Literature DB >> 29112713

ST product characteristics and relationships with perceptions and behaviors among rural adolescent males: a qualitative study.

Elizabeth T Couch1, Ellen F Darius2, Margaret M Walsh1, Benjamin W Chaffee1.   

Abstract

Although smoking declines in the United States, the prevalence of male adolescent smokeless tobacco (ST; moist snuff and chewing tobacco) use remains unchanged. ST product characteristics, such as flavoring, packaging, and branding, could influence adolescents' ST initiation and continued use. This qualitative study examines the potential role of product characteristics in shaping ST-related perceptions and behaviors among rural adolescent males. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted at three California rural high schools. ST users were asked about their experiences and perceptions related to product characteristics. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using a general inductive approach. Participants associated flavored ST with appealing non-tobacco products, such as chewing gum and alcohol. Availability of different varieties and flavors stimulated interest and curiosity in sampling or switching between ST products. Time-limited promotional flavors and packaging also enhanced product appeal. Adolescent ST users preferred certain brands based on perceived brand features and perceived nicotine content, associating higher-strength brands as better suited for experienced ST users. Brand preferences frequently reflected perceived ST brand popularity within peer groups. Based on these observations, potential ST regulation and health education campaigns to address misconceptions about ST characteristics could influence adolescents' ST-related perceptions and reduce ST use among this vulnerable population.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29112713      PMCID: PMC5914412          DOI: 10.1093/her/cyx067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Res        ISSN: 0268-1153


  36 in total

1.  Spit (smokeless) tobacco use by high school baseball athletes in California.

Authors:  M M Walsh; J Ellison; J F Hilton; M Chesney; V L Ernster
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Smokeless tobacco use is a significant predictor of smoking when appropriately modeled.

Authors:  Scott L Tomar
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Flavored and nonflavored smokeless tobacco products: rate, pattern of use, and effects.

Authors:  Andrew J Oliver; Joni A Jensen; Rachel I Vogel; Amanda J Anderson; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  Flavored Tobacco Products in the United States: A Systematic Review Assessing Use and Attitudes.

Authors:  Shari P Feirman; Diana Lock; Joanna E Cohen; David R Holtgrave; Tianjing Li
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Temporal trends in smokeless tobacco use among US middle and high school students, 2000-2011.

Authors:  Israel T Agaku; Constantine I Vardavas; Olalekan A Ayo-Yusuf; Hillel R Alpert; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Candy flavorings in tobacco.

Authors:  Jessica E Brown; Wentai Luo; Lorne M Isabelle; James F Pankow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Adolescent and adult perceptions of traditional and novel smokeless tobacco products and packaging in rural Ohio.

Authors:  Sherry T Liu; Julianna M Nemeth; Elizabeth G Klein; Amy K Ferketich; Mei-Po Kwan; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Branding the rodeo: a case study of tobacco sports sponsorship.

Authors:  Pamela M Ling; Lawrence A Haber; Stefani Wedl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Flavored Tobacco Product Use Among US Youth Aged 12-17 Years, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Bridget K Ambrose; Hannah R Day; Brian Rostron; Kevin P Conway; Nicolette Borek; Andrew Hyland; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.

Authors:  M A Wakefield; D Germain; S J Durkin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Research on Youth and Young Adult Tobacco Use, 2013-2018, From the Food and Drug Administration-National Institutes of Health Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science.

Authors:  Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Limited-edition smokeless tobacco packaging: Behind the camouflage.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Couch; Janelle Urata; Benjamin W Chaffee
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.600

Review 3.  Pro-tobacco marketing and anti-tobacco campaigns aimed at vulnerable populations: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Tess Boley Cruz; Shyanika W Rose; Brianna A Lienemann; M Justin Byron; Helen I Meissner; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Li-Ling Huang; Dana M Carroll; Claradina Soto; Jennifer B Unger
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.600

4.  Electronic cigarette and moist snuff product characteristics independently associated with youth tobacco product perceptions.

Authors:  Benjamin W Chaffee; Elizabeth T Couch; Janelle Urata; David Cash; Miranda Werts; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.