Literature DB >> 27714666

Sex differences in virtual navigation influenced by scale and navigation experience.

Lace M Padilla1, Sarah H Creem-Regehr2, Jeanine K Stefanucci2, Elizabeth A Cashdan3.   

Abstract

The Morris water maze is a spatial abilities test adapted from the animal spatial cognition literature and has been studied in the context of sex differences in humans. This is because its standard design, which manipulates proximal (close) and distal (far) cues, applies to human navigation. However, virtual Morris water mazes test navigation skills on a scale that is vastly smaller than natural human navigation. Many researchers have argued that navigating in large and small scales is fundamentally different, and small-scale navigation might not simulate natural human navigation. Other work has suggested that navigation experience could influence spatial skills. To address the question of how individual differences influence navigational abilities in differently scaled environments, we employed both a large- (146.4 m in diameter) and a traditional- (36.6 m in diameter) scaled virtual Morris water maze along with a novel measure of navigation experience (lifetime mobility). We found sex differences on the small maze in the distal cue condition only, but in both cue-conditions on the large maze. Also, individual differences in navigation experience modulated navigation performance on the virtual water maze, showing that higher mobility was related to better performance with proximal cues for only females on the small maze, but for both males and females on the large maze.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Navigation experience; Sex differences; Virtual navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27714666     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1118-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability.

Authors:  Catherine M Jones; Victoria A Braithwaite; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Cognitive maps in rats and men.

Authors:  E C TOLMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1948-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Why size counts: children's spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures.

Authors:  Amy E Learmonth; Nora S Newcombe; Natalie Sheridan; Meredith Jones
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-05

4.  Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory.

Authors:  Xiaoqian J Chai; Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task.

Authors:  N J Sandstrom; J Kaufman; S A Huettel
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1998-04

Review 6.  Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory.

Authors:  R D'Hooge; P P De Deyn
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2001-08

7.  Simple gaze analysis and special design of a virtual Morris water maze provides a new method for differentiating egocentric and allocentric navigational strategy choice.

Authors:  Sharon A Livingstone-Lee; Sonja Murchison; Philip M Zeman; Mehul Gandhi; Dustin van Gerven; Lauren Stewart; Nigel J Livingston; Ronald W Skelton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat.

Authors:  R Morris
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape.

Authors:  Xiaoqian J Chai; Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 10.  Challenges for identifying the neural mechanisms that support spatial navigation: the impact of spatial scale.

Authors:  Thomas Wolbers; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis of sex differences in human navigation skills.

Authors:  Alina Nazareth; Xing Huang; Daniel Voyer; Nora Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  Temporal and spatial contiguity are necessary for competition between events.

Authors:  Estibaliz Herrera; José A Alcalá; Toru Tazumi; Matthew G Buckley; José Prados; Gonzalo P Urcelay
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Cultural differences in room size perception.

Authors:  Aurelie Saulton; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Stephan de la Rosa; Trevor J Dodds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The role of perception and action on the use of allocentric information in a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  Harun Karimpur; Johannes Kurz; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.