printed cast-based.

Authors:  Tobias Graf; Jan-Frederik Güth; Christian Diegritz; Anja Liebermann; Josef Schweiger; Oliver Schubert
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Robert Stünkel; Alexander-Nicolai Zeller; Thomas Bohne; Florian Böhrnsen; Edris Wedi; David Raschke; Philipp Kauffmann
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.