Literature DB >> 27853323

Ancient texts to PubMed: a brief history of the peer-review process.

P R Farrell1, L Magida Farrell2, M K Farrell3.   

Abstract

The formal evaluation of scientific literature by invited referees (peer reviewers) is a relatively recent phenomenon and now is considered a cornerstone of modern science. However, its roots can be traced back to antiquity. As the speed and complexity of scientific information and publishing increases in the digital age, peer review must continue to evolve. To understand the future direction of peer review, we must understand its past. Here, we briefly explore the history of scientific peer review. This may help us predict and design appropriate peer review for the new era. This work was originally presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting in Baltimore, Maryland in the Spring of 2016.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27853323     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  10 in total

1.  The history of the peer-review process.

Authors:  Ray Spier
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.

Authors:  Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Who's afraid of peer review?

Authors:  John Bohannon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism.

Authors:  D A Kronick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The evolution of editorial peer review.

Authors:  J C Burnham
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The ups and downs of peer review.

Authors:  Dale J Benos; Edlira Bashari; Jose M Chaves; Amit Gaggar; Niren Kapoor; Martin LaFrance; Robert Mans; David Mayhew; Sara McGowan; Abigail Polter; Yawar Qadri; Shanta Sarfare; Kevin Schultz; Ryan Splittgerber; Jason Stephenson; Cristy Tower; R Grace Walton; Alexander Zotov
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Retraction--Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Peer Review and the Public's Health.

Authors:  Catherine D DeAngelis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Peer review: Troubled from the start.

Authors:  Alex Csiszar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children.

Authors:  A J Wakefield; S H Murch; A Anthony; J Linnell; D M Casson; M Malik; M Berelowitz; A P Dhillon; M A Thomson; P Harvey; A Valentine; S E Davies; J A Walker-Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Administrative Discretion in Scientific Funding: Evidence from a Prestigious Postdoctoral Training Program.

Authors:  Donna K Ginther; Misty L Heggeness
Journal:  Res Policy       Date:  2020-03-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.