Vinayak Singh1, Stefano Donini2, Angela Pacitto3, Claudia Sala4, Ruben C Hartkoorn4, Neeraj Dhar4, Gyorgy Keri5, David B Ascher3, Guillaume Mondésert6, Anthony Vocat4, Andréanne Lupien4, Raphael Sommer4, Hélène Vermet6, Sophie Lagrange6, Joe Buechler7, Digby F Warner1, John D McKinney4, Janos Pato5, Stewart T Cole4, Tom L Blundell3, Menico Rizzi2, Valerie Mizrahi1. 1. MRC/NHLS/UCT Molecular Mycobacteriology Research Unit & DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical TB Research, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine & Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town , Anzio Road, Observatory 7925, South Africa. 2. Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, University of Piemonte Orientale , Via Bovio 6, 28100 Novara, Italy. 3. Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge , 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom. 4. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Global Health Institute , Station 19, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. 5. Vichem Chemie , Herman Ottó út 15, Budapest, 1022 Hungary. 6. Sanofi-Aventis Research & Development , Infectious Diseases Unit, Biology Group, Campus Mérieux, 1541 avenue Marcel Mérieux, 69280 Marcy L'Etoile, France. 7. Alere (San Diego) , Summer Ridge Road, San Diego, California 92121, United States.
Abstract
VCC234718, a molecule with growth inhibitory activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), was identified by phenotypic screening of a 15344-compound library. Sequencing of a VCC234718-resistant mutant identified a Y487C substitution in the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, GuaB2, which was subsequently validated to be the primary molecular target of VCC234718 in Mtb. VCC234718 inhibits Mtb GuaB2 with a Ki of 100 nM and is uncompetitive with respect to IMP and NAD+. This compound binds at the NAD+ site, after IMP has bound, and makes direct interactions with IMP; therefore, the inhibitor is by definition uncompetitive. VCC234718 forms strong pi interactions with the Y487 residue side chain from the adjacent protomer in the tetramer, explaining the resistance-conferring mutation. In addition to sensitizing Mtb to VCC234718, depletion of GuaB2 was bactericidal in Mtb in vitro and in macrophages. When supplied at a high concentration (≥125 μM), guanine alleviated the toxicity of VCC234718 treatment or GuaB2 depletion via purine salvage. However, transcriptional silencing of guaB2 prevented Mtb from establishing an infection in mice, confirming that Mtb has limited access to guanine in this animal model. Together, these data provide compelling validation of GuaB2 as a new tuberculosis drug target.
VCC234718, a molecule with growth inhibitory activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), was identified by phenotypic screening of a 15344-compound library. Sequencing of a VCC234718-resistant mutant identified a Y487C substitution in the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, GuaB2, which was subsequently validated to be the primary molecular target of VCC234718 in Mtb. VCC234718 inhibits MtbGuaB2 with a Ki of 100 nM and is uncompetitive with respect to IMP and NAD+. This compound binds at the NAD+ site, after IMP has bound, and makes direct interactions with IMP; therefore, the inhibitor is by definition uncompetitive. VCC234718 forms strong pi interactions with the Y487 residue side chain from the adjacent protomer in the tetramer, explaining the resistance-conferring mutation. In addition to sensitizing Mtb to VCC234718, depletion of GuaB2 was bactericidal in Mtb in vitro and in macrophages. When supplied at a high concentration (≥125 μM), guanine alleviated the toxicity of VCC234718 treatment or GuaB2 depletion via purine salvage. However, transcriptional silencing of guaB2 prevented Mtb from establishing an infection in mice, confirming that Mtb has limited access to guanine in this animal model. Together, these data provide compelling validation of GuaB2 as a new tuberculosis drug target.
Entities:
Keywords:
IMPDH; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; drug target; purine nucleotide; purine salvage
Tuberculosis
(TB), an infectious disease caused by the major human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb),
ranks alongside HIV/AIDS as a leading cause of death worldwide. Approximately
9.6 million people fell ill with TB in 2014, including 1.2 million
people co-infected with HIV. In that year alone, 1.5 million people
died from this devastating disease, 400,000 of whom were HIV co-infected.[1] Although drug-sensitive (DS)-TB is curable with
a 6–9-month regimen comprising the four first-line drugs, isoniazid,
rifampicin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide, the emergence and spread
of multi- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR and XDR) strains of Mtb has greatly complicated the control of TB. In 2014,
an estimated 480,000 people worldwide developed MDR-TB and 190,000
died from this form of the disease. In addition, in 2015, cases of
XDR-TB were reported in 105 countries, and an estimated 9.7% of people
diagnosed with MDR-TB developed XDR-TB.[1] As a consequence of the inexorable rise in drug resistance over
time, reports of “totally” drug-resistant (TDR)-TB,
resistant to all first- and second-line antitubercular drugs, have
now become increasingly common.[2] Against
this background, the urgency of the need for new drugs and drug regimens
to tackle this global health crisis cannot be overstated.As
in other areas of antimicrobial drug discovery,[3] target-based approaches to the development of inhibitors
of enzymes that catalyze essential biochemical processes in Mtb have failed to yield compounds with potent and target-selective
activity against whole Mtb cells. The formidable
challenges associated with target-based approaches have made the discovery
of high-quality “hit” compounds to feed the front end
of the TB drug pipeline critically reliant upon the use of phenotypic
screening to identify small molecules that inhibit the growth and/or
survival of Mtb.[4] The
value of this empiric approach is evidenced by the fact that the clinically
approved drugs, bedaquiline (Sirturo) and delamanid (Deltyba), and
others, such as PA-824 (Pretomanid), PBTZ169, and Q203, which are
currently in clinical development, arose through phenotypic screening.[5] Critically, these drugs, drug candidates, and
screening hits have also been used to identify a number of new TB
drug targets. These include the AtpE subunit of ATP synthase (the
target of bedaquiline[6]); the decaprenylphosphoryl-β-d-ribose 2-epimerase, DprE1 (the target of PBTZ169[7] and other pharmacophores[8]); the trehalose monomycolate transporter, MmpL3 (the target of indolcarboxamides[9] and multiple other pharmacophores[10,11]); QcrB, a component of the cytochrome bc1–aa3 complex (the target of Q203[12] and other pharmacophores[13]); DnaN, the target of griselimycin;[14] and FadD32, the target of diarylcoumarins.[15] By virtue of their novel mechanisms of action, drugs that
are active against these targets have the potential to offer new therapeutic
options for the treatment of DS- as well as DR-TB.During the
course of screening a library of compounds for whole-cell activity
against Mtb, we identified a molecule, VCC234718,
with promising antitubercular activity and limited mammalian cell
toxicity. Using a combination of chemical biology, enzymology, and
structural biology, we show that the target of VCC234718 in Mtb is the inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase
(IMPDH), GuaB2, an enzyme that catalyzes the NAD+-dependent
conversion of inosine 5′-monophosphate (IMP) to xanthosine
5′-monophosphate (XMP) in the de novo purine biosynthesis pathway.
We further show that GuaB2 depletion is bactericidal in Mtb in vitro, in macrophages, and in mouse lung. Together, these data
validate GuaB2 as a new TB drug target.
Results
Identification,
Antitubercular Activity, and Pharmacological Properties of VCC234718
The compound VCC234718 (Figure ), first synthesized by J. Pato as early as 2000 as
a part of the proprietary molecular library of Vichem Chemie, and
known previously as VI-7777, was identified as a phenotypic screening
hit with whole-cell activity against MtbH37Rv, but
not against Corynebacterium glutamicum, in the screen described by Magnet et al. in 2010.[16] This compound was found to totally inhibit H37Rv growth
at 20 μM while not significantly inhibiting nonreplicating,
streptomycin-starved Mtb18b or 18b-Lux when tested
at concentrations up to 20 μM.[17,18] Initial screening
confirmed that VCC234718 had a 90% minimum inhibitory concentration
(MIC90) of 5 μM against replicating H37Rv and at
least an 8-fold selectivity index (TD50/MIC) over a panel
of human cell lines (TD50 values for Huh7, HepG2, A549,
and THP-1 were 100, 42, 100, and 62 μM, respectively). Subsequent
analysis of resynthesized VCC234718 showed that it had an MIC90 of 2 μM and displayed time- and concentration-dependent
kill of MtbH37Rv with a 99% minimum bactericidal
concentration (MBC99) of 16–32 μM over 5–7
days (Figure S1A). The intracellular activity
of VCC234718 was assessed by evaluating its ability to protect MRC-5
lung fibroblasts and activated THP-1 macrophages from the cytolytic
effects of Mtb infection.[19] VCC234718 was completely inactive in the MRC-5 fibroblast anticytolytic
assay at a concentration up to 50 μM (Figure S1B). However, this compound did display anticytolytic activity
in activated THP-1 macrophages at concentrations >1 μM (Figure S1C).
Figure 1
Chemical structure of VCC234718.
Chemical structure of VCC234718.To evaluate the ADMET profile
of VCC234718, permeability, metabolism, CYP, and ERG channel inhibition
were assessed in vitro. VCC234718 exhibited a very high permeability
value, well above the threshold value of 20 × 10–7 cm s–1, suggesting that it should be completely
absorbed in vivo in humans after oral administration, as long as it
is well solubilized in the gastrointestinal tract[20] (Table S1). This compound showed
possible drug–drug interaction issues, as CYP3A4 inhibition
was observed in human liver microsomes (IC50 ∼ 1
μM; Table S1). VCC234718 was highly
metabolized in both human and rodent liver microsomes and human liver
primary hepatocytes (Table S1), with no
contribution from CYP3A4 to its metabolism in human primary hepatocytes.
Furthermore, VCC234718 antagonist activity on humanERG channel was
moderate as measured in an automated patch clamp assay[21] (IC50 = 13.7 μM; Table S1).
Isolation and Characterization
of VCC234718-Resistant Mutants of Mtb
To
investigate the mechanism of action of VCC234718, we raised spontaneous
resistant mutants by plating Mtb cells on Middlebrook
7H10agar containing the compound at 10×MIC90, 20×MIC90, or 50×MIC90. Mutants were obtained only
from the 10×MIC plate, at a frequency of approximately 5 ×
10–6. Ten individual colonies were picked, grown
in 7H9 broth, and retested for VCC234718 susceptibility. Only three
of the mutants selected displayed stable phenotypic resistance to
the compound, suggesting that the frequency of resistance determined
from the original plating overestimated the actual frequency of heritable
resistance (Table ). Whole genome sequence analysis of the three mutants compared to
the parental wild type H37Rv strain revealed six different nonsynonymous
single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs), all of which were confirmed
by Sanger sequencing (Table S2). Of the
three mutants, SRMV2.6 showed the highest level of resistance to VCC234718
(MIC90 > 100 μM; Table ). This strain carried a nsSNP in an essential
gene, guaB2 (Rv3411c) (Figure S2), which encodes the enzyme, IMPDH,
that catalyzes the NAD+-dependent conversion of inosine
5′-monophosphate IMP to XMP in the de novo purine biosynthesis
pathway.[22−24] The mutation in the guaB2 resulted
in a Y487C mutation in the IMPDH domain of GuaB2, suggesting that
it may be causal for the resistance phenotype. SRMV2.6 also carried
a nsSNP in ppsA, which encodes a type I polyketide
synthase involved in phenolphthiocerol and phthiocerol dimycoserosate
(PDIM) biosynthesis. The other two mutants carried an identical mutation,
which introduced a stop codon in fadD26, a gene located
immediately upstream of ppsA, and part of the same
virulence gene cluster in the Mtb genome.[25,26] Because loss of PDIM biosynthetic capacity is commonly observed
during propagation of Mtb in vitro, we concluded
that the ppsA and fadD26 mutations
were unlikely to contribute significantly to the resistance phenotypes
of any of the three mutants. In support of this conclusion, VCC234718
was found to be equally active against a PDIM-deficient H37Rv strain
(H37RvJO[27]) as the PDIM-producing H37Rv
strain employed in this study (MIC90 = 2 μM). Of
the other genes in which mutations were identified, Rv0678 is notable by virtue of the fact that it encodes a transcriptional
regulator which has been implicated in acquired resistance to drugs
that include azoles, bedaquiline, and clofazimine, through up-regulation
of the multisubstrate efflux pump, MmpL5.[28−30] This suggests
that the low-level resistance to VCC234718 in SRMV2.10 was likely
attributable to drug efflux. In contrast, the association between
the VCC234718-resistant phenotypes of SRMV2.3 and SRMV2.10 and the
nsSNPs in Rv3479 and Rv3755c, respectively,
is unclear. However, as these genes were predicted to be nonessential
in vitro by Himar1-based transposon mutagenesis and Bayesian statistical
model analysis applied to deep-sequencing data for transposon insertion
libraries of Mtb,[31] they
were not pursued further.
Table 1
Susceptibility of Mtb Strains to VCC234718
strain
MIC90 (μM)
H37RvMA
2
SRMV2.3
16
SRMV2.6
>100
SRMV2.10
8
SRMV2.6 attB::guaB2
>200
SRMV2.6 attB::guaB2-guaB3
>200
H37Rv attB::guaB2
4–8
H37Rv attB::guaB2-guaB3
4–8
SRMV2.6 attB::guaB2Y487C
>200
H37Rv attB::guaB2Y487C
>100
To investigate the
association between the guaB2 genotype of SRMV2.6
and its VCC234718-resistance phenotype, we delivered either the wild
type guaB2 gene or the mutant allele (guaB2Y487C), under control of the native promoter, into H37Rv
or SRMV2.6, via an integration vector. The growth kinetics of both
strains were indistinguishable in liquid media, thus arguing against
an impact of the guaB2Y487C mutation on
the growth of Mtb in axenic culture. Integration
of wild type guaB2 in H37Rv or SRMV2.6 conferred
a 2–4-fold increase in the MIC90 of VCC234718 relative
to the parental strains (Table ). Because guaB2 is one of three guaB orthologues in Mtb and is operonic
with guaB3,[22] we also
investigated the effect of expression of the wild type guaB2-guaB3 operon, driven by the native
promoter, on susceptibility to VCC234718, but found that it conferred
a 2–4-fold increase in MIC90 similar to that of guaB2 alone. In contrast, integration of the guaB2Y487C allele in H37Rv raised the MIC90 of VCC234718
>50-fold, to a level equivalent to that of SRMV2.6, but increased
the MIC90 in SRMV2.6 only 2-fold. Taken together, these
results confirmed that the a1460g mutation in guaB2 was both necessary and sufficient for resistance of Mtb to VCC234718 and, moreover, that the resistance allele was dominant.
VCC234718 Is a Potent Inhibitor of Mtb GuaB2
To establish whether VCC234718 is an inhibitor of GuaB2, we expressed
recombinant MtbGuaB2 in Escherichia
coli for use in enzyme activity assays. Active and
stable recombinant MtbGuaB2 was routinely produced
with a maximum yield of about 1 mg of pure enzyme per liter of culture
by modifying a previously reported protocol.[24] Determination of the enzyme kinetics confirmed a hyperbolic behavior
and kinetic parameters close to those reported previously,[24] and in line with observations for other IMPDH
enzymes,[32] with IMP showing a KM value 10-fold lower than that of NAD+ (Table S3). VCC234718 was found to inhibit MtbGuaB2 with a Ki value of
100 nM and an uncompetitive mechanism of inhibition with respect to
both IMP and the NAD+ cofactor (Table S3 and Figure S3). To evaluate the impact of the Y487C mutation
on the enzymatic activity of MtbGuaB2, we produced
the recombinant variant, MtbGuaB2Y487C, and determined the inhibitory effect of VCC234718 on this enzyme.
Importantly, VCC234718 was found to be inactive against MtbGuaB2Y487C when tested at a concentration up to 100 μM.
Finally, to assess the selectivity of VCC234718 toward MtbGuaB2, its IC50 against human IMPDH was determined (Figure S4) and found to be 3.35 μM, indicating
a selectivity index of >30 for the Mtb enzyme.
Binding of VCC234718 to Mycobacterium thermoresistibile GuaB2
To investigate the structural basis of VCC23718 binding
to GuaB2, we attempted to crystallize the full-length MtbGuaB2. As our initial efforts were unsuccessful, we moved to M. thermoresistible (Mth) GuaB2 to
facilitate crystallization. Full-length Mth GuaB2
shares 85% sequence identity with MtbGuaB2 and is
100% identical in the active site (Figure S2). VCC234718 inhibited this enzyme with a Ki value of 130 nM with IMP as the substrate, which is very
similar to the Ki value observed for the Mtb enzyme (120 nM; Table S3).
Although we were able to obtain crystals of full-length Mth GuaB2 and solve the structure (A.P., D.A., and T.L.B., unpublished
data), the resolution (2.6 Å) was not sufficiently high for an
accurate analysis of the enzyme–inhibitor complex. To improve
the resolution we designed another construct of Mth GuaB2 with a GG linker replacing the two cystathionine-β-synthase
(CBS) domains. This strategy has been used previously to obtain high-resolution
structures of other bacterial IMPDHs,[33] and this will be henceforth referred to as Mth GuaB2
ΔCBS. As expected, this form of the enzyme retained full IMPDH
activity and showed the same susceptibility to VCC234718 as full-length MtbGuaB2 and Mth GuaB2 (Ki = 130 nM with IMP as the substrate).Mth GuaB2 ΔCBS crystallized in the I4 space group
with one molecule/protomer in the asymmetric unit (Table S4). The complete IMPDH tetramer of 222 symmetry can
be seen in the crystal lattice, through the symmetry operations of
the space group (Figure A). After molecular replacement, observation of a 2F0 – Fc difference map
(σ = 3.0) showed clearly visible electron density for IMP, in
addition to one molecule of VCC234718 partially occupying the NAD+ binding site (Figure B). There is no ambiguity in the interpretation of the density
for the molecule of VCC234718 in the structure at this resolution.
It could not be NAD+, as the density would look extremely
different; for example, there is no density for the phosphates of
NAD, and electron densities for the rings are in distinctly different
places. Figure C is
an overlay of the two structures clearly demonstrating differences.
Although the kinetic studies of VCC234718 revealed that this compound
is uncompetitive with respect to both IMP and NAD+, the
binding of the VCC234718 molecule closely resembles that of other
previously described uncompetitive inhibitors of MtbGuaB2.[34] The uncompetitive mode of inhibition
of VCC234718 with respect to NAD+ is difficult to rationalize
as the inhibitor and NAD+ binding sites overlap. IMPDH
enzymes have been reported to follow a steady-state ordered bi bi
mechanism where IMP binds first, followed by NAD+, and
product release proceeds in the order of NADH followed by XMP.[32] Moreover, a key feature of the catalytic mechanism
is the formation, during the redox step in which NADH is formed, of
a covalent enzyme-XMP* intermediate that has been investigated through
structural studies of the Vibrio cholerae(33) IMPDH enzyme. Because MtbGuaB2 follows the same catalytic mechanism, it could be speculated
that VCC234718 binds preferentially to the covalent MtbGuaB2-XMP* intermediate after NADH has been released, thereby explaining
the uncompetitive behavior observed toward the NAD+ cofactor.
This notion is consistent with the inhibitory mechanism elucidated
recently by pre-steady-state kinetics for Bacillus
anthracis IMPDH.[35]
Figure 2
X-ray crystal
structure of VCC234718 bound to Mth GuaB2. (A) The
GuaB2 tetramer (cyan ribbon, with a representative protomer shown
in gray) is shown bound to IMP (blue) and VCC234718 (orange). (B) 2F-F difference
map (σ = 3.0) clearly shows visible electron density for VCC234718
in the NAD+ binding site. (C) Overlay of the X-ray crystal
structures of the complexes of Mtb GuaB2 (green and
yellow) and NAD (magenta) and of Mth GuaB2 (gray
and cyan) and VCC234718 (orange) demonstrates the difference in chemical
space occupied. XMP and IMP are shown in blue. (D) Interactions were
made by VCC234718 (orange) in the X-ray crystal structure of the complex
of Mth GuaB2 (gray; and adjacent protomer in cyan)
with IMP (blue). Residue numbering is of the corresponding residues
in Mtb. Pi interactions are shown in green, amide–amide
in blue, hydrogen bonds in red, and polar interactions in orange.
PDB ID: 5J5R.
X-ray crystal
structure of VCC234718 bound to Mth GuaB2. (A) The
GuaB2 tetramer (cyan ribbon, with a representative protomer shown
in gray) is shown bound to IMP (blue) and VCC234718 (orange). (B) 2F-F difference
map (σ = 3.0) clearly shows visible electron density for VCC234718
in the NAD+ binding site. (C) Overlay of the X-ray crystal
structures of the complexes of MtbGuaB2 (green and
yellow) and NAD (magenta) and of Mth GuaB2 (gray
and cyan) and VCC234718 (orange) demonstrates the difference in chemical
space occupied. XMP and IMP are shown in blue. (D) Interactions were
made by VCC234718 (orange) in the X-ray crystal structure of the complex
of Mth GuaB2 (gray; and adjacent protomer in cyan)
with IMP (blue). Residue numbering is of the corresponding residues
in Mtb. Pi interactions are shown in green, amide–amide
in blue, hydrogen bonds in red, and polar interactions in orange.
PDB ID: 5J5R.The electron density revealed
that VCC234718 sits within the NAD binding pocket of GuaB2, with the
isoquinoline group of VCC234718 stacked on top of the hypoxanthine
group of IMP, making extensive pi interactions (Figure D). The isoquinoline group made further pi
interactions with A285 (A269 in the Mth structure),
along with weak hydrogen bonds to the side chain of T343 (T327 in
the Mth structure) and the main chain atoms of G334,
V335, and G336 (G318, V319, and G320 in the Mth structure).
An additional polar interaction between the inhibitor and IMP was
made by the oxygen of the sulfonamide group of VCC234718 to a nitrogen
group of the hypoxanthineIMP ring, with the sulfonamide making further
weak polar interactions to the main chain of G425 (G409 in the Mth structure). The cyclohexyl group of VCC234718 was orientated
to form strong pi interactions with the Y487′ (Y471′
in the Mth structure) side chain from the adjacent
molecule in the tetramer.
VCC234718 Selectively Targets GuaB2 in Mtb
To investigate whether VCC234718 retains target
selectivity for GuaB2 in whole Mtb cells, we asked
whether conditional depletion of GuaB2 would sensitize Mtb to the growth inhibitory effects of the compound.[10] To this end, we constructed anhydrotetracycline (ATc)-regulated
GuaB2 knockdown mutants in the Tet-ONM and Tet-OFF configurations,
as described previously for other genes.[36,37] The guaB2 promoter was replaced by the ATc-regulated
promoter-operator element, Pmyc1tetO,[38] via single-crossover (SCO) homologous recombination
to generate the promoter-replacement mutant, guaB2-guaB3-SCO (Figure S5). A vector carrying the
forward (TetR) or reverse tetracycline repressor (rev-TetR) was then
introduced into guaB2-guaB3-SCO to produce mutants
in the Tet-ONM and Tet-OFF configurations, respectively.
The guaB2-guaB3Tet-ONM and guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF mutants showed ATc-dependent growth in liquid culture and
on agar (Figure S6). Because both guaB2 and guaB3 appear to be essential
for growth of Mtb in vitro,[31] the suppression of Mtb growth resulting from guaB2-guaB3 silencing could be due to depletion of GuaB2
and/or GuaB3. To eliminate potentially confounding effects of concomitant guaB3 silencing, a copy of guaB3 under
control of the guaB2-guaB3 promoter was thus integrated
into the guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF strain to generate the
complemented derivative, guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3. This mutant retained an ATc-dependent
growth phenotype (Figure A), but appeared to be slightly (<2-fold) less sensitive
to ATc than the parental guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF strain
(Figure S6B).
Figure 3
ATc dose-dependent modulation
of growth of Mtb correlates with transcriptional
silencing of guaB2 and depletion of GuaB2 protein.
(A) Growth of guaB2-guaB3 Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 in 7H9 liquid medium supplemented with the
indicated concentrations of ATc. Data are from a representative experiment
performed in triplicate. (B) Transcriptional response of guaB2 (left) and guaB3 (right) to ATc treatment. Logarithmic
phase cultures of the various strains were treated with ATc, as indicated,
and the concentrations of guaB2 and guaB3 transcript relative to sigA determined by ddPCR,
as described under Methods. All of the data
generated by QuantaSoft software included the 95% confidence interval.
(C) ATc-dependent depletion of GuaB2 in guaB2-guaB3 Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 confirmed
by Western blot analysis. Strains were cultured in Middlebrook 7H9
broth and either left untreated (−) or exposed to ATc (10 ng/mL)
(+) for the indicated time. Western blotting was carried out as described
under Methods, probing with antibodies against
GuaB2 or Wag31.
ATc dose-dependent modulation
of growth of Mtb correlates with transcriptional
silencing of guaB2 and depletion of GuaB2 protein.
(A) Growth of guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 in 7H9 liquid medium supplemented with the
indicated concentrations of ATc. Data are from a representative experiment
performed in triplicate. (B) Transcriptional response of guaB2 (left) and guaB3 (right) to ATc treatment. Logarithmic
phase cultures of the various strains were treated with ATc, as indicated,
and the concentrations of guaB2 and guaB3 transcript relative to sigA determined by ddPCR,
as described under Methods. All of the data
generated by QuantaSoft software included the 95% confidence interval.
(C) ATc-dependent depletion of GuaB2 in guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 confirmed
by Western blot analysis. Strains were cultured in Middlebrook 7H9
broth and either left untreated (−) or exposed to ATc (10 ng/mL)
(+) for the indicated time. Western blotting was carried out as described
under Methods, probing with antibodies against
GuaB2 or Wag31.Gene expression analysis
by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) confirmed that under fully derepressed
conditions (i.e., in the absence of ATc) the level of guaB2 transcript in the guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 strain was ∼35% of that in H37Rv
and was further reduced to <1% of the wild type level upon exposure
to ATc (10 ng/mL, for 24 h) (Figure B). In contrast, the level of expression of guaB3 was unresponsive to ATc and remained at ∼30%
of the level of guaB3 transcript in H37Rv. This finding
contrasts with the ∼95% reduction in guaB3 transcript level observed following ATc treatment of the parental guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF strain (Figure S7) and confirms ATc-independent expression of guaB3 in the complemented strain. However, the level of guaB3 transcript in the complemented mutant was lower than expected (64%
of wild type), suggesting that guaB3 expression was
partially restored in this strain (Figure B). Western blot analysis confirmed that
transcriptional silencing of guaB2 resulted in time-dependent
depletion of GuaB2 in the guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 strain, with almost complete
disappearance of the protein observed at day 5 (Figure C). In contrast, GuaB2 levels in H37Rv were
unaffected by ATc treatment over this time course. Together, these
results thus confirmed that the ATc-dependent growth inhibition of
the guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 strain correlated with transcriptional silencing of guaB2 and depletion of the cellular level of GuaB2 protein.The effect of guaB2 silencing on the susceptibility
of Mtb to VCC234718 was then examined in a checkerboard
assay in which ATc and VCC234718 concentrations were varied in a two-dimensional
array (Figure A).
Transcriptional silencing of guaB2 resulted in hypersensitization
to VCC234718 in an ATc dose-dependent manner, with the MIC90 shifting ∼32-fold, from 2.5 to 0.07 μM, with increasing
concentration of ATc. In contrast, guaB2 silencing
had no effect on susceptibility to other antituberculars with different
mechanisms of action (isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin, ethambutol,
and levofloxacin), providing further evidence that VCC234718 targets
GuaB2 selectively in Mtb (data not shown).
Figure 4
VCC234718 hypersensitivity
and growth inhibitory effects of guaB2 silencing
can be rescued by guanine supplementation. (A) Effect of guaB2 silencing on susceptibility of Mtb to VCC234718.
(B) Guanine rescue of Mtb H37Rv from growth inhibition
by VCC234718. (C) Guanine rescue of guaB2-guaB3 Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 from growth inhibition mediated by ATc. These experiments were performed
as checkerboard assay, as described under Methods.
VCC234718hypersensitivity
and growth inhibitory effects of guaB2 silencing
can be rescued by guanine supplementation. (A) Effect of guaB2 silencing on susceptibility of Mtb to VCC234718.
(B) Guanine rescue of MtbH37Rv from growth inhibition
by VCC234718. (C) Guanine rescue of guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 from growth inhibition mediated by ATc. These experiments were performed
as checkerboard assay, as described under Methods.
Guanine Rescues Mtb from
Toxicity Caused by VCC234718 Treatment or GuaB2 Depletion
By blocking the supply of GMP and, hence, other guanine nucleotides,
inhibition of de novo biosynthesis at the IMPDH step is expected to
be growth inhibitory in Mtb. However, in addition
to the de novo pathway, Mtb also possesses a purine
salvage pathway.[39,40] We thus hypothesized that guanine
supplementation might alleviate the toxicity caused by VCC234718 treatment
or GuaB2 depletion in Mtb by enabling an alternate
route to GMP production via the action of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl
transferase, Hpt (Rv3624c; hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase).[40,41] Indeed, guanine supplementation showed clear dose-dependent alleviation
of VCC234718toxicity in Mtb, raising the MIC90 of VCC234718 from 2 to >64 μM at a guanine concentration
of 200 μM (Figure B). However, guanine was unable to rescue Mtb from
VCC234718toxicity at a drug concentration of 128 μM, suggesting
that this compound has a secondary target (or targets) in Mtb. In contrast, and as expected from what is known about
purine salvage in Mtb,[40] xanthine supplementation had no effect on VCC234718toxicity over
the same concentration range (data not shown). Likewise, neither adenine
nor guanosine supplementation was able to rescue Mtb from VCC234718toxicity (data not shown). Guanine supplementation,
alone, also rescued guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 (Figure C) and its parental strain, guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF (Figure S8), from ATctoxicity
in a dose-dependent manner. The response of both strains to guanine
supplementation was indistinguishable, with essentially complete rescue
observed at a guanine concentration ≥125 μM.
Depletion of
GuaB2 Is Bactericidal in Vitro
To assess the impact of guaB2 silencing on the viability of Mtb in vitro, the guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 mutant was cultured in axenic culture in
7H9 broth, with or without ATc, and aliquots sampled over 288 h were
plated on 7H10agar to score for colony-forming units (CFU) (Figure A). All controls
behaved as expected: under permissive conditions (i.e., in the absence
of ATc), the mutant showed growth comparable to that of the H37Rv
control. Furthermore, the ATc-dependent growth phenotype of the mutant
was stable over the entire time course, as evidenced by the complete
suppression of colony formation on agar containing ATc (Figure A). Transcriptional silencing
of guaB2 appeared to be rapidly bactericidal, with
the conditional mutant showing a 4 log10 decline in CFU
at 48 h, whereafter the CFU count dropped to below the limit of detection
(10 CFU). Interestingly, inclusion of guanine (200 μM) in the
agar media used for CFU enumeration resulted in a partial rescue of
culturability of the mutant strain when exposed to ATc in liquid culture
prior to plating. However, the guanine-dependent enhancement of culturability
was observed only up to 168 h and was no longer detected at the later
time points. Moreover, the effect was highly specific, with guanine
supplementation of the agar media having no discernible effect on
culturability (CFU) in any of the controls. The transient rescue of
culturability was indicative of the presence of a progressively declining
population of bacilli in the guaB2-silenced culture
of the conditional mutant that have impaired culturability on solid
medium, but remain poised to detect, transport, and assimilate guanine,
that is, organisms that can be defined as “non-growing but
metabolically active” (NGMA).[42]
Figure 5
Depletion
of GuaB2 is bactericidal in Mtb in vitro. (A) The
effect of guaB2 silencing on the viability of Mtb was assessed as described under Methods. The guaB2-guaB3 Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 and H37Rv strains were grown in the presence or absence
of ATc, and the effect of silencing on viability was assessed by plating
serial dilutions at the indicated times on 7H10 agar, with or without
ATc (10 ng/mL) and with or without guanine. The results represent
the mean ± SD from three biological replicates. The plating conditions
are shown in parentheses in the legend. (B) Single-cell analysis of
the effect of transcriptional silencing of guaB2 on
growth and morphology of Mtb in vitro. The guaB2-guaB3 Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 strain was grown in a microfluidic device in 7H9 medium containing
25 μg/mL kanamycin, 50 μg/mL hygromycin, and 2.5 μg/mL
gentamycin (0–74 h). The medium was supplemented with 100 ng/mL
ATc between 74 and 379 , and with 125 μM guanine between 334
and 500 h. The bacteria were imaged on the phase channel every 15
min, and representative time series snapshots of two positions in
the microfluidic device are shown. The numbers above the snapshots
denote the times at which the shots were taken. The white arrows indicate
some of the cells that lysed in the presence of ATc. The lower panel
represents a microcolony in which some of the surviving cells (indicated
with the arrowhead) regrow on guanine supplementation. The last snapshot
is a composite image of phase channel and propidium iodide staining
(in red, TRITC channel). Cells marked with an asterisk are propidium
iodide stained cells and represent cells in which the membrane integrity
has been compromised. The yellow horizontal scale bar represents 5
μm.
This experiment was performed twice, and representative images from
one experiment are shown.
Depletion
of GuaB2 is bactericidal in Mtb in vitro. (A) The
effect of guaB2 silencing on the viability of Mtb was assessed as described under Methods. The guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 and H37Rv strains were grown in the presence or absence
of ATc, and the effect of silencing on viability was assessed by plating
serial dilutions at the indicated times on 7H10agar, with or without
ATc (10 ng/mL) and with or without guanine. The results represent
the mean ± SD from three biological replicates. The plating conditions
are shown in parentheses in the legend. (B) Single-cell analysis of
the effect of transcriptional silencing of guaB2 on
growth and morphology of Mtb in vitro. The guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 strain was grown in a microfluidic device in 7H9 medium containing
25 μg/mL kanamycin, 50 μg/mL hygromycin, and 2.5 μg/mL
gentamycin (0–74 h). The medium was supplemented with 100 ng/mL
ATc between 74 and 379 , and with 125 μM guanine between 334
and 500 h. The bacteria were imaged on the phase channel every 15
min, and representative time series snapshots of two positions in
the microfluidic device are shown. The numbers above the snapshots
denote the times at which the shots were taken. The white arrows indicate
some of the cells that lysed in the presence of ATc. The lower panel
represents a microcolony in which some of the surviving cells (indicated
with the arrowhead) regrow on guanine supplementation. The last snapshot
is a composite image of phase channel and propidium iodide staining
(in red, TRITC channel). Cells marked with an asterisk are propidium
iodide stained cells and represent cells in which the membrane integrity
has been compromised. The yellow horizontal scale bar represents 5
μm.
This experiment was performed twice, and representative images from
one experiment are shown.To characterize, in greater detail, the effect of guaB2 silencing on the growth and morphology of Mtb in vitro, we carried out highly temporal time-lapse
microscopy experiments on the guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 strain. The bacteria were grown
in standard 7H9 medium (replete conditions) in a flask and seeded
into a microfluidic device, as described previously.[43,44] The bacteria grew and divided to form small microcolonies, as shown
in Figure B and in Movies S1 and S2,
where the movies show the growth and response to guaB2 silencing of two different microcolonies in the microfluidic device.
After approximately 74 h, the bacteria were exposed to 100 ng/mL ATc
for about 260 h (between 74 and 334 h, in the experiment shown in Figure B). In contrast to
the rapid loss of culturability observed in batch culture (Figure A), bacteria in the
microfluidic device continued to grow and divide normally during the
initial phase of exposure to ATc (∼75–125 h). This might
be due to differences in the kinetics of response of Mtb to ATc-mediated guaB2 silencing in the two systems.
Alternatively, the apparently normal growth and division observed
microscopically at the early stages of ATc exposure masked an underlying
culturability defect detectable only on solid medium. Subsequently,
however, the growth rate of cells in the microcolonies decreased and
the cells stopped dividing. After this growth arrest, a major fraction
of the cells lysed (white arrows in Figure B), visible as phase-bright remnants. However,
even after 260 h of ATc exposure, a few intact cells remained (still
phase-dark), some of which were able to regrow and divide on supplementation
with guanine (125 μM). We initially supplemented with guanine
in the presence of ATc to verify if guanine was able to rescue the
cells from GuaB2 depletion. Indeed, on guanine supplementation, cells
started elongating even in the presence of ATc (frame 379 h, lower
panel Figure B; Movie S2) and reverted to normal growth rate
and division on ATc withdrawal. In the experiment shown in Figure B, among the microcolonies
exposed to ATc for 260 h and imaged, 42% had at least one survivor
that was able to re-initiate growth and division on guanine supplementation.
This observation likely reflects cell-to-cell variation in the extent
of GuaB2 depletion at the end of period of exposure to ATc, with a
small percentage of cells harboring sufficient GuaB2 to remain viable
and able to import and assimilate guanine and thereby initiate regrowth.
Depletion of GuaB2 Is Bactericidal ex Vivo
Having established
that guaB2 silencing has a bactericidal effect on Mtb in vitro, we then investigated its effect on Mtb in a macrophage infection model. We infected THP-1-derived
macrophages with either the guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 mutant or H37Rv and monitored
the viability of Mtb in the presence (200 ng/mL)
or absence of ATc, alone or in combination with various concentrations
of guanine (0–200 μM) included in the tissue culture
medium, by CFU enumeration over a period of 7 days (Figure A and Figure S9). On the basis of the guanine-dependent culturability effect
observed in vitro, CFUs were scored in all cases by plating samples
on agar, either with or without guanine supplement (200 μM).
The wild type control grew as expected, and its culturability was
not affected by the treatment or plating conditions. The guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 mutant multiplied
efficiently inside macrophages when ATc was not present, albeit slightly
less so than H37Rv. Furthermore, at all time points, no CFUs were
obtained when this strain was plated on agar containing ATc (with
or without guanine), confirming its genetic stability over the course
of the experiment. Silencing of guaB2 by ATc treatment
resulted in a 2 log10 reduction in the intracellular bacillary
load of the mutant strain over the 7-day time course. However, as
observed in axenic culture, the inclusion of guanine in the agar media
resulted in a 0.5–1 log10 increase in CFU count.
In the absence of silencing (no ATc), guanine supplementation of RPMI
media gave a slight growth advantage to the conditional mutant, but
had no effect on the growth of H37Rv. The rescuing effect of guanine
was further enhanced by inclusion of a high concentration of guanine
in the tissue culture medium (≥100 μM) as well as in
the agar. Under these conditions, guaB2 silencing
appeared to be bacteriostatic. Together, these results confirmed that
although GuaB2 is required for intracellular growth of Mtb, the organism can be rescued from the bactericidal effects of GuaB2
deficiency if it has access to sufficiently high levels of guanine.
Figure 6
GuaB2
is essential for growth and survival of Mtb ex vivo
and in vivo. (A) THP-1 cells were infected as described in the Supporting Information and grown in standard
RPMI media in the absence or presence of ATc (200 ng/mL) and/or guanine
(100 or 200 μM), and the effect of silencing on Mtb viability ws assessed by plating serial dilutions as described under Methods and Supporting Information. The results represent the mean ± SD from three biological
replicates. The plating conditions are shown in parentheses in the
legend. (B) Female C57BL/6 mice were infected by low-dose aerosol
with guaB2-guaB3 Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 and treated as described under Methods. Four mice per group were sacrificed at the indicated time points.
Lung homogenates were plated on 7H10 agar with the required antibiotics,
and with or without guanine supplementation, as described under Methods.
GuaB2
is essential for growth and survival of Mtb ex vivo
and in vivo. (A) THP-1 cells were infected as described in the Supporting Information and grown in standard
RPMI media in the absence or presence of ATc (200 ng/mL) and/or guanine
(100 or 200 μM), and the effect of silencing on Mtb viability ws assessed by plating serial dilutions as described under Methods and Supporting Information. The results represent the mean ± SD from three biological
replicates. The plating conditions are shown in parentheses in the
legend. (B) Female C57BL/6 mice were infected by low-dose aerosol
with guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 and treated as described under Methods. Four mice per group were sacrificed at the indicated time points.
Lung homogenates were plated on 7H10agar with the required antibiotics,
and with or without guanine supplementation, as described under Methods.
GuaB2 Is Essential for Mtb To Establish an Infection
in Mice
To evaluate the essentiality of guaB2 in vivo, C57BL/6 mice were infected by aerosol with the guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 mutant strain. Transcriptional silencing of guaB2 was achieved by feeding the animals with doxycycline-containing
food from 5 days prior to infection and throughout the 8-week infection
time course. Control groups received normal food, without doxycycline,
thus allowing expression of guaB2 from the revTetR-regulated
promoter. As depicted in Figure B, the conditional mutant multiplied normally in the
absence of the inducer. Because a control infection with the parental
wild type H37Rv strain was not performed in parallel, we could not
ascertain whether the reduced level of expression of guaB2 in the conditional mutant in the absence of inducer had an impact
on virulence. However, administration of doxycycline at a dose shown
in other studies in our[45] and other laboratories[46,47] to have no effect on the growth of wild type Mtb caused complete clearance of Mtb in the lungs of
the infected animals by week 2 post-infection. The lung bacillary
load at all later time points was likewise below the limit of detection
(1 CFU). Given the data obtained in vitro and ex vivo, where guanine
was shown to partly rescue the culturability of Mtb following ATc-mediated silencing of guaB2 up to
a week postsilencing (Figures A and B),
the effect of guanine supplementation in the media used to score the
lung bacillary loads was also investigated. However, guanine supplementation
had no impact on the CFUs recovered from the mouse lung, irrespective
of whether the animals had been treated with doxycycline. These results
confirm that GuaB2 is essential for Mtb to establish
an infection in mice and demonstrate that guaB2 silencing
is rapidly bactericidal in this animal model.
Discussion
IMP, which is produced via the de novo purine biosynthesis pathway,
is a biosynthetic precursor for both adenine and guanine nucleotides.[48] The conversion of IMP to XMP by IMPDH represents
the first committed step in the production of guanine nucleotides,
which are formed by the subsequent conversion of XMP to GMP and serve
as biosynthetic precursors, substrates, regulators, and signaling
molecules in multiple essential cellular processes that include DNA
and RNA synthesis, protein synthesis, cell envelope biogenesis, vitamin
and cofactor biosynthesis, and the stringent response (Figure ). In addition to the de novo
pathway, cells also have recourse to obtaining guanine nucleotides
via purine salvage, which allows bypass of biosynthetic enzymes by
providing a direct route to GMP (Figure ). By virtue of its central role in the de
novo pathway, IMPDH has emerged as a major target for the development
of drugs for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, cancers, and viral
infections—conditions associated with rapid cellular proliferation
and, hence, a high demand for guanine nucleotides. More recently,
IMPDH has also attracted attention as an antimicrobial drug target.[32,48] Through a series of elegant studies, focused initially on the protozoan
parasite Cryptosporidium parvum, Hedstrom
and colleagues have shown that C. parvum IMPDH-selective
inhibitors, which do not inhibit the human enzyme, are also active
against IMPDH enzymes from a variety of bacterial pathogens, including Mtb.[17,34,48−51]
Figure 7
De
novo biosynthesis and salvage pathways for purines in Mtb illustrating the impact of GuaB2 inhibition. Solid black arrows
denote steps in the de novo pathway, and dashed black arrows denote
steps in the salvage pathway. Gray dashed arrows denote steps for
which canonical enzymes are absent from Mtb. Abbreviations: add, Rv3313c, adenosine deaminase; adk,
Rv0733, adenylate kinase; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; adoK, Rv2202c, adenosine kinase; AMP, adenosine 5′-monophosphate; apt, adenine phosphoribosyltransferase; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; atpA-H, Rv1304-1311, ATP synthase; dADP, deoxyadenosine
diphosphate; dATP, deoxyadenosine triphosphate; deoD, Rv3307, purine-nucleoside phosphorylase; dGDP, deoxyguanosine diphosphate;
dGTP, deoxyguanosine triphosphate; gmk, Rv1389, guanylate
kinase; GMP, guanosine 5′-monophosphate; GDP, guanosine diphosphate;
GTP, guanosine triphosphate; guaA, GMP synthase; guaB2, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH); hpt, Rv3624c, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase;
IMP, inosine 5′-monophosphate; iunH, Rv3393,
purine nucleosidase; ndkA, Rv2445c, nucleoside-diphosphate
kinase; PRPP, 5-phosphoribosyl 1-pyrophosphate; purA, Rv0357c, adenylosuccinate synthetase; purB, Rv0777,
adenylosuccinate lyase; RNR, ribonucleotide reductase; XMP, xanthosine
5′-monophosphate.
De
novo biosynthesis and salvage pathways for purines in Mtb illustrating the impact of GuaB2 inhibition. Solid black arrows
denote steps in the de novo pathway, and dashed black arrows denote
steps in the salvage pathway. Gray dashed arrows denote steps for
which canonical enzymes are absent from Mtb. Abbreviations: add, Rv3313c, adenosine deaminase; adk,
Rv0733, adenylate kinase; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; adoK, Rv2202c, adenosine kinase; AMP, adenosine 5′-monophosphate; apt, adenine phosphoribosyltransferase; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; atpA-H, Rv1304-1311, ATP synthase; dADP, deoxyadenosine
diphosphate; dATP, deoxyadenosine triphosphate; deoD, Rv3307, purine-nucleoside phosphorylase; dGDP, deoxyguanosine diphosphate;
dGTP, deoxyguanosine triphosphate; gmk, Rv1389, guanylate
kinase; GMP, guanosine 5′-monophosphate; GDP, guanosine diphosphate;
GTP, guanosine triphosphate; guaA, GMP synthase; guaB2, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH); hpt, Rv3624c, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase;
IMP, inosine 5′-monophosphate; iunH, Rv3393,
purine nucleosidase; ndkA, Rv2445c, nucleoside-diphosphate
kinase; PRPP, 5-phosphoribosyl 1-pyrophosphate; purA, Rv0357c, adenylosuccinate synthetase; purB, Rv0777,
adenylosuccinate lyase; RNR, ribonucleotide reductase; XMP, xanthosine
5′-monophosphate.The compound described in this study, VCC234718, adds to
the growing list of inhibitors of MtbGuaB2 with
whole-cell activity against the organism.[34,52] Making use of a mutant strain of Mtb that conditionally
underexpresses guaB2, we obtained direct evidence
that VCC234718 retains target selectivity for GuaB2 in whole Mtb cells. As observed for other uncompetitive inhibitors
of GuaB2, VCC234718 was shown to bind at the NAD binding site of the
enzyme. The X-ray crystal structure also revealed that VCC234718 makes
pi interactions with IMP and with the A285 residue and a polar interaction
with IMP via the oxygen of the sulfonamide group to a nitrogen group
of the hypoxanthine ring. The cyclohexyl group of VCC234718 is orientated
to form strong pi interactions with the side chain of the Y487′
residue from the adjacent protomer in the tetramer. Notably, residues
A285 and Y487′ comprise the “inhibitor minimal structural
motif” in MtbGuaB2.[34] Identified originally in the C. parvum enzyme,
this motif has been shown to be required for compound binding to C. parvum IMPDH and to account for inhibitor selectivity
versus the human enzyme.[49,51]In the X-ray
crystal structure of MtbGuaB2 with XMP and NAD reported
recently by Makowska-Grzyska et al. (PDB ID: 4ZQM),[34] the purinamine group of NAD makes pi interactions with
Y487′, including a donor–pi interaction mediated by
the azane. Although the pi–pi and donor–pi interactions
are lost upon mutation of this tyrosine to cysteine, the azane group
of NAD maintains a polar interaction with Y487′ and additional
pi interactions to H286. By contrast, however, the Y487C mutation
would result in the loss of all pi interactions to the cyclohexyl
group of VCC234718; this would explain the high-level resistance to
VCC234718 observed in the mutant strain, SRMV2.6. Using mCSM-Lig,[53] the Y487C mutation is predicted to greatly reduce
the binding affinity of VCC234718, while having minimal effect on
the binding of NAD,[54] and was not predicted
to destabilize GuaB2 using our in-house methods mCSM, SDM, and DUET.[55−57] Consistent with the prediction of a reduced binding affinity for
VCC234718, a recombinant form of MtbGuaB2 carrying
the Y487C mutation was refractory to inhibition by VCC234718 at a
drug concentration of 100 μM—a value 1000-fold higher
than its Ki for wild type MtbGuaB2. The relatively neutral effect of the Y487C mutation on protein
stability and the natural ligand binding affinity and corresponding
reduction in VCC234718 binding would make it a good candidate resistance
mutation[58] and explain its appearance in
SRMV2.6. This also suggests that modification of the cyclohexyl group
of VCC234718 to take advantage of pi interactions to H286 in addition
to Y487′, mimicking the NAD+ natural interactions,
could decrease the propensity for resistance to develop.A potential
liability of metabolic drug targets in microbial pathogens is the
extent to which metabolite salvage would allow the organism to evade
the consequences of target inhibition. When added to culture medium
at a concentration of at least 125 μM, guanine was able to completely
rescue Mtb from the growth inhibitory effects of
VCC234718 exposure or GuaB2 depletion in vitro and in macrophages.
The high concentration of guanine required to bypass GuaB2 activity
might be due to the absence of canonical nucleobase transporters in Mtb, as noted previously.[37] Nonetheless,
the rescuing effect, likely mediated by the conversion of guanine
to GMP through the action of the Hpt, confirmed the functionality
of this component of the purine salvage pathway and established that
VCC234718toxicity was attributable to loss of IMPDH activity. The
inability of xanthine to rescue Mtb from the toxic
effects of GuaB2 inhibition or depletion is consistent with available
information on purine salvage in Mtb.[40] However, guanosine also failed to rescue Mtb from GuaB2 inhibition or depletion toxicity even though
this organism has both purine nucleoside phosphorylase[59] and nucleoside hydrolase activities.[60] One possible explanation for this is that Mtb is unable to transport guanosine, a conclusion also
consistent with the observation that this organism lacks NCS1 and
NCS2 nucleoside cation symporter family homologues.[37] Because GuaB2 is the only one of the three GuaB orthologues
in Mtb with confirmed IMPDH activity,[24] our findings confirm that GuaB2 is the primary
target of VCC234718 in Mtb. This conclusion is consistent
with the fact that guanine rescue of the noncomplemented conditional
mutant, guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF, from ATctoxicity, was
indistinguishable from that of its guaB3-complemented
derivative, guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3; that is, both VCC234718hypersensitivity
and ATc-dependent growth phenotypes of the complemented mutant were
attributable exclusively to GuaB2 deficiency.In the absence
of guanine supplementation, guaB2 silencing was rapidly
bactericidal in vitro, ex vivo, and in mouse lung. Although nonculturable Mtb cells in which growth could be rescued by exogenous
guanine persisted for at least 7 days under conditions of guaB2 silencing in vitro and ex vivo, they were not detectable
in the lungs of mice sacrificed 14 days post-infection. The rapid
loss of viability of Mtb in vivo when guaB2 silencing was initiated at the time of infection confirms that Mtb has limited access to guanine in mouse lung and that
GuaB2 is therefore essential for Mtb to establish
an infection in mice. These results provide compelling validation
for GuaB2 as a TB drug target in this animal model. VCC234718 can
be considered as a valuable starting point to develop a compound for
treating TB infections in humans: it showed good potential for oral
route administration, but liabilities such as potential drug–drug
interactions and high metabolism along with an alert on ERG channel
interaction will require further chemical optimization. Finally, to
our knowledge, the levels of guanine have not been reported in lung
tissue from mice infected with Mtb. Although our
results suggest that guanine levels are not adequate to bypass the
essentiality of GuaB2 in this model, it should be recalled that there
are profound differences in disease pathology between mice and humans—and,
hence, in the microenvironments encountered by Mtb during the course of infection.[61] Further
advancement of this target will therefore be contingent upon an assessment
of the levels of guanine in human TB lesions.
Methods
Bacterial Culture
Conditions
The bacterial strains reported in this study are
described in Table S5. Unless otherwise
indicated, the strains were grown as described in the Supporting Information.
Identification,
Evaluation, and Chemical Synthesis of VCC234718
A total of
15344 small molecules (Vichem Chemie) were screened in 384-well plate
format for their antitubercular activity at 20 μM (7 days exposure)
against replicating H37Rv and nonreplicating streptomycin-starved
18b as described previously.[17] VCC234718
was identified as a hit (percentage inhibition of resazurin reduction
of >80% at 20 μM) and re-evaluated to determine its MIC by
resazurin microtiter assay (REMA)[17] with
serial dilutions of the compounds of interest (20–0.04 μM).
In parallel to MIC evaluation, VCC234718 was evaluated for its concentration-dependent
cytotoxicity (TC50) against four cell lines (HepG2, Huh7,
A549, and THP-1) by REMA as described previously.[62] The chemical synthesis of VCC234718 is described in the Supporting Information.
Early ADMET
Early
ADMET studies were performed as described in the Supporting Information.
Drug Susceptibility Testing
Unless indicated otherwise, MIC testing was carried out by broth
microdilution using the AlamarBlue (AB, Invitrogen) assay. For pairwise
combination (checkerboard) assays, a two-dimensional array of serial
dilutions of two test compounds was prepared in 96-well plates, as
previously described.[36,37] Time–kill kinetic analyses
were carried out as previously described.[37] The intracellular activity of VCC234718 was assessed by anticytolytic
screening in Mtb-infected MRC-5 fibroblasts or activated
THP-1 macrophages, as described by Rybniker et al.[19]
Isolation and Whole-Genome Sequencing of
VCC234718-Resistant Mutants of Mtb
Mutants
of Mtb resistant to VCC234718 were isolated as described
in the Supporting Information. Genomic
DNA from the wild type H37Rv and three VCC234718-resistant mutants
was sequenced by Illumina HiSeq, and reads were processed by HTSstation[63] to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms
present in the mutants. The mutation found in guaB2 (Rv3411c) in the mutant SRMV2.6 was confirmed by
Sanger sequencing following PCR amplification using the oligonucleotides
listed in Table S6 and Phusion High-Fidelity
DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific). The PCR products were purified
by using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen), and Sanger sequencing
was performed by using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing
kit and the sequencing primers listed in Table S6.
Construction of Mutant Strains of Mtb with Altered Expression of GuaB2
Mtb strains carrying wild type guaB2, guaB2-guaB3, or guaB2Y487C under the control of
the native promoter were constructed using the vectors pTTguaB2, pTTguaB2-guaB3,
and pTTguaB2Y487C (Table S5),
which were constructed as outlined in the Supporting Information. The conditional mutants, guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF and guaB2-guaB3Tet-ON, and in which guaB2-guaB3 was placed under the control of a Tet-regulated
promoter were constructed as described in the Supporting Information. The complemented conditional mutant, guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3, which carries an integrated copy of guaB3 under
control of the operon promoter, was constructed by transforming guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF with the vector, pTTguaB3 (Table S5).
Western Blot Analysis
Western blotting was performed as described in the Supporting Information according to the protocol
reported by Singh et al.[37]
Gene Expression
Analysis by ddPCR
Quantitative gene expression analysis was
carried by means of ddPCR using a previously reported method,[37] as described in the Supporting Information.
Intracellular Growth and Survival of Mtb
Intracellular growth and survival of wild type
and conditional mutant strains of Mtb were assessed
using a modification of the method of Manganelli et al.[64] as described in the Supporting Information.
Mouse Infection
Female C57BL/6 mice
(Charles River Laboratories) were infected by low-dose aerosol with
the guaB2 conditional knockdown strain. Mice were
fed doxycycline-containing food (2000 ppm, Harlan) starting from 5
days before infection. Control groups were fed regular diet, equal
in composition to the doxycycline-containing food except for the antibiotic.
Four mice per group and time point were sacrificed at day 0, week
2, week 4, and week 8 post-infection. Lung homogenates were plated
on 7H10 plates supplemented with kanamycin (25 μg/mL), hygromycin
(50 μg/mL), gentamycin (2.5 μg/mL), and cycloheximide
(10 μg/mL). Lung homogenates were plated in parallel on 7H10
plates with and without guanine (250 μM). Experimental procedures
involving animals were approved by the Swiss Cantonal and Federal
Authorities (authorization no. 2658).
Cloning, Expression, and
Purification of Mtb GuaB2, Mtb GuaB2Y487C, and Mth GuaB2
Recombinant
forms of MtbGuaB2, MtbGuaB2Y487C, and Mth GuaB2 were cloned, expressed,
and purified as described in the Supporting Information.
Enzymatic Analyses
The enzymatic characterization and
steady-state kinetics of MtbGuaB2 and the kinetics
of inhibition of MtbGuaB2, MtbGuaB2Y487C, and human IMPDH by VCC234718 were performed as described
in the Supporting Information.
Crystallization,
Compound Soaking, and X-ray Data Collection
The Mth GuaB2 ΔCBS protein crystallized in 2 μL hanging drops
in 1:1 ratio with 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, 200 mM calcium chloride,
and 8–14% isopropanol. Crystals appeared after 24 h and grew
to full size within a week. Crystals were soaked overnight in drops
of well solution + 5 mM IMP and 10 mM VCC234718 solubilized in 100%
DMSO. The crystals were cryoprotected, passed through drops containing
well solution + 25% glycerol, and subsequently flash-frozen in liquid
nitrogen. Data were collected from the crystals at Diamond Light Source
beamline I24. The VCC234718-soaked crystals diffracted to 1.6 Å
resolution.
Structure Solution, Ligand Fitting, and Refinement
Data were processed using XDS[65] and
Pointless (CCP4). To solve the structure, molecular replacement was
performed with Phenix Phaser[66] using a
previously solved IMP-bound Mth GuaB2 ΔCBS
structure as a probe (unpublished data). Refinement was performed
using Phenix.refine and manually in Coot.[67] IMP and VCC234718 were sequentially fitted into the density using
the LigandFit function of Phenix, and the structures were manually
refined further using Coot. Final R/Rfree scores obtained were 0.17/0.19,
respectively. Information regarding the crystallographic statistics
can be found in Table S4. The coordinates
for the Mth GuaB2 ΔCBS structure in complex
with IMP and VCC234718 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank
under the accession no. 5J5R.
Time-Lapse Microscopy
Time-lapse
microscopy of the guaB2-guaB3Tet-OFF attB::guaB3 strain was carried out using previously
described methods.[43] Briefly, the cells
were cultured in a flask in 7H9 medium supplemented with 25 μg/mL
kanamycin, 50 μg/mL hygromycin, and 2.5 μg/mL gentamycin
at 37 °C. When the culture reached midexponential phase, the
bacteria were concentrated 10-fold and filtered through a 5 μm
filter to get rid of clumps. The single-cell suspension of cells was
then placed in a custom-made microfluidic chip, which was then assembled
on the stage of a Deltavision PersonalDV inverted microscope (GE Healthcare).
The entire stage and objectives were enclosed in an incubator chamber
maintained at 37 °C. Fresh 7H9 medium (supplemented with either
100 ng/mL ATc or 125 μM guanine) was circulated through the
device at a flow rate of 15 μL/min. Imaging was carried out
every 15 min using a 100× oil-immersion phase objective (Olympus
Plan Semi Apochromat, 1.3 NA) and acquired using a CoolSnap HQ2 camera.
Images were acquired on phase-contrast through the entire duration
of the experiment. Typically about 50–70 independent points
were imaged in each experiment. As an end point assay cells were stained
with propidium iodide (1 μg/mL) and imaged on the red channel
(excitation filter 555/28, emission filter 617/73) for the last 24
h of the experiment. Images were processed and movies assembled using
Softworx 4.1 (Applied Precision, GE HealthCare) or ImageJ v 1.47n.[68,69]
Authors: Wei Li; Ashutosh Upadhyay; Fabio L Fontes; E Jeffrey North; Yuehong Wang; Debbie C Crans; Anna E Grzegorzewicz; Victoria Jones; Scott G Franzblau; Richard E Lee; Dean C Crick; Mary Jackson Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Veeraraghavan Usha; Sudagar S Gurcha; Andrew L Lovering; Adrian J Lloyd; Athina Papaemmanouil; Robert C Reynolds; Gurdyal S Besra Journal: Microbiology (Reading) Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 2.777
Authors: Anna Milano; Maria Rosalia Pasca; Roberta Provvedi; Anna Paola Lucarelli; Giulia Manina; Ana Luisa de Jesus Lopes Ribeiro; Riccardo Manganelli; Giovanna Riccardi Journal: Tuberculosis (Edinb) Date: 2008-10-11 Impact factor: 3.131
Authors: Gisele Biazus; Cristopher Z Schneider; Mario S Palma; Luiz A Basso; Diógenes S Santos Journal: Protein Expr Purif Date: 2009-04-10 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: S T Cole; R Brosch; J Parkhill; T Garnier; C Churcher; D Harris; S V Gordon; K Eiglmeier; S Gas; C E Barry; F Tekaia; K Badcock; D Basham; D Brown; T Chillingworth; R Connor; R Davies; K Devlin; T Feltwell; S Gentles; N Hamlin; S Holroyd; T Hornsby; K Jagels; A Krogh; J McLean; S Moule; L Murphy; K Oliver; J Osborne; M A Quail; M A Rajandream; J Rogers; S Rutter; K Seeger; J Skelton; R Squares; S Squares; J E Sulston; K Taylor; S Whitehead; B G Barrell Journal: Nature Date: 1998-06-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Srinivasa P S Rao; Suresh B Lakshminarayana; Ravinder R Kondreddi; Maxime Herve; Luis R Camacho; Pablo Bifani; Sarath K Kalapala; Jan Jiricek; Ng L Ma; Bee H Tan; Seow H Ng; Mahesh Nanjundappa; Sindhu Ravindran; Peck G Seah; Pamela Thayalan; Siao H Lim; Boon H Lee; Anne Goh; Whitney S Barnes; Zhong Chen; Kerstin Gagaring; Arnab K Chatterjee; Kevin Pethe; Kelli Kuhen; John Walker; Gu Feng; Sreehari Babu; Lijun Zhang; Francesca Blasco; David Beer; Margaret Weaver; Veronique Dartois; Richard Glynne; Thomas Dick; Paul W Smith; Thierry T Diagana; Ujjini H Manjunatha Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Veeraraghavan Usha; Judith V Hobrath; Sudagar S Gurcha; Robert C Reynolds; Gurdyal S Besra Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anna E Grzegorzewicz; Ha Pham; Vijay A K B Gundi; Michael S Scherman; Elton J North; Tamara Hess; Victoria Jones; Veronica Gruppo; Sarah E M Born; Jana Korduláková; Sivagami Sundaram Chavadi; Christophe Morisseau; Anne J Lenaerts; Richard E Lee; Michael R McNeil; Mary Jackson Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2012-02-19 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Suresh Kumar Gorla; Yan Zhang; Meaghan M Rabideau; Aiping Qin; Shibin Chacko; Amanda L House; Corey R Johnson; Kavitha Mandapati; Hannah M Bernstein; Elizabeth S McKenney; Helena Boshoff; Minjia Zhang; Ian J Glomski; Joanna B Goldberg; Gregory D Cuny; Barbara J Mann; Lizbeth Hedstrom Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Malancha Karmakar; Maria Globan; Janet A M Fyfe; Timothy P Stinear; Paul D R Johnson; Natasha E Holmes; Justin T Denholm; David B Ascher Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Shibin Chacko; Helena I M Boshoff; Vinayak Singh; Davide M Ferraris; Deviprasad R Gollapalli; Minjia Zhang; Ann P Lawson; Michael J Pepi; Andrzej Joachimiak; Menico Rizzi; Valerie Mizrahi; Gregory D Cuny; Lizbeth Hedstrom Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Joanna C Evans; Dinakaran Murugesan; John M Post; Vitor Mendes; Zhe Wang; Navid Nahiyaan; Sasha L Lynch; Stephen Thompson; Simon R Green; Peter C Ray; Jeannine Hess; Christina Spry; Anthony G Coyne; Chris Abell; Helena I M Boshoff; Paul G Wyatt; Kyu Y Rhee; Tom L Blundell; Clifton E Barry; Valerie Mizrahi Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 5.084