Edem Tsikata1, Ramon Lee2, Eric Shieh2, Huseyin Simavli3, Christian J Que1, Rong Guo4, Ziad Khoueir1, Johannes de Boer5, Teresa C Chen1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States 3Pamukkale Üniversitesi Hastanesi, Denizli, Turkey. 4. Biostatistics, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 5. LaserLaB Amsterdam, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Department of Ophthalmology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) methods for quantifying neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucoma and to compare these methods to the traditional retinal nerve fiber layer thickness diagnostic parameter. METHODS: Neuroretinal rim parameters derived from three-dimensional (3D) volume scans were compared with the two-dimensional (2D) Spectralis retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness scans for diagnostic capability. This study analyzed one eye per patient of 104 glaucoma patients and 58 healthy subjects. The shortest distances between the cup surface and the OCT-based disc margin were automatically calculated to determine the thickness and area of the minimum distance band (MDB) neuroretinal rim parameter. Traditional 150-μm reference surface-based rim parameters (volume, area, and thickness) were also calculated. The diagnostic capabilities of these five parameters were compared with RNFL thickness using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. RESULTS: The MDB thickness had significantly higher diagnostic capability than the RNFL thickness in the nasal (0.913 vs. 0.818, P = 0.004) and temporal (0.922 vs. 0.858, P = 0.026) quadrants and the inferonasal (0.950 vs. 0.897, P = 0.011) and superonasal (0.933 vs. 0.868, P = 0.012) sectors. The MDB area and the three neuroretinal rim parameters based on the 150-μm reference surface had diagnostic capabilities similar to RNFL thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D MDB thickness had a high diagnostic capability for glaucoma and may be of significant clinical utility. It had higher diagnostic capability than the RNFL thickness in the nasal and temporal quadrants and the inferonasal and superonasal sectors.
PURPOSE: To describe spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) methods for quantifying neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucoma and to compare these methods to the traditional retinal nerve fiber layer thickness diagnostic parameter. METHODS: Neuroretinal rim parameters derived from three-dimensional (3D) volume scans were compared with the two-dimensional (2D) Spectralis retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness scans for diagnostic capability. This study analyzed one eye per patient of 104 glaucoma patients and 58 healthy subjects. The shortest distances between the cup surface and the OCT-based disc margin were automatically calculated to determine the thickness and area of the minimum distance band (MDB) neuroretinal rim parameter. Traditional 150-μm reference surface-based rim parameters (volume, area, and thickness) were also calculated. The diagnostic capabilities of these five parameters were compared with RNFL thickness using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. RESULTS: The MDB thickness had significantly higher diagnostic capability than the RNFL thickness in the nasal (0.913 vs. 0.818, P = 0.004) and temporal (0.922 vs. 0.858, P = 0.026) quadrants and the inferonasal (0.950 vs. 0.897, P = 0.011) and superonasal (0.933 vs. 0.868, P = 0.012) sectors. The MDB area and the three neuroretinal rim parameters based on the 150-μm reference surface had diagnostic capabilities similar to RNFL thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D MDB thickness had a high diagnostic capability for glaucoma and may be of significant clinical utility. It had higher diagnostic capability than the RNFL thickness in the nasal and temporal quadrants and the inferonasal and superonasal sectors.
Authors: Teresa C Chen; Barry Cense; Mark C Pierce; Nader Nassif; B Hyle Park; Seok H Yun; Brian R White; Brett E Bouma; Guillermo J Tearney; Johannes F de Boer Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2005-12
Authors: H El Chehab; M Delbarre; M Maréchal; R Rosenberg; A-F Marill; J-R Fénolland; J-P Renard Journal: J Fr Ophtalmol Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 0.818
Authors: Felipe A Medeiros; Diana Ng; Linda M Zangwill; Pamela A Sample; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Tarek Alasil; Kaidi Wang; Pearse A Keane; Hang Lee; Neda Baniasadi; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Yingna Liu; Huseyin Simavli; Christian John Que; Jennifer L Rizzo; Edem Tsikata; Rie Maurer; Teresa C Chen Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Nicholas G Strouthidis; Hongli Yang; Juan F Reynaud; Jonathan L Grimm; Stuart K Gardiner; Brad Fortune; Claude F Burgoyne Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; David Solá-Del Valle; Angela V Turalba; Iryna A Falkenstein; Michael Horsley; Julie H Kim; Brian J Song; Hana L Takusagawa; Kaidi Wang; Teresa C Chen Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-09-23 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Kenneth C Fan; Edem Tsikata; Ziad Khoueir; Huseyin Simavli; Rong Guo; Regina A de Luna; Sumir Pandit; Christian J Que; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Ali Riza Cenk Celebi; Elli A Park; Alice Chandra Verticchio Vercellin; Edem Tsikata; Ramon Lee; Eric Shieh; Hussein Antar; Madeline Freeman; Jing Zhang; Christian Que; Huseyin Simavli; Michael McClurkin; Rong Guo; Tobias Elze; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; Hussein Antar; Edem Tsikata; Rong Guo; Georgia Papadogeorgou; Madeline Freeman; Ziad Khoueir; Ramon Lee; Eric Shieh; Huseyin Simavli; Christian John Que; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Ziad Khoueir; Firas Jassim; Boy Braaf; Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; Edem Tsikata; James Chodosh; Claes H Dohlman; Benjamin J Vakoc; Brett E Bouma; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Yingna Liu; Firas Jassim; Boy Braaf; Ziad Khoueir; Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; Geulah S Ben-David; Georgia Papadogeorgou; Edem Tsikata; Huseyin Simavli; Christian Que; Ramon Lee; Eric Shieh; Benjamin J Vakoc; Brett E Bouma; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Hussein Antar; Edem Tsikata; Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul; Jing Zhang; Eric Shieh; Ramon Lee; Madeline Freeman; Georgia Papadogeorgou; Huseyin Simavli; Christian Que; Alice C Verticchio Vercellin; Ziad Khoueir; Johannes F de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Wendy W Liu; Michael McClurkin; Edem Tsikata; Pui-Chuen Hui; Tobias Elze; Ali R C Celebi; Ziad Khoueir; Ramon Lee; Eric Shieh; Huseyin Simavli; Christian Que; Rong Guo; Johannes de Boer; Teresa C Chen Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.290