Literature DB >> 29187553

Ih interacts with somato-dendritic structure to determine frequency response to weak alternating electric field stimulation.

Enrique H S Toloza1, Ehsan Negahbani2, Flavio Fröhlich1,2,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Transcranial current stimulation (tCS) modulates brain dynamics using weak electric fields. Given the pathological changes in brain network oscillations in neurological and psychiatric illnesses, using alternating electric field waveforms that engage rhythmic activity has been proposed as a targeted, network-level treatment approach. Previous studies have investigated the effects of electric fields at the neuronal level. However, the biophysical basis of the cellular response to electric fields has remained limited. Here, we characterized the frequency-dependent response of different compartments in a layer V pyramidal neuron to exogenous electric fields to dissect the relative contributions of voltage-gated ion channels and neuronal morphology. Hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in the distal dendrites was the primary ionic mechanism shaping the model's response to electric field stimulation and caused subthreshold resonance in the tuft at 20 ± 4 Hz. In contrast, subthreshold Ih-mediated resonance in response to local sinusoidal current injection was present in all model compartments at 11 ± 2 Hz. The frequencies of both resonance responses were modulated by Ih conductance density. We found that the difference in resonance frequency between the two stimulation types can be explained by the fact that exogenous electric fields simultaneously polarize the membrane potentials at the distal ends of the neuron (relative to field direction) in opposite directions. Our results highlight the role of Ih in shaping the cellular response to electric field stimulation and suggest that the common model of tCS as a weak somatic current injection fails to capture the cellular effects of electric field stimulation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Modulation of cortical oscillation by brain stimulation serves as a tool to understand the causal role of network oscillations in behavior and is a potential treatment modality that engages impaired network oscillations in disorders of the central nervous system. To develop targeted stimulation paradigms, cellular-level effects must be understood. We demonstrate that hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) and cell morphology cooperatively shape the response to applied alternating electric fields.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apical dendrites; hyperpolarization-activated cation current; layer 5 pyramidal neurons; subthreshold resonance; transcranial electric field stimulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29187553      PMCID: PMC5899309          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00541.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  69 in total

1.  Properties and role of I(h) in the pacing of subthreshold oscillations in entorhinal cortex layer II neurons.

Authors:  C T Dickson; J Magistretti; M H Shalinsky; E Fransén; M E Hasselmo; A Alonso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons.

Authors:  B Hutcheon; Y Yarom
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Dendritic resonance in rat neocortical pyramidal cells.

Authors:  Daniel Ulrich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases.

Authors:  Min-Fang Kuo; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Models of subthreshold membrane resonance in neocortical neurons.

Authors:  B Hutcheon; R M Miura; E Puil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Distribution and function of HCN channels in the apical dendritic tuft of neocortical pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Mark T Harnett; Jeffrey C Magee; Stephen R Williams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Interaction of Intrinsic and Synaptic Currents Mediate Network Resonance Driven by Layer V Pyramidal Cells.

Authors:  Stephen L Schmidt; Christopher R Dorsett; Apoorva K Iyengar; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  A model for the polarization of neurons by extrinsically applied electric fields.

Authors:  D Tranchina; C Nicholson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing.

Authors:  Davide Reato; Asif Rahman; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects.

Authors:  Asif Rahman; Davide Reato; Mattia Arlotti; Fernando Gasca; Abhishek Datta; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  6 in total

1.  Excitatory and inhibitory effects of HCN channel modulation on excitability of layer V pyramidal cells.

Authors:  Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen; Verónica Mäki-Marttunen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.779

2.  Effects of Ih and TASK-like shunting current on dendritic impedance in layer 5 pyramidal-tract neurons.

Authors:  Craig Kelley; Salvador Dura-Bernal; Samuel A Neymotin; Srdjan D Antic; Nicholas T Carnevale; Michele Migliore; William W Lytton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains alpha oscillations by preferential phase synchronization of fast-spiking cortical neurons to stimulation waveform.

Authors:  Wei A Huang; Iain M Stitt; Ehsan Negahbani; D J Passey; Sangtae Ahn; Marshall Davey; Moritz Dannhauer; Thien T Doan; Anna C Hoover; Angel V Peterchev; Susanne Radtke-Schuller; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Differential polarization of cortical pyramidal neuron dendrites through weak extracellular fields.

Authors:  Florian Aspart; Michiel W H Remme; Klaus Obermayer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Implantable Direct Current Neural Modulation: Theory, Feasibility, and Efficacy.

Authors:  Felix P Aplin; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Temporal interference stimulation targets deep brain regions by modulating neural oscillations.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Greg Kronberg; Davide Reato; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 9.184

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.