Literature DB >> 19331451

Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape.

Xiaoqian J Chai1, Lucia F Jacobs.   

Abstract

How males and females differ in their use of cues for spatial navigation is an important question. Although women and men appear to respond differently to close and distant objects, object features and the geometry of spaces, the common denominator of these sex-specific cue preferences is unknown. By constructing virtual landscapes from either directional (graded, gradient) or positional (pinpoint) cues, the authors tested the hypothesis that sex differences arise from preferences for cues that provide primarily direction or position, as predicted by the parallel map model of the cognitive map. Women and men learned a target location in the presence of either one or the other class of cues. Men were more accurate in estimating the target location overall, but the navigation accuracy difference between men and women was greater in the presence of directional cues. Our findings provide support for the parallel map model and suggest that the previously reported male advantage in the presence of distant objects and geometric cues derives from their function as directional cues. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19331451     DOI: 10.1037/a0014722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  24 in total

1.  Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Xinyi Gong; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

Review 2.  Does terrain slope really dominate goal searching?

Authors:  Daniele Nardi
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

3.  Aging and lateralization of the rat brain on a biochemical level.

Authors:  Zdena Kristofiková; Jan Rícný; Michael Ort; Daniela Rípová
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks.

Authors:  Daniele Nardi; Nora S Newcombe; Thomas F Shipley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

5.  Sex differences and the effect of instruction on reorientation abilities by humans.

Authors:  Megan N Siemens; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

Review 6.  Sex differences in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Rena Li; Meharvan Singh
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 8.606

7.  Development of human brain cortical network architecture during infancy.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Sarael Alcauter; J Keith Smith; John H Gilmore; Weili Lin
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.270

8.  Navigation performance in virtual environments varies with fractal dimension of landscape.

Authors:  Arthur W Juliani; Alexander J Bies; Cooper R Boydston; Richard P Taylor; Margaret E Sereno
Journal:  J Environ Psychol       Date:  2016-09

9.  No Sex or Age Difference in Dead-Reckoning Ability among Tsimane Forager-Horticulturalists.

Authors:  Benjamin C Trumble; Steven J C Gaulin; Matt D Dunbar; Hillard Kaplan; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-03

Review 10.  Sex differences and errors in the use of terrain slope for navigation.

Authors:  Daniele Nardi; Corinne A Holmes; Nora S Newcombe; Steven M Weisberg
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.