Literature DB >> 19963014

Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory.

Xiaoqian J Chai1, Lucia F Jacobs.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of cue types on human spatial memory in 3D virtual environments adapted from classical animal and human tasks. Two classes of cues of different functions were investigated: those that provide directional information, and those that provide positional information. Adding a directional cue (geographical slant) to the spatial delayed-match-to-sample task improved performance in males but not in females. When the slant directional cue was removed in a hidden-target location task, male performance was impaired but female performance was unaffected. The removal of positional cues, on the other hand, impaired female performance but not male performance. These results are consistent with results from laboratory rodents and thus support the hypothesis that sex differences in spatial memory arise from the dissociation between a preferential reliance on directional cues in males and on positional cues in females. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19963014     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  20 in total

1.  Reorienting with terrain slope and landmarks.

Authors:  Daniele Nardi; Nora S Newcombe; Thomas F Shipley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

2.  Head for the hills: the influence of environmental slant on spatial memory organization.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

Review 3.  A meta-analysis of sex differences in human navigation skills.

Authors:  Alina Nazareth; Xing Huang; Daniel Voyer; Nora Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

4.  Sex Differences in Context Fear Generalization and Recruitment of Hippocampus and Amygdala during Retrieval.

Authors:  Ashley A Keiser; Lacie M Turnbull; Mara A Darian; Dana E Feldman; Iris Song; Natalie C Tronson
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Use of spatial information and search strategies in a water maze analog in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julien Foucaud; James G Burns; Frederic Mery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spatial Navigation Strategies in Peromyscus: a Comparative Study.

Authors:  Eldin Jašarević; Scott A Williams; R Michael Roberts; David C Geary; Cheryl S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 7.  Sex differences and errors in the use of terrain slope for navigation.

Authors:  Daniele Nardi; Corinne A Holmes; Nora S Newcombe; Steven M Weisberg
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

8.  Sex differences in virtual navigation influenced by scale and navigation experience.

Authors:  Lace M Padilla; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; Jeanine K Stefanucci; Elizabeth A Cashdan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

Review 9.  Let's call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function.

Authors:  Nicola M Grissom; Teresa M Reyes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Digit ratio predicts sense of direction in women.

Authors:  Xiaoqian J Chai; Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.