Belen Lafon1, Asif Rahman2, Marom Bikson2, Lucas C Parra2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: belulafon@gmail.com. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Direct current stimulation (DCS) affects both neuronal firing rate and synaptic efficacy. The neuronal input/output (I/O) function determines the likelihood that a neuron elicits an action potential in response to synaptic input of a given strength. Changes of the neuronal I/O function by DCS may underlie previous observations in animal models and human testing, yet have not been directly assessed. OBJECTIVE: Test if the neuronal input/output function is affected by DCS METHODS: Using rat hippocampal brain slices and computational modeling, we provide evidence for how DCS modulates the neuronal I/O function. RESULTS: We show for the first time that DCS modulates the likelihood of neuronal firing for a given and fixed synaptic input. Opposing polarization of soma and dendrite may have a synergistic effect for anodal stimulation, increasing the driving force of synaptic activity while simultaneously increasing spiking probability at the soma. For cathodal stimulation, however, the opposing effects tend to cancel. This results in an asymmetry in the strength of the effects of stimulation for opposite polarities. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may explain the asymmetries observed in acute and long term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation.
BACKGROUND: Direct current stimulation (DCS) affects both neuronal firing rate and synaptic efficacy. The neuronal input/output (I/O) function determines the likelihood that a neuron elicits an action potential in response to synaptic input of a given strength. Changes of the neuronal I/O function by DCS may underlie previous observations in animal models and human testing, yet have not been directly assessed. OBJECTIVE: Test if the neuronal input/output function is affected by DCS METHODS: Using rat hippocampal brain slices and computational modeling, we provide evidence for how DCS modulates the neuronal I/O function. RESULTS: We show for the first time that DCS modulates the likelihood of neuronal firing for a given and fixed synaptic input. Opposing polarization of soma and dendrite may have a synergistic effect for anodal stimulation, increasing the driving force of synaptic activity while simultaneously increasing spiking probability at the soma. For cathodal stimulation, however, the opposing effects tend to cancel. This results in an asymmetry in the strength of the effects of stimulation for opposite polarities. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may explain the asymmetries observed in acute and long term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation.
Authors: Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Tony W Wilson; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Alex I Wiesman; Mackenzie S Mills; Timothy J McDermott; Rachel K Spooner; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson Journal: Cortex Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Zhi-De Deng; Bruce Luber; Nicholas L Balderston; Melbaliz Velez Afanador; Michelle M Noh; Jeena Thomas; William C Altekruse; Shannon L Exley; Shriya Awasthi; Sarah H Lisanby Journal: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 13.820
Authors: Timothy J McDermott; Alex I Wiesman; Mackenzie S Mills; Rachel K Spooner; Nathan M Coolidge; Amy L Proskovec; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 5.038