Rafael Cañones-Zafra1,2, Andreas Katsanos3, Montserrat Garcia-Gonzalez4,5,6, Juan Gros-Otero6,7, Miguel A Teus4,5. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Príncipe de Asturias University Hospital, University of Alcalá, Av. Víctimas del Terrorismo N5, Pl 8, 1ºA, 28805, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. rafael.canones@gmail.com. 2. Clínica Novovisión, Madrid, Spain. rafael.canones@gmail.com. 3. Ophthalmology Department, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Príncipe de Asturias University Hospital, University of Alcalá, Av. Víctimas del Terrorismo N5, Pl 8, 1ºA, 28805, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. 5. Clínica Novovisión, Madrid, Spain. 6. Clínica Rementería, Madrid, Spain. 7. San Pablo CEU University, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Higher preoperative myopic astigmatism is associated with a higher probability of retreatment due to patient dissatisfaction as a result of residual cylindrical error. Nonetheless, retreatment is safe and the final clinical results are comparable to those of patients with lower preoperative astigmatism who were satisfied with the primary treatment. Our purpose is to compare the efficacy and safety of femtosecond LASIK (FS-LASIK) for the refractive correction of patients with low (< 1.5 Diopters (D) versus high (≥ 1.5 D) myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of 841 eyes of 825 eligible patients treated with FSLASIK for the correction of simple or compound myopic astigmatism. Outcome measures included residual error, best corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (BCVA and UCVA), efficacy and safety 3 months after the primary procedure or the retreatment. RESULTS: Of 841 eyes in total, 432 (51.37%) had < 1.5 D (Group 1) and 409 (48.63%) had ≥ 1.5 D (Group 2) preoperative myopic astigmatism. The efficacy index of primary treatment was 0.94 ± 0.18 in Group 1 and 0.89 ± 0.22 in Group 2 (P = 0.001). Of 138 eyes (16.41%) that were retreated due to dis-satisfaction related to residual refractive error, 28 belonged to Group 1 (6.5%) and 110 (26.9%) to Group 2 (P < 0.001). Following retreatment, small but statistically significant differences in the residual mean postoperative cylinder (-0.08 ± 0.24 vs -0.27 ± 0.46 D, P = 0.001) and UCVA (1.11 vs 0.96, P = 0.0001) were detected for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the safety and efficacy indices. CONCLUSION: Following FS-LASIK, eyes with myopic astigmatism ≥ 1.5 D have approximately four times more chances of undergoing retreatment due to dis-satisfaction caused by residual refractive error compared to eyes with myopic astigmatism < 1.5 D. However, the clinical results after retreatment are highly satisfactory and comparable in both groups.
INTRODUCTION: Higher preoperative myopic astigmatism is associated with a higher probability of retreatment due to patient dissatisfaction as a result of residual cylindrical error. Nonetheless, retreatment is safe and the final clinical results are comparable to those of patients with lower preoperative astigmatism who were satisfied with the primary treatment. Our purpose is to compare the efficacy and safety of femtosecond LASIK (FS-LASIK) for the refractive correction of patients with low (< 1.5 Diopters (D) versus high (≥ 1.5 D) myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of 841 eyes of 825 eligible patients treated with FSLASIK for the correction of simple or compound myopic astigmatism. Outcome measures included residual error, best corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (BCVA and UCVA), efficacy and safety 3 months after the primary procedure or the retreatment. RESULTS: Of 841 eyes in total, 432 (51.37%) had < 1.5 D (Group 1) and 409 (48.63%) had ≥ 1.5 D (Group 2) preoperative myopic astigmatism. The efficacy index of primary treatment was 0.94 ± 0.18 in Group 1 and 0.89 ± 0.22 in Group 2 (P = 0.001). Of 138 eyes (16.41%) that were retreated due to dis-satisfaction related to residual refractive error, 28 belonged to Group 1 (6.5%) and 110 (26.9%) to Group 2 (P < 0.001). Following retreatment, small but statistically significant differences in the residual mean postoperative cylinder (-0.08 ± 0.24 vs -0.27 ± 0.46 D, P = 0.001) and UCVA (1.11 vs 0.96, P = 0.0001) were detected for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the safety and efficacy indices. CONCLUSION: Following FS-LASIK, eyes with myopic astigmatism ≥ 1.5 D have approximately four times more chances of undergoing retreatment due to dis-satisfaction caused by residual refractive error compared to eyes with myopic astigmatism < 1.5 D. However, the clinical results after retreatment are highly satisfactory and comparable in both groups.