| Literature DB >> 27806716 |
Jay Wagenpfeil1, Christina Schöllig2,3, Volker Mayer4, Ronny Feuer2, Bernhard Nold4, Alexander Neugebauer4, Michael Ederer4, Ralf Rothmund5, Bernhard Krämer5, Sara Brucker5, Markus Enderle4, Oliver Sawodny2, Julia Rex2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bipolar vessel sealing is an efficient electrosurgical procedure for the occlusion of blood vessels particularly during minimally invasive surgery. Reliable knowledge of the thermal spread is crucial for a safe application of bipolar vessel sealing instruments when operating close to thermo-sensitive structures, such as nerves. The evolution of the thermal spread over time and space depends on a variety of parameters, such as the biological tissue, the energy applied to the tissue, and the geometry of the vessel sealing instrument. Mathematical modeling has proven useful for the prediction of the thermal spread. It is, thus, a promising tool for the systematic analysis of the influence of geometrical changes on the thermal spread.Entities:
Keywords: Bipolar vessel sealing; Egg white model; Finite element analysis; Mathematical modeling; Thermal spread
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27806716 PMCID: PMC5093945 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0238-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Fig. 1Exemplary application of a bipolar vessel sealing instrument. Vascular occlusion during vaginal hysterectomy using the Erbe BiClamp 201 C. Image courtesy of Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
Material properties used in the simulations
| Property | Egg white | Electrode | Isolator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density | 1030 | 8000 | 1030 |
| Specific heat capacity | 3.550 | 500 | 2200 |
| Thermal conductivity | 0.55 | 15 | 0.25 |
| Electrical conductivity | 0.74–1.9 | 1.33 × 106 | 1.0 × 10−12 |
Please refer to the Appendix for a detailed derivation of the temperature dependent electrical conductivity of egg white
Fig. 2Egg white coagulation with a vessel sealing instrument. a The setup of the experiment that was used for model validation with prototype instrument A. b Corresponding FE model of the whole instrument with surrounding egg white and central cutout of the instrument
Fig. 3Simulated coagulation progress at . The columns correspond to the wedge angles of 180°, 176°, 160°, 141° and 90° respectively. The first row shows the beginning of the coagulation, when temperatures reach locally at least 57 °C. The second row shows the moment when temperatures reach locally at least 60 °C. The third row shows a representative intermediate step of the coagulation. The last row shows the final shape of the coagulated egg white. The instrument’s shape is overlayed in white. The white lines separate the outer isolator from the electrode
Fig. 4Simulated coagulation progress at . The columns correspond to the wedge angles of 180°, 176°, 160°, 141° and 90° respectively. The first row shows the beginning of the coagulation, when temperatures reach locally at least 57 °C. The second row shows an early intermediate step where already a significant amount of the egg white between the electrodes is coagulated. The third row shows the formation of new coagulation zones at the corner of the planar electrode. The last row shows the final shape of the coagulated egg white. The instrument’s shape is overlayed in white. The white lines separate the outer isolator from the electrode
Fig. 5Validation of the predicted coagulation progress for two planar electrodes. Comparison of experimental and simulation results for generator voltages of a , and b , using Instrument A. Provided are representative images of three experiments
Fig. 6Validation of the predicted coagulation progress for a planar and a wedge shaped electrode. Comparison of experimental and simulation results for generator voltages of a , and b , using Instrument B. Provided are representative images of three experiments
Material properties used in the verification simulations
| Property | Egg white | Electrode | Isolator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Density | 1030 | 8920 | 1030 |
| Specific heat capacity | 3.550 | 385 | 2200 |
| Thermal conductivity | 0.55 | 400 | 0.12 |
| Electrical conductivity | 0.74–1.9 | 5.56 × 107 | 1.0 × 10−12 |