Literature DB >> 2406469

Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism.

D A Kronick1.   

Abstract

Although the beginnings of "peer review" are frequently associated with the Royal Society of London when it took over official responsibility for the Philosophical Transactions in 1752, antecedents of peer review practices go back to the 17th century. Despite the differences in the academic, social, intellectual, and economic environments of the 18th century and today, we can find interesting and instructive similarities in the way early editors defined and exercised their prerogatives and responsibilities. These concerns extend to ideas and practices that are closely related to what we call peer review or refereeing today.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2406469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  37 in total

1.  [Peer review in scientific journals].

Authors:  J Gérvas; M Pérez Fernández
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Self-citation in publishing.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Pietro Ruggieri; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process.

Authors:  David J Hak; Peter Giannoudis; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-01-02

4.  Reaching out for scientific legacy: how to define authorship in academic publishing.

Authors:  Sven Thatje
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-01-23

5.  Through a glass darkly: The present and the future of editorial peer review.

Authors:  Les Grivell
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Quality control of epidemiological lectures online: scientific evaluation of peer review.

Authors:  Faina Linkov; Mita Lovalekar; Ronald LaPorte
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.351

7.  Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process.

Authors:  M A G van der Heyden; T van de Ven; T Opthof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  The multiple faces of journal peer review.

Authors:  Sven Thatje
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-03

9.  Editorial: peer review and the editorial process--a look behind the curtain.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Andrew S Bzowyckyj; Andrew P Traynor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.