Literature DB >> 32632407

A Comparison of OCT Parameters in Identifying Glaucoma Damage in Eyes Suspected of Having Glaucoma.

Brian C Stagg1, Felipe A Medeiros1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) for diagnosing glaucoma in those suspected of having the disease. Design: Observational cohort study. Participants: 113 eyes from 81 patients suspected of having glaucoma based on optic nerve appearance.
Methods: Participants were imaged using SDOCT and RNFLT and BMO-MRW were measured. All participants had normal visual fields at the time of imaging, but were considered suspects based on the appearance of the optic disc during clinical examination. Eyes were classified as glaucomatous or non-glaucomatous based on documented stereophotographic evidence of progressive glaucomatous change in the appearance of the optic nerve or retinal nerve fiber layer occurring before the imaging session. For each parameter, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the sensitivity with fixed specificities of 80% and 95%. Main Outcome Measures: Areas under the ROC curves.
Results: Of the 113 eyes suspected of having glaucoma, 52 (46.0%) eyes had progressive glaucomatous optic nerve changes and were classified as having pre-perimetric glaucoma and 61 (54.0%) eyes did not have progressive glaucomatous optic nerve changes (followed untreated for an average of 9.4±3.2 years) and were classified as normal. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95) for global RNFLT and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.85) for global BMO-MRW (p=0.006). The sensitivity at 95% specificity was 60% for the global RNFLT parameter and 40% for the global BMO-MRW parameter. The RNFLT parameters that achieved areas under ROC curve ≥0.80 were global (0.89), supero-temporal (0.80), infero-temporal (0.87), and supero-nasal (0.81). The only BMOBRW parameter that achieved area under ROC curve ≥0.80 was infero-temporal (0.82). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that RNFLT parameters may be better able to identify pre-perimetric glaucomatous damage in glaucoma suspects than BMO-MRW.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32632407      PMCID: PMC7337266          DOI: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma        ISSN: 2589-4196


  19 in total

1.  A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Pamela A Sample; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Evaluation of two-dimensional Bruch's membrane opening minimum rim area for glaucoma diagnostics in a large patient cohort.

Authors:  Philip Enders; Werner Adler; David Kiessling; Vincent Weber; Friederike Schaub; Manuel M Hermann; Thomas Dietlein; Claus Cursiefen; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Estimation and Comparison of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves.

Authors:  Margaret Pepe; Gary Longton; Holly Janes
Journal:  Stata J       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.637

4.  Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.

Authors:  Christopher Kai-shun Leung; Cong Ye; Robert N Weinreb; Carol Yim Lui Cheung; Quanliang Qiu; Shu Liu; Guihua Xu; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Gianmarco Vizzeri; Linda M Zangwill; Luciana M Alencar; Pamela A Sample; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Three-Dimensional Neuroretinal Rim Parameter for Glaucoma Using High-Density Volume Scans.

Authors:  Eric Shieh; Ramon Lee; Christian Que; Vivek Srinivasan; Rong Guo; Regina DeLuna; Sumir Pandit; Huseyin Simavli; Rajini Seevaratnam; Edem Tsikata; Johannes de Boer; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Glaucoma Diagnostic Ability of the New Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Analysis Based on Bruch's Membrane Opening.

Authors:  Eun Ji Lee; Kyoung Min Lee; Hyunjoong Kim; Tae-Woo Kim
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Glaucoma With Sector-Based and a New Total Profile-Based Analysis of Neuroretinal Rim and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness.

Authors:  Vishva M Danthurebandara; Jayme R Vianna; Glen P Sharpe; Donna M Hutchison; Anne C Belliveau; Lesya M Shuba; Marcelo T Nicolela; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Comprehensive Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Neuroretinal Rim in Glaucoma Using High-Density Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Volume Scans.

Authors:  Edem Tsikata; Ramon Lee; Eric Shieh; Huseyin Simavli; Christian J Que; Rong Guo; Ziad Khoueir; Johannes de Boer; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The new Bruch's membrane opening - minimum rim width classification improves optical coherence tomography specificity in tilted discs.

Authors:  Gema Rebolleda; Alfonso Casado; Noelia Oblanca; Francisco J Muñoz-Negrete
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinicians' Use of Quantitative Information When Assessing the Rate of Structural Progression in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Robert M Kinast; Teresa C Chen; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Jonathan S Myers; Jin Wook Jeoung; John T Lind; Lindsay A Rhodes; Donald L Budenz; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2022-02-07

2.  Development and clinical deployment of a smartphone-based visual field deep learning system for glaucoma detection.

Authors:  Fei Li; Diping Song; Han Chen; Jian Xiong; Xingyi Li; Hua Zhong; Guangxian Tang; Sujie Fan; Dennis S C Lam; Weihua Pan; Yajuan Zheng; Ying Li; Guoxiang Qu; Junjun He; Zhe Wang; Ling Jin; Rouxi Zhou; Yunhe Song; Yi Sun; Weijing Cheng; Chunman Yang; Yazhi Fan; Yingjie Li; Hengli Zhang; Ye Yuan; Yang Xu; Yunfan Xiong; Lingfei Jin; Aiguo Lv; Lingzhi Niu; Yuhong Liu; Shaoli Li; Jiani Zhang; Linda M Zangwill; Alejandro F Frangi; Tin Aung; Ching-Yu Cheng; Yu Qiao; Xiulan Zhang; Daniel S W Ting
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-09-22

3.  A Simple Subjective Evaluation of Enface OCT Reflectance Images Distinguishes Glaucoma From Healthy Eyes.

Authors:  Riccardo Cheloni; Simon D Dewsbery; Jonathan Denniss
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Pattern Electroretinogram Parameters and their Associations with Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Suspects.

Authors:  Andrew Tirsi; Amanda Wong; Daniel Zhu; Guillaume Stoffels; Peter Derr; Celso Tello Md
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2022 May-Aug
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.