| Literature DB >> 27822546 |
Mengxin Zhao1, Bo Sun2, Linwei Wu1, Qun Gao1, Feng Wang3, Chongqing Wen4, Mengmeng Wang1, Yuting Liang2, Lauren Hale5, Jizhong Zhou6, Yunfeng Yang1.
Abstract
Soil types heavily influence ecological dynamics. It remains controversial to what extent soil types shape microbial responses to land management changes, largely due to lack of in-depth comparison across various soil types. Here, we collected samples from three major zonal soil types spanning from cold temperate to subtropical climate zones. We examined bacterial and fungal community structures, as well as microbial functional genes. Different soil types had distinct microbial biomass levels and community compositions. Five years of maize cropping (growing corn or maize) changed the bacterial community composition of the Ultisol soil type and the fungal composition of the Mollisol soil type but had little effect on the microbial composition of the Inceptisol soil type. Meanwhile, 5 years of fertilization resulted in soil acidification. Microbial compositions of the Mollisol and Ultisol, but not the Inceptisol, were changed and correlated (P < 0.05) with soil pH. These results demonstrated the critical role of soil type in determining microbial responses to land management changes. We also found that soil nitrification potentials correlated with the total abundance of nitrifiers and that soil heterotrophic respiration correlated with the total abundance of carbon degradation genes, suggesting that changes in microbial community structure had altered ecosystem processes. IMPORTANCE Microbial communities are essential drivers of soil functional processes such as nitrification and heterotrophic respiration. Although there is initial evidence revealing the importance of soil type in shaping microbial communities, there has been no in-depth, comprehensive survey to robustly establish it as a major determinant of microbial community composition, functional gene structure, or ecosystem functioning. We examined bacterial and fungal community structures using Illumina sequencing, microbial functional genes using GeoChip, microbial biomass using phospholipid fatty acid analysis, as well as functional processes of soil nitrification potential and CO2 efflux. We demonstrated the critical role of soil type in determining microbial responses to land use changes at the continental level. Our findings underscore the inherent difficulty in generalizing ecosystem responses across landscapes and suggest that assessments of community feedback must take soil types into consideration. Author Video: An author video summary of this article is available.Entities:
Keywords: GeoChip; fertilization; microbial community; soil functional process; zonal soil type
Year: 2016 PMID: 27822546 PMCID: PMC5069962 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00075-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1 Boxplots of βNTI distribution in the Mollisol (A), Inceptisol (B), and Ultisol (C) soil types. Each boxplot shows the median value (thick black line), first quartile (bottom of the box), third quartile (top of the box), and range of the data that were no more than 1.5 times height of the boxes (error bars). Moderate outliers (circles) and extreme outlier (asterisk) are also shown. Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by the LSD test. Boxes with the same letter were not statistically significantly different (P > 0.05). Boxes of within groups represent pairwise comparisons between any two samples within a treatment. Boxes for Nm-N, Cm-C, and Sm-S represent pairwise comparisons between maize cropping samples (m suffix) and bare fallow samples (no suffix) for samples from sites N, C, and S. Boxes of Nf-Nm, Cf-Cm, and Sf-Sm represent pairwise comparisons between NPK fertilization samples (f suffix) and maize cropping samples (m suffix) from the three sites.
FIG 2 Abundances of nitrifiers and their relationships with nitrification potentials. (A) Distribution of nitrifier abundances. The N, C, and S abbreviations refer to sample sites, and the suffix of “m” and “f” indicate maize cropping and NPK fertilization, respectively. (B) Pearson correlation between the total abundance of nitrifiers and nitrification potential. (C) Pearson correlation between the relative abundance of Nitrospira and nitrification potential. (D) Pearson correlation between gene abundance derived from Nitrospira in GeoChip and nitrification potential. The nitrification potential shown in panels B to D is shown per kilogram of weight (dry weight [DW]). Correlation r and P were determined by Pearson correlation and TDIST tests, respectively.
Correlations between environmental variables and microbial and fungal communities
| Environmental | Correlation | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial | Fungal | |||||||||||
| N site | C site | S site | N site | C site | S site | |||||||
| pH | 0.34 | −0.16 | 0.680 | 0.40 | −0.01 | 0.481 | −0.16 | 0.662 | 0.17 | 0.232 | ||
| SOM | 0.17 | 0.155 | 0.17 | 0.246 | 0.36 | 0.058 | 0.27 | 0.083 | 0.60 | 0.078 | 0.07 | 0.352 |
| WHC | −0.18 | 0.882 | 0.13 | 0.333 | 0.20 | 0.125 | 0.23 | 0.094 | 0.74 | 0.102 | −0.05 | 0.617 |
| BD | −0.14 | 0.835 | 0.00 | 0.489 | 0.15 | 0.159 | 0.32 | 0.56 | 0.106 | −0.06 | 0.627 | |
| Sp | −0.14 | 0.807 | −0.06 | 0.598 | 0.15 | 0.188 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.130 | −0.12 | 0.679 | |
| EC | 0.03 | 0.439 | 0.24 | 0.136 | 0.76 | 0.05 | 0.382 | 0.14 | 0.234 | 0.20 | 0.161 | |
| CEC | 0.67 | −0.03 | 0.460 | 0.75 | −0.07 | 0.651 | −0.03 | 0.435 | 0.19 | 0.194 | ||
| TN | −0.21 | 0.854 | 0.11 | 0.334 | −0.36 | 0.978 | 0.29 | 0.058 | 0.34 | 0.177 | −0.19 | 0.65 |
| TP | 0.36 | −0.21 | 0.749 | 0.44 | −0.04 | 0.525 | −0.13 | 0.591 | −0.15 | 0.657 | ||
| TK | −0.11 | 0.719 | −0.09 | 0.614 | 0.24 | 0.142 | −0.15 | 0.783 | −0.01 | 0.316 | 0.10 | 0.336 |
| AP | −0.03 | 0.521 | −0.16 | 0.776 | 0.50 | 0.18 | 0.179 | −0.12 | 0.628 | −0.10 | 0.613 | |
| AK | 0.23 | 0.136 | 0.29 | 0.068 | −0.26 | 0.937 | 0.27 | 0.076 | 0.10 | 0.214 | −0.20 | 0.76 |
| NH4-N | 0.14 | 0.203 | −0.19 | 0.728 | 0.09 | 0.324 | −0.13 | 0.708 | −0.18 | 0.671 | 0.23 | 0.156 |
| NO3-N | −0.01 | 0.500 | 0.22 | 0.122 | 0.72 | −0.26 | 0.874 | 0.43 | 0.15 | 0.248 | ||
| Seed wt | 0.49 | 0.31 | 0.70 | 0.02 | 0.368 | 0.24 | 0.078 | 0.08 | 0.33 | |||
| Aboveground | 0.20 | 0.126 | 0.20 | 0.092 | 0.69 | 0.17 | 0.174 | 0.15 | 0.162 | 0.08 | 0.331 | |
The correlations between environmental variables and the bacterial or fungal community were determined by the Mantel test. Each site has bare fallow samples, maize cropping samples, and NPK fertilization samples. The N, C, and S sites have Mollisol, Inceptisol, and Ultisol soil types, respectively.
Abbreviations: SOM, soil organic matter; WHC, water holding capacity; BD, soil bulk density; Sp, soil porosity; EC, electrical conductivity; CEC, cation exchange capacity; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; TK, total potassium; AP, available phosphorus; AK, available potassium; seed wt, seed weight.
Correlations that are significant (P < 0.050) are indicated by boldface type.
FIG 3 Pearson correlations between CO2 efflux and total carbon cycling gene abundance in bare fallow soil (A), soil where maize was grown (B), and (C) NPK-fertilized soil. Correlation r and P were determined by Pearson correlation and TDIST tests, respectively.