Literature DB >> 21470815

A prospective, randomized evaluation of a novel everolimus-eluting coronary stent: the PLATINUM (a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial to Assess an Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System [PROMUS Element] for the Treatment of Up to Two de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions) trial.

Gregg W Stone1, Paul S Teirstein, Ian T Meredith, Bruno Farah, Christophe L Dubois, Robert L Feldman, Joseph Dens, Nobuhisa Hagiwara, Dominic J Allocco, Keith D Dawkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes with a novel platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stent (PtCr-EES) compared with a predicate cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have demonstrated an excellent safety and efficacy profile for the CoCr-EES. The PtCr-EES uses the identical antiproliferative agent and polymer but with a novel platinum chromium scaffold designed for enhanced deliverability, vessel conformability, side-branch access, radiopacity, radial strength, and fracture resistance.
METHODS: A total of 1,530 patients undergoing PCI of 1 or 2 de novo native lesions were randomized at 132 worldwide sites to CoCr-EES (n = 762) or PtCr-EES (n = 768). The primary endpoint was the 12-month rate of target lesion failure (TLF), the composite of target vessel-related cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in the per-protocol population (patients who received ≥1 assigned study stent), powered for noninferiority.
RESULTS: The 12-month rate of TLF in the per-protocol population occurred in 2.9% versus 3.4% of patients assigned to CoCr-EES versus PtCr-EES, respectively (difference: 0.5%, 95% confidence interval: -1.3% to 2.3%, p(noninferiority) = 0.001, p(superiority) = 0.60). By intention-to-treat, there were no significant differences between CoCr-EES and PtCr-EES in the 12-month rates of TLF (3.2% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.72), cardiac death or MI (2.5% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.56), TLR (1.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.96), or Academic Research Consortium definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00).
CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale, prospective, single-blind randomized trial, a novel PtCr-EES was noninferior to the predicate CoCr-EES for TLF, with nonsignificant differences in measures of safety and efficacy through 12-month follow-up after PCI.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21470815     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  40 in total

Review 1.  Restenosis after PCI. Part 2: prevention and therapy.

Authors:  J Wouter Jukema; Tarek A N Ahmed; Jeffrey J W Verschuren; Paul H A Quax
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Incidence and predictors of target lesion failure in patients undergoing contemporary DES implantation-Individual patient data pooled analysis from 6 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Maayan Konigstein; Mahesh V Madhavan; Ori Ben-Yehuda; Hussein M Rahim; Iva Srdanovic; Fotis Gkargkoulas; Ghazaleh Mehdipoor; Evan Shlofmitz; Akiko Maehara; Björn Redfors; Ankita K Gore; Thomas McAndrew; Gregg W Stone; Ziad A Ali
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Are we aware of stent fracture?

Authors:  R D Acar; M Bulut; M Akcakoyun
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Hotline update of clinical trials and registries presented at the American College of Cardiology Congress 2011.

Authors:  K Walenta; J M Sinning; N Werner; M Böhm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Drug-eluting stents: the past, present, and future.

Authors:  Gregory Katz; Bhisham Harchandani; Binita Shah
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Comparison of vascular responses after different types of second-generation drug-eluting stents implantation detected by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ohtani; Shigeki Kimura; Tomoyo Sugiyama; Keiichi Hishikari; Toru Misawa; Masafumi Mizusawa; Kazuto Hayasaka; Yosuke Yamakami; Keisuke Kojima; Yuichiro Sagawa; Hiroyuki Hikita; Takashi Ashikaga; Atsushi Takahashi; Mitsuaki Isobe
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Investigating the feasibility of using a grit blasting process to coat nitinol stents with hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  F Keady; B P Murphy
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  A Quality by Design Approach to Developing and Manufacturing Polymeric Nanoparticle Drug Products.

Authors:  Greg Troiano; Jim Nolan; Donald Parsons; Christina Van Geen Hoven; Stephen Zale
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Platinum Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Results From the PLATINUM Trial.

Authors:  Christopher R Kelly; Paul S Teirstein; Ian T Meredith; Bruno Farah; Christophe L Dubois; Robert L Feldman; Joseph Dens; Nobuhisa Hagiwara; Abram Rabinowitz; Didier Carrié; Vincent Pompili; Alain Bouchard; Shigeru Saito; Dominic J Allocco; Keith D Dawkins; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  Clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics of longitudinal stent deformation.

Authors:  A Guler; Y Guler; E Acar; S M Aung; S C Efe; A Kilicgedik; C Y Karabay; S Barutcu; M K Tigen; S Pala; A İzgi; A M Esen; C Kirma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.