| Literature DB >> 29188195 |
Kenneth Siu-Sing Leung1, Gilman Kit-Hang Siu2, Kingsley King-Gee Tam1, Sabrina Wai-Chi To1, Rahim Rajwani2, Pak-Leung Ho1, Samson Sai-Yin Wong1, Wei W Zhao3, Oliver Chiu-Kit Ma3, Wing-Cheong Yam1.
Abstract
Background: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is posing a major threat to global TB control. In this study, we focused on two consecutive MDR-TB isolated from the same patient before and after the initiation of anti-TB treatment. To better understand the genomic characteristics of MDR-TB, Single Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) Sequencing and comparative genomic analyses was performed to identify mutations that contributed to the stepwise development of drug resistance and growth fitness in MDR-TB under in vivo challenge of anti-TB drugs. Result: Both pre-treatment and post-treatment strain demonstrated concordant phenotypic and genotypic susceptibility profiles toward rifampicin, pyrazinamide, streptomycin, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, cycloserine, ethionamide, and para-aminosalicylic acid. However, although both strains carried identical missense mutations at rpoB S531L, inhA C-15T, and embB M306V, MYCOTB Sensititre assay showed that the post-treatment strain had 16-, 8-, and 4-fold elevation in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) toward rifabutin, isoniazid, and ethambutol respectively. The results have indicated the presence of additional resistant-related mutations governing the stepwise development of MDR-TB. Further comparative genomic analyses have identified three additional polymorphisms between the clinical isolates. These include a single nucleotide deletion at nucleotide position 360 of rv0888 in pre-treatment strain, and a missense mutation at rv3303c (lpdA) V44I and a 6-bp inframe deletion at codon 67-68 in rv2071c (cobM) in the post-treatment strain. Multiple sequence alignment showed that these mutations were occurring at highly conserved regions among pathogenic mycobacteria. Using structural-based and sequence-based algorithms, we further predicted that the mutations potentially have deleterious effect on protein function.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; PacBio sequencing; comparative genomic analysis; growth rate; multidrug resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29188195 PMCID: PMC5694780 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Treatment history of the patient. The patient was initially treated with standard regimen using isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide when first diagnosed with MTB infection in February 2012. Pre-treatment strain was collected before the initiation of anti-TB treatment. In early March 2012, the use of isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide was halted due to deranged liver function. The regimen was subsequently switched to ethambutol and levofloxacin. Administration of isoniazid, rifampicin was resumed in late March. However, the treatment regimen was changed again in mid-April as the pre-treatment strain was confirmed to be MDR-TB. A combination of ethambutol, levofloxacin, prothionamide, kanamycin, and para-aminosalicylic acid was therefore administered in mid-April. Kanamycin was replaced by cycloserine in late May 2012 as phenotypic drug susceptibility test showed that the pre-treatment strain was resistant to aminoglycosides. The post-treatment strain was subsequently collected in June 2012, which is 4 months after the initiation of anti-TB treatment.
Oligonucleotide primers designed for confirmatory Sanger Sequencing at novel gene targets with differential mutations.
| Forward | 5′-ATGACTTGCTCAATGCCCTG-3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′-GGTCACGATGCCATGCTG-3′ | |
| Forward | 5′-GACGGTCTATTTCATCGGAGC-3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′-GGCGGTATGGGTGTGGAC-3′ | |
| Forward | 5′-GACGAGGTGTTGCTGGTGC-3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′-GGGTCGCCACCATCAGAC-3′ | |
| Forward | 5′-CTAGGTTATGGGCTGTGGTGAC-3′ | |
| Reverse | 5′-CTCATGCTCACTGGTGGAG-3′ |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of 12 anti-TB drugs in pre-treatment and post-treatment strain as determined by MYCOTB Sensititre Assay.
| Rifampicin | >16 | >16 |
| Isoniazid | 0.5 | 4 |
| Ethambutol | 8 | 32 |
| Streptomycin | 32 | 32 |
| Ofloxacin | 0.5 | 1 |
| Moxifloxacin | 0.25 | 0.5 |
| Amikacin | 4 | 4 |
| Kanamycin | >40 | >40 |
| Ethionamide | 20 | >40 |
| Cycloserine | 16 | 16 |
| Rifabutin | 1 | 16 |
| Para-aminosalicylic acid | <0.5 | <0.5 |
MIRU-VNTR and Spoligotyping pattern of pre-treatment and Post-treatment strains using MTB H37Rv as reference.
| H37Rv | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3′ | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | H37Rv | |
| Pre-treatment strain | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 3 | Beijing | |
| Post-treatment strain | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 3 | Beijing | |
Figure 2Growth rate of pre-treatment and post-treatment strains measured in a 14-days interval. Bacteria were incubated in 7H9 broth and OD600 was measured every 48–72 h in a 14-days interval. P-value was calculated by non-linear regression model by fitting Gompertz Function into each data set. Data were the means OD600 from triplicated biological replicates ± Standard Error of Mean. *p < 0.001.
Technical details of SMRT Sequencing in pre-treatment and post-treatment strain.
| Filtered Subread Bases (bp) | 1,373,823,260 | 1,069,071,955 |
| Subread N50 (bp) | 11,565 | 11,368 |
| Number of Contig | 2 | 1 |
| Polished Contig Total Length (bp) | 4,463,392 | 4,432,733 |
| Coverage | 307X | 241X |
| Polished contig length circular (bp) | 4,413,669 | 4,413,712 |
| GC Content (%) | 65.62 | 65.62 |
Comparison of variants identified by SMRT Sequencing and Sanger sequencing in pre-treatment and post-treatment strain.
| S531L (tCg → tTg) | S531L (tCg → tTg) | S531L (tCg → tTg) | S531L (tCg → tTg) | |
| WT | WT | WT | WT | |
| C-15T | C-15T | C-15T | C-15T | |
| M306V (Atg → Gtg) | M306V (Atg → Gtg) | M306V (Atg → Gtg) | M306V (Atg → Gtg) | |
| WT | WT | WT | WT | |
| G162D (gGt → gAt) | G162D (gGt → gAt) | G162D (gGt → gAt) | G162D (gGt → gAt) | |
| R43K (aAg → aGg) | R43K (aAg → aGg) | R43K (aAg → aGg) | R43K (aAg → aGg) | |
| WT | WT | WT | WT | |
| WT | WT | WT | WT | |
| A1401G | A1401G | A1401G | A1401G | |
| WT | WT | WT | WT | |
| WT | WT | WT | WT | |
| WT | WT | WT | WT | |
| 360delG | 360delG | WT | WT | |
| WT | WT | 199_204delGCCGAC | 199_204delGCCGAC | |
| WT | WT | 1244_1251delATTCGTCG | WT | |
| WT | WT | V44I (Gta → Ata) | V44I (Gta → Ata) | |
Figure 3In silico simulation of FAD binding site of LpdA in (A) wild type, and (B) mutated structure. The protein structure was colored in green, Flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and amino acid residue at codon 44 was shown in ball-and-stick format. Targeted amino acid residues at codon 44 were labeled in three-letter code.