Literature DB >> 22157568

Cellular effects after laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation with femtosecond lasers: a review.

Marcony R Santhiago1, Steven E Wilson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide an overview of the cellular effects of femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation.
METHODS: Literature review.
RESULTS: The IntraLase is the only femtosecond laser with sufficient histopathological and confocal studies to allow review of the cellular effects of laser application. Histopathological analyses have demonstrated that the energy per pulse and total energy delivered play important roles in the inflammatory reaction to the surgery. The IntraLase laser triggers cellular necrosis (death accompanied by the release of lysosomal enzymes and other components from membrane-bound intracellular compartments) in the corneal stroma surrounding the lamellar cut rather than apoptosis (gentler form of cell death in which most intracellular components remain confined to membrane-bound apoptotic bodies) that is predominant with the microkeratome. Necrosis is a more inflammatory form of cell death that attracts more inflammatory cells. This is likely why earlier femtosecond lasers, such as the 15-kHz IntraLase laser, which requires higher total energy delivery to cut a flap, are associated with more corneal inflammation and diffuse lamellar keratitis. The design of the 60-kHz IntraLase model allows for much lower energy delivery to cut the flap and, therefore, a substantial reduction in keratocyte necrosis to the point that the overall inflammatory response is not significantly different from the microkeratome. Histopathological analysis performed with the Femtec femtosecond laser noted little change in the corneal stromal structure. Confocal microcopy studies performed with the IntraLase laser showed keratocyte "activation" in the stroma and greater fibrotic scarring at the interface than that induced by a mechanical microkeratome.
CONCLUSIONS: The morphologic alterations in the corneal stroma produced by currently available models of the IntraLase laser are comparable to those produced by mechanical microkeratomes. Advances that have resulted in a reduction in the total amount of energy delivered by the laser when it cuts the flap have resulted in a decrease in the inflammatory response associated with femtosecond flap formation to the point that it is indistinguishable from the microkeratome at the cellular level. Further study of each of the femtosecond laser models, including the 150-kHz IntraLase laser, is needed to fully characterize the corneal response to these lasers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22157568     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182068c42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Abhijit Sinha Roy; William J Dupps; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Comparison of keratocyte density after femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome from 3 months up to 5 years after LASIK.

Authors:  Pilar Cañadas; Laura de Benito-Llopis; José Luis Hernández-Verdejo; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Opaque bubble layer incidence in Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: comparison among different flap design parameters.

Authors:  Leonardo Mastropasqua; Roberta Calienno; Manuela Lanzini; Niccolò Salgari; Sergio De Vecchi; Rodolfo Mastropasqua; Mario Nubile
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Changes in Keratocyte Density and Visual Function Five Years After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome.

Authors:  Jay W McLaren; William M Bourne; Leo J Maguire; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Effect of femtosecond and microkeratome flaps creation on the cornea biomechanics during laser in situ keratomileusis: one year follow-up.

Authors:  Qian Sun; Zheng-Zheng Deng; Yue-Hua Zhou; Jing Zhang; Xiao-Yan Peng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Changes in custom biomechanical variables after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Steven E Wilson; Katie M Hallahan; David Smadja; Michelle Lin; Renato Ambrosio; Vivek Singh; Abhjit Sinha Roy; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 7.  Cellular and extracellular matrix modulation of corneal stromal opacity.

Authors:  Andre A M Torricelli; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Refractive and Aberration Outcomes after Customized Photorefractive Keratectomy in Comparison with Customized Femtosecond Laser.

Authors:  Valleh Sajjadi; Mohammad Ghoreishi; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2015

Review 9.  The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Antonis Aristeidou; Elise V Taniguchi; Michael Tsatsos; Rodrigo Muller; Colm McAlinden; Roberto Pineda; Eleftherios I Paschalis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-14

10.  Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation.

Authors:  Zixian Dong; Xingtao Zhou; Jihong Wu; Zhehuan Zhang; Tao Li; Zimei Zhou; Shenghai Zhang; Gang Li
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.