Literature DB >> 10089608

Temporal mechanisms underlying recovery from forward masking in multielectrode-implant listeners.

M Chatterjee1.   

Abstract

This paper describes a detailed study of recovery from forward masking in six users of the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant with a range of performance in speech-recognition tests. Recovery from a 300-ms-long pulse train presented at 1000 pps was found to be fastest in the poorer performers. The shape of the recovery function was found to be most strongly influenced by masker duration, suggesting that temporal integration plays a prominent role in recovery from forward masking. The recovery functions are reasonably well described by a sum of two exponentially decaying processes. Their relative weights depend on the amount of temporal integration occurring during the masker, and show strong intersubject variability. Nonmonotonicities sometimes observed in the recovery functions may be accounted for by considering the influence of neural adaptation.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10089608     DOI: 10.1121/1.426722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-11-04

2.  Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording.

Authors:  Alana E Kirby; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jenny L Goehring; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.

Authors:  Youssef Adel; Gaston Hilkhuysen; Arnaud Noreña; Yves Cazals; Stéphane Roman; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-02-21

9.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Temporal processing in the auditory system: insights from cochlear and auditory midbrain implantees.

Authors:  Colette M McKay; Hubert H Lim; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.