| Literature DB >> 18369480 |
Maxine Caws1, Guy Thwaites, Sarah Dunstan, Thomas R Hawn, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Lan, Nguyen Thuy Thuong Thuong, Kasia Stepniewska, Mai Nguyet Thu Huyen, Nguyen Duc Bang, Tran Huu Loc, Sebastien Gagneux, Dick van Soolingen, Kristin Kremer, Marianne van der Sande, Peter Small, Phan Thi Hoang Anh, Nguyen Tran Chinh, Hoang Thi Quy, Nguyen Thi Hong Duyen, Dau Quang Tho, Nguyen T Hieu, Estee Torok, Tran Tinh Hien, Nguyen Huy Dung, Nguyen Thi Quynh Nhu, Phan Minh Duy, Nguyen van Vinh Chau, Jeremy Farrar.
Abstract
The factors that govern the development of tuberculosis disease are incompletely understood. We hypothesized that some strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) are more capable of causing disseminated disease than others and may be associated with polymorphisms in host genes responsible for the innate immune response to infection. We compared the host and bacterial genotype in 187 Vietnamese adults with tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and 237 Vietnamese adults with uncomplicated pulmonary tuberculosis. The host genotype of tuberculosis cases was also compared with the genotype of 392 cord blood controls from the same population. Isolates of M. tuberculosis were genotyped by large sequence polymorphisms. The hosts were defined by polymorphisms in genes encoding Toll-interleukin 1 receptor domain containing adaptor protein (TIRAP) and Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2). We found a significant protective association between the Euro-American lineage of M. tuberculosis and pulmonary rather than meningeal tuberculosis (Odds ratio (OR) for causing TBM 0.395, 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 0.193-0.806, P = 0.009), suggesting these strains are less capable of extra-pulmonary dissemination than others in the study population. We also found that individuals with the C allele of TLR-2 T597C allele were more likely to have tuberculosis caused by the East-Asian/Beijing genotype (OR = 1.57 [95% C.I. 1.15-2.15]) than other individuals. The study provides evidence that M. tuberculosis genotype influences clinical disease phenotype and demonstrates, for the first time, a significant interaction between host and bacterial genotypes and the development of tuberculosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18369480 PMCID: PMC2268004 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Pathog ISSN: 1553-7366 Impact factor: 6.823
Figure 1Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages defined by large sequence polymorphism (LSP) analysis.
The circles represent Region of difference (RD region) deleted in each lineage. Only East Asian, Indo-Oceanic and Euro-American lineages were identified in Vietnam.
Demographic data for cases of TBM and pulmonary tuberculosis recruited to the study.
| TBM (n = 187) | Pulmonary TB (n = 237) | |||
| male | female | Male | female | |
|
| ||||
| 15–25 | 20 | 33 | 32 | 28 |
| 26–35 | 25 | 31 | 35 | 19 |
| 36–45 | 20 | 13 | 34 | 17 |
| 46–55 | 13 | 6 | 18 | 10 |
| 56–65 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 8 |
| 65+ | 5 | 9 | 10 | 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Urban | 24 | 20 | 31 | 21 |
| Sub-urban | 8 | 5 | 14 | 9 |
| Rural (HCMC surrounds) | 4 | 13 | 8 | 17 |
| Rural south-East | 23 | 22 | 48 | 22 |
| Rural south West | 30 | 38 | 39 | 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined as the main place of residence on entry to the study. Urban addresses were those within the central districts of Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC); sub-urban addresses were those within the outer districts of HCMC; rural (HCMC surrounds) addresses were in the immediate surrounding rural districts of HCMC; the other rural addresses were defined by whether they were south east or south west of HCMC.
Spoligotype, IS6110 RFLP and MIRU typing for all M. tuberculosis isolates in the study.
| Typing technique | All isolates clustering (n = 421) | Major clusters | Median cluster size | Hunter-Gaston Discrimination index | Pulmonary isolates clustering (n = 234) | TBM isolates clustering (n = 187) | ||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Spoligotyping | 348 (82.7%) | ST1 (Beijing) (38%) | 3 | 0.842 | 0.798 | 0.826 | 179 (76.5%) | 144 (77%) |
| ST319 (18%) | ||||||||
| RFLP | 238 (56.5%) | Ha Noi genotype | 2 | 0.932 | 0.908 | 0.917 | 121 (51.7) | 94 (50.3%) |
| zero copy isolates (5%) | ||||||||
| MIRU | 243 (57.7%) | 233325173533 (6.6%) | 2 | 0.990 | 0.986 | 0.988 | 112 (47.9%) | 99 (52.9%) |
| 223325173533 (3.5%) | ||||||||
| 364225223533 (4.7%) | ||||||||
where N = the total number of strains in the sample population, s = the total number of types described and n = the total number of strains belonging to the j th type [52].
ST319, also known as the Vietnam genotype [39].
The Ha Noi genotype has a single IS6110 copy and is prevalent throughout Vietnam [53].
M. tuberculosis isolates with no IS6110 insertion elements are relatively common in South-East Asia and have been reported in several studies of Vietnamese strains [53],[54].
*: Isolates of East-Asian Genotype in the LSP typing system of Gagneux et al. [24].
†: Isolates of the Indo-Oceanic genotype in the LSP typing scheme of Gagneux et al. [24].
LSP lineages of M. tuberculosis isolates causing pulmonary and meningeal tuberculosis.
| Group | All isolates (%) | Pulmonary tuberculosis (%) | TBM (%) | χ2 | P-value | OR [95% CI] |
| East Asian (RD105 deleted) | 168 (39.9) | 87 (37.2) | 81 (43.3) | 1.631 | 0.20 | 1.29 [0.87–1.91] |
| Indo-Oceanic (RD239 deleted) | 192 (45.6) | 104 (44.4) | 88 (47.1) | 0.286 | 0.593 | 1.11 [0.76–1.63] |
| Euro-American (pks 15/1 Δ7 bp) | 43 (10.2) | 32 (13.7) | 11 (5.9) | 6.88 | 0.009 | 0.40 [0.19–0.81] |
| Undefined | 18 (4.3) | 11 (4.7) | 7 (3.7) | 0.232 | 0.629 | 0.79 [0.30–2.08] |
| Total | 421 (100) | 234 (100) | 187 (100) |
Undefined isolates failed to generate a product on repeated PCR for one of the two RD regions despite generating product for other PCRs; it is likely these isolates carried additional deletions or mutations in the primer region.
Odds ratio was calculated comparing the meningeal and pulmonary proportions for each lineage.
TLR2 T597C SNP allele and bacterial genotype frequencies: comparison with host genotype distribution in the cord blood control group.
| Group, lineage | Allele | Genotype | Genotype comparison | Allelic comparison | ||||||
| T (frequency) | C (frequency) | TT (frequency) | TC (frequency) | CC (frequency) | χ2 | P | OR (95% C.I) | χ2 | P | |
|
| 564 (0.748) | 190 (0.252) | 205 (0.544) | 154 (0.408) | 18 (0.048) | 1 | ||||
|
| 428 (0.699) | 184 (0.301) | 153 (0.500) | 122 (0.399) | 31 (0.101) | 7.412 | 0.025 | 1.28[1.01–1.62] | 4.023 | 0.045 |
|
| 206 (0.725) | 78 (0.275) | 76 (0.535) | 54 (0.380) | 12 (0.085) | 2.630 | 0.268 | 1.12 [0.83–1.53] | 0.553 | 0.457 |
|
| 44 (0.710) | 18 (0.290) | 16 (0.516) | 12 (0.387) | 3 (0.097) | 1.410 | 0.494 | 1.21 [0.69–2.15] | 0.443 | 0.505 |
|
| 271 (0.728) | 101 (0.272) | 100 (0.538) | 71 (0.382) | 15 (0.081) | 2.532 | 0.282 | 1.11 [0.84–1.47] | 0.495 | 0.481 |
|
| 157 (0.654) | 83 (0.346) | 53 (0.442) | 51 (0.425) | 16 (0.133) | 11.635 | 0.003 | 1.57 [1.15–2.15 | 8.048 | 0.004 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 187 (0.663) | 95 (0.337) | 66 (0.468) | 55 (0.390) | 20 (0.142) | 13.596 | 0.001 | 1.51 [1.12–2.03] | 7.417 | 0.006 |
|
| 114 (0.704) | 48 (0.296) | 42 (0.519) | 30 (0.370) | 9 (0.111) | 4.861 | 0.088 | 1.25 [0.86–1.82] | 1.361 | 0.243 |
|
| 73 (0.608) | 47 (0.392) | 24 (0.400) | 25 (0.417) | 11 (0.183) | 16.390 | 0.0003 | 1.91 [1.28–2.86] | 10.219 | 0.001 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 241 (0.730) | 89 (0.270) | 87 (0.527) | 67 (0.406) | 11 (0.067) | 0.828 | 0.661 | 1.10 [0.81–1.47] | 0.376 | 0.539 |
|
| 157 (0.748) | 53 (0.252) | 58 (0.552) | 41 (0.390) | 6 (0.057) | 0.223 | 0.895 | 1.00 [0.71–1.43] | 0.0001 | 0.991 |
|
| 84 (0.700) | 36 (0.300) | 29 (0.483) | 26 (0.433) | 5 (0.083) | 1.676 | 0.433 | 1.27 [0.82–1.47] | 1.244 | 0.264 |
OR was calculated comparing each group to the genotype/allele distribution in the cord blood controls.
TLR2 T597C genotype comparison between control and tuberculosis groups when the major allele (T) is dominant.
| Group, lineage | Dominant model | ||||
| TT+TC (frequency) | CC (frequency) | OR [95% C.I.] | χ2 | P | |
|
| 359 (0.952) | 18 (0.048) | 1 | ||
|
| 275 (0.899) | 31 (0.101) | 2.25 [1.23–4.10] | 7.276 |
|
|
| 130 (0.915) | 12 (0.084) | 1.84 [0.86–3.93] | 2.560 | 0.109 |
|
| 28 (0.903) | 3 (0.097) | 2.14 [0.59–7.70] | 1.410 | 0.235 |
|
| 171 (0.919) | 15 (0.081) | 1.75 [0.86–3.56] | 2.443 | 0.118 |
|
| 104 (0.867) | 16 (0.133) | 3.07 [1.51–6.23] | 10.463 |
|
|
| |||||
|
| 121 (0.858) | 20 (0.142) | 3.30[1.69–6.44] | 13.37 |
|
|
| 72 (0.153) | 9 (0.111) | 2.49 [1.08–5.77] | 14.826 |
|
|
| 49 (0.817) | 11 (0.183) | 4.48 [2.00–10.03] | 15.359 |
|
|
| |||||
|
| 154 (0.933) | 11 (0.067) | 1.43 [0.66–3.09] | 0.811 | 0.368 |
|
| 99 (0.943) | 6 (0.057) | 1.21 [0.47–3.13] | 0.153 | 0.695 |
|
| 55 (0.916) | 5 (0.083) | 1.81 [0.65–5.08] | 1.315 | 0.251 |
OR was calculated for each group relative to genotype distribution in cord blood controls.