| Literature DB >> 27737005 |
Ulziijargal Gurjav1,2, Alexander C Outhred1,3, Peter Jelfs2,4, Nadine McCallum1,2, Qinning Wang2, Grant A Hill-Cawthorne1,5, Ben J Marais1,3, Vitali Sintchenko1,2.
Abstract
Australia has a low tuberculosis incidence rate with most cases occurring among recent immigrants. Given suboptimal cluster resolution achieved with 24-locus mycobacterium interspersed repetitive unit (MIRU-24) genotyping, the added value of whole genome sequencing was explored. MIRU-24 profiles of all Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture-confirmed tuberculosis cases diagnosed between 2009 and 2013 in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, were examined and clusters identified. The relatedness of cases within the largest MIRU-24 clusters was assessed using whole genome sequencing and phylogenetic analyses. Of 1841 culture-confirmed TB cases, 91.9% (1692/1841) had complete demographic and genotyping data. East-African Indian (474; 28.0%) and Beijing (470; 27.8%) lineage strains predominated. The overall rate of MIRU-24 clustering was 20.1% (340/1692) and was highest among Beijing lineage strains (35.7%; 168/470). One Beijing and three East-African Indian (EAI) clonal complexes were responsible for the majority of observed clusters. Whole genome sequencing of the 4 largest clusters (30 isolates) demonstrated diverse single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within identified clusters. All sequenced EAI strains and 70% of Beijing lineage strains clustered by MIRU-24 typing demonstrated distinct SNP profiles. The superior resolution provided by whole genome sequencing demonstrated limited M. tuberculosis transmission within NSW, even within identified MIRU-24 clusters. Routine whole genome sequencing could provide valuable public health guidance in low burden settings.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27737005 PMCID: PMC5063377 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic, clinical and MIRU-24 clustering characteristics of predominant M. tuberculosis strain lineages.
| Characteristics | EAI | Beijing | Other | Total | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |||
| N = 474 | N = 470 | N = 748 | N = 1692 | |||
| <15 | 6 (1.3) | 2 (0.4) | 14 (1.9) | 22 (1.3) | 0.001 | |
| 15–29 | 101 (21.3) | 197 (41.9) | 278 (37.2) | 576 (34.0) | ||
| 30–44 | 150 (31.6) | 79 (16.8) | 185 (24.7) | 414 (24.5) | ||
| 45–59 | 113 (23.8) | 75 (16.0) | 110 (14.7) | 298 (17.6) | ||
| ≥60 | 104 (21.9) | 117 (24.9) | 161 (21.5) | 382 (22.6) | ||
| Male | 272 (57.4) | 264 (56.2) | 437 (58.4) | 973 (57.5) | 0.74 | |
| Respiratory | 291 (61.4) | 347 (73.8) | 518 (69.3) | 115 (68.3) | 0.001 | |
| Isoniazid (low and high level) | 40 (8.4) | 51 (10.9) | 46 (6.1) | 137 (8.1) | 0.001 | |
| MDR/XDR | 4 (0.8) | 19 (4.0) | 11 (1.5) | 34 (2.0) | ||
| No of clusters | 32 | 54 | 37 | 123 | ||
| No of clustered isolates (%) | 76 (16.0) | 168 (35.7) | 96 (12.7) | 340 (20.1) | ||
| Average cluster size (range) | 2 (2–5) | 3 (2–11) | 2 (2–8) | 2 (2–12) | ||
| Estimated transmission rate | 9.3 | 24.3 | 7.9 | 12.8 | ||
#EAI–East African Indian lineage strains
## Other–minority strain lineages pooled together
*MDR/XDR–multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (including a single case of extensively drug resistant tuberculosis diagnosed in 2011); MIRU-24–24-locus mycobacterium interspersed repetitive unit strain typing method
&Estimated transmission rate = [(number of clustered isolates—number of clusters)/ total number of genotyped isolates]
Fig 1Tuberculosis incidence and genotypic clustering rate in NSW, Australia.
MIRU-24–24-locus mycobacterium interspersed repetitive unit strain typing method.
Fig 2MIRU-24 minimum spanning tree of the predominant M. tuberculosis lineages identified in NSW, Australia.
MIRU-24–24-locus mycobacterium interspersed repetitive unit strain typing method; Solid box shows single large clonal complex for Beijing; Dotted box shows 3 independent clonal complexes of East African Indian strain lineage; CC1 –clonal complex 1; CC2 –clonal complex 2; CC3 –clonal complex 3; Circles indicate clusters that were subjected to whole genome sequencing.
Fig 3Whole-genome Bayesian inference distance tree of Lineage 1 East African Indian (EAI) clusters with identical MIRU-24 profiles (MIRU-24 clusters).
MIRU-24 cluster A is labeled in red, and MIRU-24 cluster B in green and were only distantly related (>100 SNP differences) on whole genome sequencing without any SNP clusters identified.
Fig 4Whole-genome Bayesian inference distance tree of Lineage 2 Beijing clusters with identical MIRU-24 profiles (MIRU-24 clusters).
MIRU-24 cluster C is labeled in green, and MIRU cluster D in red and three SNP clusters were identified. Three libraries of the two SNP clusters were determined to represent cross-contamination during diagnostic culture are marked with an asterisk. Branch support probabilities are displayed as percentages in blue. The scale bars represents 10 substitutions per genome for the corresponding distance from a node. Parameters, output and version information for mrbayes can be found in S2 File.