Literature DB >> 27784800

Consolidation of visuomotor adaptation memory with consistent and noisy environments.

Rodrigo S Maeda1, Steven E McGee1, Daniel S Marigold2,3.   

Abstract

Our understanding of how we learn and retain motor behaviors is still limited. For instance, there is conflicting evidence as to whether the memory of a learned visuomotor perturbation consolidates; i.e., the motor memory becomes resistant to interference from learning a competing perturbation over time. Here, we sought to determine the factors that influence consolidation during visually guided walking. Subjects learned a novel mapping relationship, created by prism lenses, between the perceived location of two targets and the motor commands necessary to direct the feet to their positions. Subjects relearned this mapping 1 wk later. Different groups experienced protocols with or without a competing mapping (and with and without washout trials), presented either on the same day as initial learning or before relearning on day 2 We tested identical protocols under constant and noisy mapping structures. In the latter, we varied, on a trial-by-trial basis, the strength of prism lenses around a non-zero mean. We found that a novel visuomotor mapping is retained at least 1 wk after initial learning. We also found reduced foot-placement error with relearning in constant and noisy mapping groups, despite learning a competing mapping beforehand, and with the exception of one protocol, with and without washout trials. Exposure to noisy mappings led to similar performance on relearning compared with the equivalent constant mapping groups for most protocols. Overall, our results support the idea of motor memory consolidation during visually guided walking and suggest that constant and noisy practices are effective for motor learning. NEW & NOTEWORTHY: The adaptation of movement is essential for many daily activities. To interact with targets, this often requires learning the mapping to produce appropriate motor commands based on visual input. Here, we show that a novel visuomotor mapping is retained 1 wk after initial learning in a visually guided walking task. Furthermore, we find that this motor memory consolidates (i.e., becomes more resistant to interference from learning a competing mapping) when learning in constant and noisy mapping environments.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterograde interference; locomotion; motor learning; motor memory; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27784800      PMCID: PMC5225953          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00178.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  50 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  O Bock; S Schneider; J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Daniel B Willingham
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Laura Walk; Daniel G Woolley; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of walking in a force field for varying durations on aftereffects and on next day performance.

Authors:  Karine Fortin; Andreanne Blanchette; Bradford J McFadyen; Laurent J Bouyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Basal ganglia-dependent processes in recalling learned visual-motor adaptations.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Jerome N Sanes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Taking the next step: cortical contributions to the control of locomotion.

Authors:  Trevor Drew; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Motor task variation induces structural learning.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  6 in total

1.  Challenging balance during sensorimotor adaptation increases generalization.

Authors:  Amanda Bakkum; J Maxwell Donelan; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Aimee D Tomlinson; Rakshith Lokesh; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Priya Patel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Variance in exposed perturbations impairs retention of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Cesar Augusto Canaveral; Frédéric Danion; Félix Berrigan; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visuomotor errors drive step length and step time adaptation during 'virtual' split-belt walking: the effects of reinforcement feedback.

Authors:  Sumire Sato; Ashley Cui; Julia T Choi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Learning from the Physical Consequences of Our Actions Improves Motor Memory.

Authors:  Amanda Bakkum; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-01

6.  How aging affects visuomotor adaptation and retention in a precision walking paradigm.

Authors:  Amanda Bakkum; Shaila M Gunn; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.