Literature DB >> 12127284

The history of the peer-review process.

Ray Spier1.   

Abstract

The peer-review process is a turf battle with the ultimate prize of the knowledge, science or doctrine being published. On the one side, we have the writers and originators of ideas, on the other, we have the editors and critics. But it was not always so.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12127284     DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7799(02)01985-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biotechnol        ISSN: 0167-7799            Impact factor:   19.536


  41 in total

1.  Peer review: past, present, and future.

Authors:  M Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Great expectations.

Authors:  Howard A Rockman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Multilayer and multimetric quality control: the Supercourse.

Authors:  Faina Linkov; Gilbert S Omenn; Ismail Serageldin; Vinton Cerf; Mita Lovalekar; Ronald LaPorte
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Through a glass darkly: The present and the future of editorial peer review.

Authors:  Les Grivell
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Is peer review censorship?

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  On the management of funding of research in science and engineering.

Authors:  Raymond E Spier; Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Ethics of using language editing services in an era of digital communication and heavily multi-authored papers.

Authors:  George A Lozano
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 8.  Measuring academic productivity and changing definitions of scientific impact.

Authors:  Cathy C Sarli; Christopher R Carpenter
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

9.  Characteristics of Peer Review Reports: Editor-Suggested Versus Author-Suggested Reviewers.

Authors:  Jovan Shopovski; Cezary Bolek; Monika Bolek
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Peer Review Week 2020: Acknowledging reviewer contributions.

Authors:  Kalyani Kumbhare; Sujatha Raman
Journal:  J Ayurveda Integr Med       Date:  2021-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.