| Literature DB >> 28239373 |
Sihang Yang1, Yuguang Zhang2, Jing Cong3, Mengmeng Wang4, Mengxin Zhao4, Hui Lu2, Changyi Xie4, Caiyun Yang5, Tong Yuan5, Diqiang Li2, Jizhong Zhou6, Baohua Gu7, Yunfeng Yang4.
Abstract
Global warming has shifted climate zones poleward or upward. However, understanding the responses and mechanism of microbial community structure and functions relevant to natural climate zone succession is challenged by the high complexity of microbial communities. Here, we examined soil microbial community in three broadleaved forests located in the Wulu Mountain (WLM, temperate climate), Funiu Mountain (FNM, at the border of temperate and subtropical climate zones), or Shennongjia Mountain (SNJ, subtropical climate). Although plant species richness decreased with latitudes, the microbial taxonomic α-diversity increased with latitudes, concomitant with increases in soil total and available nitrogen and phosphorus contents. Phylogenetic NRI (Net Relatedness Index) values increased from -0.718 in temperate zone (WLM) to 1.042 in subtropical zone (SNJ), showing a shift from over dispersion to clustering likely caused by environmental filtering such as low pH and nutrients. Similarly, taxonomy-based association networks of subtropical forest samples were larger and tighter, suggesting clustering. In contrast, functional α-diversity was similar among three forests, but functional gene networks of the FNM forest significantly (P < 0.050) differed from the others. A significant correlation (R = 0.616, P < 0.001) between taxonomic and functional β-diversity was observed only in the FNM forest, suggesting low functional redundancy at the border of climate zones. Using a strategy of space-for-time substitution, we predict that poleward climate range shift will lead to decreased microbial taxonomic α-diversities in broadleaved forest.Entities:
Keywords: GeoChip; broadleaved forests; high-throughput seuqencing; microbial community; soil biogeochemical process
Year: 2017 PMID: 28239373 PMCID: PMC5300970 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Pairwise dissimilarity test of environmental factors, 16S rRNA gene and functional gene data sets among any pairs of mountains.
| Group | MRPP | MRPP | anosim | anosim | adonis | adonis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bray. Delta | Bray. | Bray. | Bray. | Bray. | Bray. | |
| WLM vs. FNM | 0.054 | 0.001 | 0.789 | 0.001 | 0.779 | 0.001 |
| WLM vs. SNJ | 0.054 | 0.002 | 0.818 | 0.001 | 0.809 | 0.001 |
| FNM vs. SNJ | 0.039 | 0.002 | 0.775 | 0.001 | 0.643 | 0.001 |
| WLM vs. FNM | 0.529 | 0.001 | 0.798 | 0.001 | 0.397 | 0.001 |
| WLM vs. SNJ | 0.540 | 0.001 | 0.790 | 0.001 | 0.418 | 0.001 |
| FNM vs. SNJ | 0.558 | 0.001 | 0.350 | 0.002 | 0.139 | 0.001 |
| WLM vs. FNM | 0.081 | 0.001 | 0.456 | 0.001 | 0.258 | 0.001 |
| WLM vs. SNJ | 0.056 | 0.002 | 0.450 | 0.001 | 0.214 | 0.001 |
| FNM vs. SNJ | 0.083 | 0.002 | 0.031 | 0.001 | 0.197 | 0.004 |
Metrics of phylogenetic compositions of soil microbial community.
| NRI | NTI | |
|---|---|---|
| WLM | -0.718 ± 0.122 | 0.287 ± 0.218 |
| FNM | 0.519 ± 0.217 | 1.506 ± 0.427 |
| SNJ | 1.042 ± 0.106 | 2.332 ± 0.273 |
The relationships of microbial community to environmental factors revealed by partial Mantel tests.
| WLM | FNM | SNJ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTUs | Functional genes | OTUs | Functional genes | OTUs | Functional genes | ||||
| Arbor/shrub Shannon | -0.540 (0.999) | -0.120 (0.942) | 0.480 ( | 0.100 (0.678) | -0.200 (0.930) | 0.240 (0.728) | |||
| Arbor/shrub species number | -0.450 (0.999) | 0.060 (0.617) | -0.040 (0.933) | 0.060 (0.769) | 0.080 (0.696) | 0.230 (0.728) | |||
| Arbor/shrubPielous | -0.440 (0.999) | -0.170 (0.942) | 0.250 (0.294) | 0.000 (0.806) | -0.230 (0.963) | 0.140 (0.728) | |||
| Arbor/shrub/grass Shannon | -0.500 (0.999) | -0.190 (0.942) | 0.260 (0.257) | -0.130 (1.000) | -0.010 (0.696) | 0.040 (0.728) | |||
| Arbor/shrub/grass species number | -0.440 (0.999) | -0.260 (0.965) | -0.250 (1.000) | -0.140 (1.000) | 0.190 (0.542) | 0.140 (0.728) | |||
| Arbor/shrub/grass Pielous | -0.530 (0.999) | -0.110 (0.942) | 0.360 (0.197) | 0.100 (0.605) | -0.010 (0.696) | 0.080 (0.728) | |||
| Soil temperature 10 cm (°C) | -0.450 (0.999) | -0.160 (0.942) | -0.350 (1.000) | -0.270 (1.000) | -0.060 (0.698) | -0.080 (0.834) | |||
| pH | 0.620 ( | 0.200 (0.420) | 0.880 ( | 0.640 ( | 0.900 ( | 0.040 (0.728) | |||
| Water content (%) | 0.510 ( | 0.330 (0.420) | 0.610 ( | 0.500 (0.171) | 0.050 (0.696) | 0.170 (0.728) | |||
| Organic carbon (g/kg) | 0.620 ( | 0.230 (0.420) | 0.630 ( | 0.200 (0.408) | -0.000 (0.696) | -0.020 (0.728) | |||
| Total nitrogen (g/kg) | 0.740 ( | 0.060 (0.617) | 0.760 ( | 0.380 (0.140) | 0.110 (0.679) | -0.010 (0.728) | |||
| NH4+ (mg/kg) | 0.050 (0.630) | -0.200 (0.942) | -0.170 (1.000) | -0.260 (1.000) | -0.040 (0.696) | 0.180 (0.728) | |||
| NO3- (mg/kg) | 0.460 ( | 0.080 (0.617) | 0.830 ( | 0.640 ( | -0.090 (0.698) | -0.210 (0.929) | |||
| Available nitrogen (mg/kg) | 0.580 ( | 0.120 (0.617) | 0.790 ( | 0.750 ( | -0.030 (0.696) | 0.020 (0.728) | |||
| Total potassium (g/kg) | 0.030 (0.630) | -0.180 (0.942) | -0.190 (1.000) | -0.250 (1.000) | -0.050 (0.696) | -0.220 (0.929) | |||
| Total sulfur (g/kg) | 0.620 ( | 0.080 (0.617) | -0.540 (1.000) | -0.320 (1.000) | 0.340 (0.256) | 0.010 (0.728) | |||
| Total phosphorus (g/kg) | 0.700 ( | 0.070 (0.617) | -0.330 (1.000) | -0.350 (1.000) | -0.320 (0.983) | -0.020 (0.728) | |||
| Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 0.420 ( | 0.200 (0.420) | -0.060 (0.933) | -0.280 (1.000) | 0.370 (0.242) | 0.040 (0.728) | |||