| Literature DB >> 27761750 |
Hirofumi Ohtani1, Shigeki Kimura2, Tomoyo Sugiyama1, Keiichi Hishikari1, Toru Misawa1, Masafumi Mizusawa1, Kazuto Hayasaka1, Yosuke Yamakami1, Keisuke Kojima1, Yuichiro Sagawa1, Hiroyuki Hikita1, Takashi Ashikaga3, Atsushi Takahashi1, Mitsuaki Isobe3.
Abstract
Few studies have directly compared vascular responses to second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). We performed optical coherence tomography examinations in 56 consecutive patients with implanted single stent [19 cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 22 platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), and 15 resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES)] for de novo lesions, and who did not have restenosis at their 9-month follow-up. Neointimal thickness (NIT), stent apposition, and neointimal coverage were assessed in every strut. A neointimal unevenness score [(NUS), maximum NIT/average NIT in the same cross-section] was determined for every 1-mm cross-section (CS). A total of 8350 struts and 1159 CSs were analyzed. The CoCr- and PtCr-EES had significantly fewer malapposed struts compared to the R-ZES (CoCr-EES: 0.19 % vs. PtCr-EES: 0.19 % vs. R-ZES: 0.61 %, p = 0.007). Furthermore, the PtCr-EES had a lower frequency of uncovered struts compared to the others (CoCr-EES: 2.0 % vs. PtCr-EES: 1.4 % vs. R-ZES: 2.3 %, p = 0.047). The NUS correlated with the frequency of uncovered struts (p < 0.001, r = 0.54). The EESs demonstrated more homogenous neointimal growth, as shown in the NUS, compared to the R-ZES [CoCr-EES: 1.66 (1.38-1.97) vs. PtCr-EES: 1.67 (1.41-2.00) vs. R-ZES: 1.94 (1.56-2.28), p < 0.001]. Our results demonstrate that unevenness neointimal growth may relate with strut coverage after second-generation DES implantation. The PtCr-EES had a high frequency of strut coverage with a homogeneous neointima, suggesting fewer risks for stent thrombosis.Entities:
Keywords: Neointimal hyperplasia; Optical coherence tomography; Second-generation drug-eluting stent; Strut coverage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27761750 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-1001-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357