Literature DB >> 17070593

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.

Robert Montés-Micó1, Antonio Rodríguez-Galietero, Jorge L Alió.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy, safety, predictability, stability, and changes in corneal higher-order aberrations (CHOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS) after a femtosecond laser for LASIK and standard LASIK for myopia.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eyes of 100 consecutive patients who underwent LASIK treatment using the VISX S2 laser system. A femtosecond laser for flap creation was used in 100 eyes (50 patients; spherical equivalent [SE], -2.85+/-1.79 diopters [D]), and a mechanical microkeratome was used in 100 eyes (50 patients; SE, -2.90+/-1.63 D).
METHODS: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, CS by means of the Functional Acuity Contrast Test, and CHOAs by means of custom software linked to topography were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy, safety, predictability, stability, CHOAs, and CS were evaluated before and after surgery at 6 months' follow-up.
RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, UCVA was 1.0 or better in 100% of the eyes. Efficacy indexes were 1.07 for the femtosecond laser for LASIK patients and 1.00 for LASIK patients. No eye lost > or =1 lines of BCVA; for the femtosecond laser for LASIK group, 24 eyes gained 1 line, and 18 eyes gained > or =2 lines; for the LASIK group, 18 eyes gained 1 line. The femtosecond laser for LASIK group showed a percentage of eyes (98%) within the 0.5-D range in SE higher than that of the LASIK group (92%). For a 3.5-mm pupil, CHOAs' root-mean-square (RMS) increased for both the femtosecond laser for LASIK (2.21-fold) and LASIK (2.81-fold) groups. For a 6-mm pupil, CHOA RMSs were increased significantly after femtosecond laser for LASIK (4.18-fold) and LASIK (5.07-fold) surgeries (P<0.01). Contrast sensitivity improved only in the femtosecond laser for LASIK group at the highest spatial frequency (18 cycles/degree; P<0.01) after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: A femtosecond laser for LASIK surgery is an effective and, in this series, safe procedure for treatment of myopia. The improvements in UCVA and CS after the femtosecond laser for LASIK are related to the differences in postoperative CHOAs found with femtosecond and microkeratome flap creation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17070593     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  24 in total

1.  Estimation of mechanical properties of a viscoelastic medium using a laser-induced microbubble interrogated by an acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  Sangpil Yoon; Salavat R Aglyamov; Andrei B Karpiouk; Seungsoo Kim; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Interface quality of different corneal lamellar-cut depths for femtosecond laser-assisted lamellar anterior keratoplasty.

Authors:  Chenxing Zhang; Matthew Bald; Maolong Tang; Yan Li; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Bridging medicine and biomedical technology: enhance translation of fundamental research to patient care.

Authors:  Adam B Raff; Theo G Seiler; Gabriela Apiou-Sbirlea
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Nicolás Kahuam-López; Alejandro Navas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Antonio Ibarra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-07

5.  Comparison of LASEK, mechanical microkeratome LASIK and Femtosecond LASIK in low and moderate myopia.

Authors:  Khalid AlArfaj; Mohamed M Hantera
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-11

6.  Comparison of corneal flap thickness using a FS200 femtosecond laser and a moria SBK microkeratome.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Shi-Sheng Zhang; Qing Yu; Jiang-Xiu Wu; Jing-Cai Lian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome.

Authors:  Ramón Calvo; Jay W McLaren; David O Hodge; William M Bourne; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Effect of femtosecond laser energy level on corneal stromal cell death and inflammation.

Authors:  Fabricio Witzel de Medeiros; Harmeet Kaur; Vandana Agrawal; Shyam S Chaurasia; Jefferey Hammel; William J Dupps; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for flap cutting in LASIK.

Authors:  Li-Kun Xia; Jie Yu; Guang-Rui Chai; Dang Wang; Yang Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  One-year outcomes of a bilateral randomised prospective clinical trial comparing PRK with mitomycin C and LASIK.

Authors:  A D Wallau; M Campos
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.