Literature DB >> 27796632

Smokeless Tobacco Decision-Making Among Rural Adolescent Males in California.

Elizabeth T Couch1, Ellen Darius2,3, Margaret M Walsh2, Benjamin W Chaffee2.   

Abstract

Smokeless tobacco (ST) use among US high school males living in rural areas exceeds national levels. Subgroups at heightened risk of ST use have been identified, but less is known regarding ST decision-making within high-risk groups. The study objective was to describe rural adolescent males' perceived ST acceptability, health risks, and social implications and how those perceptions differ between ST users and never-users. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 55 male students (32 ST ever-users) at three rural California high schools. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. Investigators collaboratively developed a codebook based on thematic content and then independently coded transcripts, reconvening frequently to achieve consensus. Coded text was systematically organized into themes following a general inductive approach. ST users and non-users shared multiple ST-related perceptions, including: that ST is a common, normative way of life in rural "country" culture among certain groups; that ST use conveys oral health risks; and that the decision to use (or not to use) is rooted in personal choice. ST users' and never-users' perceptions differed regarding the immediacy, severity, and inevitability of health risks, particularly relative to cigarette smoking. Other differences included perceived parental permissiveness and the expected social benefits of ST use, such as peer acceptance and conveying maturity. Within this population of rural male adolescents, ST users emphasized the social benefits of ST use, while acknowledging but discounting health risks. Differences and similarities in tobacco perceptions among adolescents living in similar environments may inform effective health communication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Health behaviors; Risk perceptions; Rural health; Smokeless tobacco

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27796632      PMCID: PMC5409860          DOI: 10.1007/s10900-016-0286-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  25 in total

1.  Chewing tobacco: who uses and who quits? Findings from NHANES III, 1988-1994. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III.

Authors:  Beth Howard-Pitney; Marilyn A Winkleby
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Smokeless tobacco use: harm reduction or induction approach?

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Charlotte Lemmonds; Scott L Tomar
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  Smokeless tobacco: an emerging addiction.

Authors:  Jon O Ebbert; Alan B Carr; Lowell C Dale
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 4.  Oral health risks of tobacco use and effects of cessation.

Authors:  Saman Warnakulasuriya; Thomas Dietrich; Michael M Bornstein; Elías Casals Peidró; Philip M Preshaw; Clemens Walter; Jan L Wennström; Jan Bergström
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Tobacco use and exposure in rural areas: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Mark W Vander Weg; Cassie L Cunningham; M Bryant Howren; Xueya Cai
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Patterns and correlates of spit tobacco use among high school males in rural California.

Authors:  Stuart A Gansky; James A Ellison; Catherine Kavanagh; Umo Isong; Margaret M Walsh
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.821

Review 7.  Smokeless tobacco and cancer.

Authors:  Paolo Boffetta; Stephen Hecht; Nigel Gray; Prakash Gupta; Kurt Straif
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Smokeless and other noncigarette tobacco use and pancreatic cancer: a case-control study based on direct interviews.

Authors:  Juan Alguacil; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Similar exposure to a tobacco-specific carcinogen in smokeless tobacco users and cigarette smokers.

Authors:  Stephen S Hecht; Steven G Carmella; Sharon E Murphy; William T Riley; Chap Le; Xianghua Luo; Marc Mooney; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  New and traditional smokeless tobacco: comparison of toxicant and carcinogen levels.

Authors:  Irina Stepanov; Joni Jensen; Dorothy Hatsukami; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  16 in total

1.  A qualitative study to assess perceptions, barriers, and motivators supporting smokeless tobacco cessation in the US fire service.

Authors:  Nattinee Jitnarin; Walker S C Poston; Sara A Jahnke; Christopher K Haddock; Hannah N Kelley; Herbert H Severson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Perceived Harms and Social Norms in the Use of Electronic Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Georgia Mueller-Luckey; Kelsey Levault; Wiley D Jenkins
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-04-25

Review 3.  Personalized periodontal treatment for the tobacco- and alcohol-using patient.

Authors:  Mark I Ryder; Elizabeth T Couch; Benjamin W Chaffee
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.589

Review 4.  Research on Youth and Young Adult Tobacco Use, 2013-2018, From the Food and Drug Administration-National Institutes of Health Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science.

Authors:  Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  ST product characteristics and relationships with perceptions and behaviors among rural adolescent males: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Couch; Ellen F Darius; Margaret M Walsh; Benjamin W Chaffee
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2017-12-01

6.  Predictors of Smokeless Tobacco Susceptibility, Initiation, and Progression Over Time Among Adolescents in a Rural Cohort.

Authors:  Benjamin W Chaffee; Elizabeth T Couch; Janelle Urata; Stuart A Gansky; Gwen Essex; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.164

7.  Selling tobacco: A comprehensive analysis of the U.S. tobacco advertising landscape.

Authors:  Meghan Bridgid Moran; Kathryn Heley; Karen Baldwin; Connie Xiao; Victor Lin; John P Pierce
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Tobacco product initiation is correlated with cross-product changes in tobacco harm perception and susceptibility: Longitudinal analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health youth cohort.

Authors:  Benjamin W Chaffee; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Don't throw smokeless tobacco users under the bus.

Authors:  Jesse Elias; Yogi Hendlin; Benjamin W Chaffee; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Health Care Utilization and Expenditures Attributable to Smokeless Tobacco Use Among US Adults.

Authors:  Yingning Wang; Hai-Yen Sung; James Lightwood; Benjamin W Chaffee; Tingting Yao; Wendy Max
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.