Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Peer review: Troubled from the start.

Literature DB >> 27111616

Peer review: Troubled from the start.

Alex Csiszar¹.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2016 PMID： 27111616 DOI： 10.1038/532306a

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN： 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962

× No keyword cloud information.

1 in total

1. History: Shut up and calculate!

Authors: David Kaiser
Journal: Nature Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 49.962

1 in total

17 in total

1. Ancient texts to PubMed: a brief history of the peer-review process.

Authors: P R Farrell; L Magida Farrell; M K Farrell
Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 2.521

Review 2. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.

Authors: Jonathan P Tennant; Jonathan M Dugan; Daniel Graziotin; Damien C Jacques; François Waldner; Daniel Mietchen; Yehia Elkhatib; Lauren B Collister; Christina K Pikas; Tom Crick; Paola Masuzzo; Anthony Caravaggi; Devin R Berg; Kyle E Niemeyer; Tony Ross-Hellauer; Sara Mannheimer; Lillian Rigling; Daniel S Katz; Bastian Greshake Tzovaras; Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza; Nazeefa Fatima; Marta Poblet; Marios Isaakidis; Dasapta Erwin Irawan; Sébastien Renaut; Christopher R Madan; Lisa Matthias; Jesper Nørgaard Kjær; Daniel Paul O'Donnell; Cameron Neylon; Sarah Kearns; Manojkumar Selvaraju; Julien Colomb
Journal: F1000Res Date: 2017-07-20

3. Shorter might not always be better: the case for longer antibiotic therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Reply of the Editor in Chief.

Authors: Giuseppe Citerio
Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-06-06 Impact factor: 41.787

Peer review: Troubled from the start.

1. History: Shut up and calculate!

1. Ancient texts to PubMed: a brief history of the peer-review process.

Review 2. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.

3. Shorter might not always be better: the case for longer antibiotic therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Reply of the Editor in Chief.

Review 4. The Road to Reproducibility in Animal Research.

5. From Gutenberg to Open Science: An Unfulfilled Odyssey.

6. Internet Dilettantes' Crowd-Based Peer Review: An Exercise in Mediocrity.

7. Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015).

8. Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?

9. Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing.

10. Using democracy to award research funding: an observational study.