| Literature DB >> 29725607 |
Jean-Claude Mwanza1, Joshua L Warren2, Donald L Budenz1.
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has moved to the forefront of imaging modalities in the management of glaucoma and retinal diseases. It is modifying how glaucoma and glaucoma progression are diagnosed clinically and augmenting our understanding of the disease. OCT provides multiple parameters from various anatomic areas for glaucoma diagnosis, evaluation of treatment efficacy, and progression monitoring. While the use of multiple parameters has increased the likelihood of detecting early structural changes, diagnosing glaucoma in early stages is often challenging when the damages are subtle and not apparent on OCT scans, in addition to the fact that assessment of OCT parameters often yields conflicting findings. One promising approach is to combine multiple individual parameters into a composite parameter from the same test to improve diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. This review presents current evidence regarding the value of spectral domain OCT composite parameters in diagnosing early glaucoma.Entities:
Keywords: Combination of parameters; Early glaucoma; Optical coherence tomography
Year: 2018 PMID: 29725607 PMCID: PMC5921308 DOI: 10.1186/s40662-018-0101-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eye Vis (Lond) ISSN: 2326-0254
Fig. 1Location of scans and parameters measured by four selected SDOCT devices. Peripapillary scan for measuring RNFL thickness (overall and sectoral) and GCIPL thickness on Cirrus HD-OCT (top let), macular retinal thickness grid on Spectralis (top right), GCC on RTVue (bottom left), and macular RNFL, GCC and GCIPL on Topcon 3D-OCT (bottom right). The same scan centered on the ONH is also used to quantify ONH parameters
Fig. 2Quantification of minimum rim width (MRW) with Spectralis OCT. OCT fundus photograph (top panel) with disc margin (red dots) as the device will place it. MRW analysis with B-scans corresponding to the 12 clock-hours where the red line represents the internal limiting membrane (LM), the green arrow represents the MRW extending from the Bruch’s membrane opening (BMO) to the ILM (middle panel). The bottom panel shows the sectors for which MRW is generated by the device (same sectors as peripapillary RNFL thickness). Image courtesy of Alexandre Reis, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
Summary of main features of models combining OCT parameters for the diagnosis of early glaucoma
| Model | Analytical Method | Proposed Combination | Predicted Probability Cutoff Points | AUC 95% CI width | Strength | Weakness | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSDI [ | Multivariable logistic regression | Average RNFL+GCC; focal loss volume RNFL+GCC; VCDR | Not provided | – | Improved diagnostic ability | Inter-variable collinearity | Internal |
| OCT Glaucoma Diagnostic Calculator [ | Multivariable logistic regression | Age, color code for SN, ST, and min GCIPL, CDR, and values of CDR, VCDR, IT GCIPL and inferior quadrant RNFL. | < 0.3 = low; | 0.046 | Improved diagnostic ability | Inter-variable collinearity | Internal |
| UNC OCT Index [ | Exploratory Factor Analysis; multivariable logistic regression | Composite RNFL (average, superior and inferior quadrants), composite ONH (VCDR, CDR, rim area), composite GCIPL (all 8 parameters), age | ≤0.34 = low; > 0.34 = high | 0.011 | Minimized inter-variable collinearity, improved diagnostics ability | Some information in the original set of variables may be lost when running the factor analysis | Internal, external |
| Baskaran et al. [ | Classification And Regression Tree | RNFL (superior, inferior and nasal quadrant, symmetry); ONH (disc area, VCDR, cup volume) | Not provided | 0.01 | Low misclassification rate; improved diagnostic ability | Inter-variable collinearity | Internal |
| Baskaran et al. [ | Linear Discriminant Analysis | RNFL (average, IQ, SQ); ONH (VCDR, CDR, disc and rim area) | Not provided | 0.02 | Low misclassification rate; improved diagnostic ability | Inter-variable collinearity | Internal |
| Blumberg et al. [ | Logistic regression | Disc area; RNFL (superior quadrant, clock-hours 8, 12, 1, 6); age | Not provided | 0.247 | Improved diagnostic ability | Wide AUC 95% CI | Internal |
| Fang et al. [ | Logistic regression | Average RNFL, VCDR, rim area | Not provided | 0.109 | – | Variables chosen arbitrary. Wide AUC 95% CI. Inter-variable collinearity. | No |
| Huang et al. [ | Linear Discriminant Analysis | RNFL (ST1 and 2, NU2, IT1), disc area, standard deviation of superior and inferior hemispheric GCC | ≤0.131 | 0.045 | Improved diagnostic ability | Inter-variable collinearity | No |
| Yoshida et al. [ | Random Forest classification | ONH, RNFL, and GCIPL | Not provided | 0.028 | Improved diagnostic ability | Risk of overfitting | Internal |
AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence intervals; GSDI = Glaucoma Structural Diagnostic Index; RNFL = retinal nerve fiber layer; GCC = ganglion cell complex; VCDR = vertical cup-to-disc ratio; GCIPL = ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer; CDR = cup-to-disc ratio; UNC = University of North Carolina
Fig. 3Diagram illustrating the steps of the UNC OCT Index algorithm including the OCT parameters used, the modeling analytical methods (exploratory factor analysis with promax rotation, logistic regression with backward elimination technique the final formula for deriving the predicted probability and internal validation) and final multivariable model for deriving the predicted probability
Fig. 4Cirrus OCT report of a 70-year old patient suspected of having glaucoma in both eyes. Visual fields are normal (MD: 0.56 dB in OD and − 0.89 dB in OS). In OD the average, superior quadrant and clock-hours 11 and 7 RNFL and inferotemporal GCIPL thicknesses are borderline, ONH topographic measurements are within normal range. In OS, all measurements are within normal range except RNFL thickness in clock-hours 1 and 5 and GCIPL thickness in the superotemporal sector that are borderline. Application of the UNC OCT Index algorithm yielded predicted probabilities of 0.765 (0.339–0.954) for OD and 0.087 (0.014–0.382) for OS, suggesting high likelihood of glaucoma in OD and low such likelihood in OS