Literature DB >> 27803856

Effect of femtosecond and microkeratome flaps creation on the cornea biomechanics during laser in situ keratomileusis: one year follow-up.

Qian Sun1, Zheng-Zheng Deng2, Yue-Hua Zhou1, Jing Zhang1, Xiao-Yan Peng1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the corneal biomechanical outcomes at one year after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with the flaps created by Ziemer and Moria M2 microkeratome with 110 head and -20 blade.
METHODS: Totally 100 eyes of 50 consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study and divided into two groups for corneal flaps created by ZiemerFemto LDV and Moria M2 microkeratome with 110 head and -20 blade. Corneal biomechanical properties including cornea resistance factor (CRF) and cornea hysteresis (CH) were measured before and 1, 3, 6, 12mo after surgery by ocular response analyzer. Central cornea thickness and corneal flap thickness were measured by optical coherence tomography.
RESULTS: The ablation depth (P=0.693), residual corneal thickness (P=0.453), and postoperative corneal curvature (P=0.264) were not significant different between Ziemer group and Moria 110-20 group after surgery. The residual stromal bed thickness, corneal flap thickness, CH and CRF at 12mo after surgery were significant different between Ziemer group and Moria 110-20 group (P<0.01);Ziemer group gained better corneal biomechanical results. The CRF and CH increased gradually from 1 to 12mo after surgery in Ziemer group, increased from 1 to 6mo but decreased from 6 to 12mo in Moria 110-20 group. Both CRF and CH at one year after surgery increased with the increasing of residual cornea thickness; pre-LASIK CRF, CRF also increased with residual stromal bed thickness, while CH decreased with the increasing of pre-LASIK intraocular pressure and cornea flap thickness (P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: In one year follow-up, femtosecond laser can provide better cornea flaps with stable cornea biomechanics than mechanical microkeratome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; femtosecond; keratomileusis; microkeratome

Year:  2016        PMID: 27803856      PMCID: PMC5075654          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2016.10.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  27 in total

1.  Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Dolores Ortiz; David Piñero; Mohamed H Shabayek; Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-Bowman's keratomileusis?

Authors:  Daniel G Dawson; Hans E Grossniklaus; Bernard E McCarey; Henry F Edelhauser
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Long-term outcome of central toxic keratopathy after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Waldir Neira; Juha M Holopainen; Timo M T Tervo
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Preoperative topographic characteristics of eyes that developed postoperative LASIK keratectasia.

Authors:  Jens Bühren; Thomas Schäffeler; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Cellular effects after laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation with femtosecond lasers: a review.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 6.  Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments.

Authors:  Cynthia J Roberts; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Robert Montés-Micó; Antonio Rodríguez-Galietero; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Higher-order aberrations of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces in patients with keratectasia after LASIK.

Authors:  Naoyuki Maeda; Tomoya Nakagawa; Ryo Kosaki; Shizuka Koh; Makoto Saika; Takashi Fujikado; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser.

Authors:  D Rex Hamilton; R Duncan Johnson; Nancy Lee; Nirit Bourla
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Corneal ectasia after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: a long-term study.

Authors:  Leopoldo Spadea; Emilia Cantera; Magdalena Cortes; Nicole Evangelista Conocchia; Charles Wm Stewart
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Femtosecond LASIK for the correction of low and high myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Rafael Cañones-Zafra; Andreas Katsanos; Montserrat Garcia-Gonzalez; Juan Gros-Otero; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of changes in refractive error and corneal curvature following small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis surgery.

Authors:  Ya L Zhang; Li J Cao; Hong W Chen; Xiang H Xu; Zhao N Li; Lei Liu
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.