Literature DB >> 16148286

Domestic returns from investment in the control of tuberculosis in other countries.

Kevin Schwartzman1, Olivia Oxlade, R Graham Barr, Franque Grimard, Ivelisse Acosta, Jeannette Baez, Elizabeth Ferreira, Ricardo Elías Melgen, Willy Morose, Arturo Cruz Salgado, Vary Jacquet, Susan Maloney, Kayla Laserson, Ariel Pablos Mendez, Dick Menzies.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that investments to improve the control of tuberculosis in selected high-incidence countries would prove to be cost saving for the United States by reducing the incidence of the disease among migrants.
METHODS: Using decision analysis, we estimated tuberculosis-related morbidity, mortality, and costs among legal immigrants and refugees, undocumented migrants, and temporary visitors from Mexico after their entry into the United States. We assessed the current strategy of radiographic screening of legal immigrants plus current tuberculosis-control programs alone and with the addition of either U.S.-funded expansion of the strategy of directly observed treatment, short course (DOTS), in Mexico or tuberculin skin testing to screen legal immigrants from Mexico. We also examined tuberculosis-related outcomes among migrants from Haiti and the Dominican Republic using the same three strategies.
RESULTS: As compared with the current strategy, expanding the DOTS program in Mexico at a cost to the United States of 34.9 million dollars would result in 2591 fewer cases of tuberculosis in the United States, with 349 fewer deaths from the disease and net discounted savings of 108 million dollars over a 20-year period. Adding tuberculin skin testing to radiographic screening of legal immigrants from Mexico would result in 401 fewer cases of tuberculosis in the United States but would cost an additional 329 million dollars. Expansion of the DOTS program would remain cost saving even if the initial investment were doubled, if the United States paid for all antituberculosis drugs in Mexico, or if the decline in the incidence of tuberculosis in Mexico was less than projected. A 9.4 million dollars investment to expand the DOTS program in Haiti and the Dominican Republic would result in net U.S. savings of 20 million dollars over a 20-year period.
CONCLUSIONS: U.S.-funded efforts to expand the DOTS program in Mexico, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic could reduce tuberculosis-related morbidity and mortality among migrants to the United States, producing net cost savings for the United States. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16148286     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa043194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  48 in total

1.  Domestic impact of tuberculosis screening among new immigrants to Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Kamran Khan; M Mustafa Hirji; Jennifer Miniota; Wei Hu; Jun Wang; Michael Gardam; Sameer Rawal; Edward Ellis; Angie Chan; Maria I Creatore; Elizabeth Rea
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The long-term health and economic benefits of DOTS implementation in Ecuador.

Authors:  Olivia Oxlade; Judyth Vaca; Elizabeth Romero; Kevin Schwartzman; Brian Graham; Lucero Hernandez; Terry Tannenbaum; Dick Menzies
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb

3.  A new paradigm for quarantine and public health activities at land borders: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Stephen H Waterman; Miguel Escobedo; Todd Wilson; Paul J Edelson; Jeffrey W Bethel; Daniel B Fishbein
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Costs for tuberculosis care in Canada.

Authors:  Dick Menzies; Megan Lewis; Olivia Oxlade
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

5.  How can we best address the tuberculosis epidemic?

Authors:  Jan Hajek
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Identifying postelimination trends for the introduction and transmissibility of measles in the United States.

Authors:  Seth Blumberg; Wayne T A Enanoria; James O Lloyd-Smith; Thomas M Lietman; Travis C Porco
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Development of a Surveillance Definition for United States-Mexico Binational Cases of Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Rachel S Yelk Woodruff; Mark C Miner; Roque Miramontes
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  The impact of migration on tuberculosis in the United States.

Authors:  N A Menzies; A N Hill; T Cohen; J A Salomon
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection, Immigration Status, and Diagnostic Discordance: A Comparison of Tuberculin Skin Test and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Test Among Immigrants to the U.S.

Authors:  Fernando A Wilson; Thaddeus L Miller; Jim P Stimpson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Direct and indirect costs of tuberculosis among immigrant patients in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Sandra V Kik; Sandra P J Olthof; Jonie T N de Vries; Dick Menzies; Naomi Kincler; Joke van Loenhout-Rooyakkers; Conny Burdo; Suzanne Verver
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.